Another appalling distraction from the issues

A卐卐HatZombie;1683621 said:
But we do want someone who would stop destroying the people with bad globalist policies.

And you support assassination as a means to that end. Don't lie.
 
And certainly, if there were anyone that Trump needed to use clear and concise language with in order to prevent violence against Clinton, it's Trump supporters.
 
The Secret Service said it is "aware of the comments" and won't be making any further statements after Trump's remarks. If they decide to act, he'll be joining some allies on the hot seat.

Trump's longtime butler, Anthony Senecal, was investigated by the Secret Service for Facebook comments saying President Obama should be "shot as an enemy agent" and "hung for treason."

Trump advisor Al Baldasaro is facing a similar investigation from the Secret Service for saying during last month's Republican National Convention that Clinton should be "shot for treason."

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/donald-trump-hot-water-secret-service-article-1.2744810
 
How many times have you asked people to provide you with the exact words you said? I've seen you call people liars for saying your words "clearly implied" something when your express words could maybe be interpreted as something else. Like your claim about Marco Rubio betraying his "race" because of Trump's stance on Mexicans.

Fucking massive hypocrite.

Naturally you don't want to discuss Trump's comments, being the good little Trumpkin you are.

So of course you instead attack the messenger...typical.
 
I just don't see, given Trumps history, how it could be taken any other way. To assume he meant through legal lobbying etc, is to assume that he's suddenly become less of an imbecile when it comes to how the government works.

He certainly could have worded it MUCH better if that's actually what he meant. Personally, just as ridiculous as it may seem to you that he suggested a shooting, it is as equally ridiculous to me that he meant something innocuous. We could both be wrong, that's the bad thing about his vague wording.

Help me out here.

Precisely what good would lobbying do regarding Clinton's SC picks?
 
Naturally you don't want to discuss Trump's comments, being the good little Trumpkin you are.

So of course you instead attack the messenger...typical.

Naturally you're lying as I have discussed his comments. And naturally you want to avoid talking about your massive hypocrisy.
 
Trump brings on press scrutiny himself. In fact, I think he does it on purpose.

ROFL!!

Butthurt Yurt acknowledges the truth in my OP!!

How pathetic is it that?

Your hatred for me runs so deep you can't bring yourself to admit to me you agree with me.
 
ROFL!!

You acknowledge the truth in my OP!!

How pathetic is it that?

Your hatred for me runs so deep you can't bring yourself to admit to me you agree with me.

I do agree with you here. That has nothing to do with your massive hypocrisy and lies. You are the one who claims people can't tell you what you meant but you can sure say what other people meant.

Dumbass.
 
I just don't see, given Trumps history, how it could be taken any other way. To assume he meant through legal lobbying etc, is to assume that he's suddenly become less of an imbecile when it comes to how the government works.

He certainly could have worded it MUCH better if that's actually what he meant. Personally, just as ridiculous as it may seem to you that he suggested a shooting, it is as equally ridiculous to me that he meant something innocuous. We could both be wrong, that's the bad thing about his vague wording.

As a non Trump supporter I am non plussed either way. I am merely amused by the constant hand wringing.

But according to GayRod Trump is a Hillary plant so she played you libtards too
 
So, instead of talking about Hillary's starring role in the collapse of the Middle East---that spanned two administrations; stagnant economic growth; the failure of Obamacare; Russian uranium deals with the Clinton Slush Fund; the rising Domestic Islamist threat and a multiplicity of etc's, the Lock-Step media is all aghast because Trump maybe might have meant for someone to shoot Hillary.

Or maybe he meant that the 2nd amendment people could somehow stop her in the courts. But it's Trump and we all know how Trump is lol.

What a joke.

Why doesn't Douchebag Donald just STFU already? Then you won't have to worry about these "distractions."
 
Back
Top