Litmus
Verified User
The policy is designed to protect the child
No. It's designed to keep parents from interfering with nanny state abortions.
The policy is designed to protect the child
Hence you make it so they can make a case to a court who would be Pro-Tem Parentis...
Damo, how would that work? Is a teenage girl, pregnant and scared, to be expected to be able to retain an attorney, on her own, hiding that from her parents? How is she going to know how to do this?
That's just plain bullshit Cypress....most girls WILL NOT tell their parents if they are young.
I didn't.... I was afraid to tell them I was pregnant........and my parents are wonderful, loving parents.... there was no fear of them hurting me, there was fear of them being disappointed with me....and as a teen, you don't think straight, that fear of disappointment over ruled me telling them, until 5 years later....until after I was married.
I don't think I was an exception to the rule at that young age...and I was 18 already but still living with them.
The only reason this was reversed is because they did not give an exception for the health of girl, I thought?
16 year olds will think even less "straight" than an 18 year old.
I have a problem that the government requires a permission slip to give your child aspirin, while a doctor performing an abortion on your child without notifying you is okay?
This is your child, your health insurance for your child will cover them if the abortion goes wrong or if you don't have insurance, your pocketbook will be responsible for your child's healthcare bills, you are still legally responsible for your child, it is your child.... IF YOUR CHILD IS UNDER 18, the parents should be notified....
The girl will need her parents MORE THAN EVER before, during and after this procedure....hiding it from them, just makes it harder to heal....and easy for one to just pack up the experience in to a small little package in her brain, only later to find the package is filled with dynomite, and ready to explode.
imho.
Care
Care, you are proceeding from the premise that all children have parents that they can go to when they "need them more than ever".
My personal feeling is that most girls who have decent parents, this law wouldn't even affect. They're going to go to their parents. I didn't have sex when I was a teenager. (my mom and dad were both dems, my mom an actual lib, so my lack of teenage sexual expermentation must have been my "liberal upbringing"). But if I had had sex, and become pregnant, I wouldn't have had to give any thought to what the law was. I would have went to my mom, who would have gotten me an abortion, in fact, she would have nearly insisted on it, so as not to ruin my life. If something had happened to my mom, I could have went to my father, and he would have gotten me the abortion, and kept his own opinions to himself. (I don't think he would have wanted the abortion) If I wanted the child, I would have went to my father, who would have said, then you'll have it, and he was in the position to finance that.
The problem is, I'm well aware, I'm lucky. I had good parents. I wish everyone had good parents. But they don't. Those are the ones we need to protect.
So "good parents" = "Pro abortion" parents?
Good parents are parents you can go to when you're in trouble, without fear of being beaten, punished or thrown out. I think my post made it pretty clear that my father was not "pro abortion", just that he was a rare man. He kept his own counsel and lived and let live. He believed we all had to make our own mistakes, and if you asked his advice he'd give it to you, but if you decided to do the opposite, he'd support you, and if you ended up making the wrong choice, he'd never say, I told you so. He'd just say "how can I help"?
So good dads withhold moral guidance from their children?
no,So "good parents" = "Pro abortion" parents?
Since this is totally "OFF-TOPIC" I assume it is also Sarcastic.Porn is a legal product. We need to have the schools provide children with porn without the knowledge of their parents. Who are these parents to deny their children the pleasures of high gloss porno? They must be cut out of the loop. Family = racism.
Your first comment was uncalledfor, this one is just as badSo good dads withhold moral guidance from their children?
So "good parents" = "Pro abortion" parents?
That's just plain bullshit Cypress....most girls WILL NOT tell their parents if they are young.
I didn't.... I was afraid to tell them I was pregnant........and my parents are wonderful, loving parents.... there was no fear of them hurting me, there was fear of them being disappointed with me....and as a teen, you don't think straight, that fear of disappointment over ruled me telling them, until 5 years later....until after I was married.
I don't think I was an exception to the rule at that young age...and I was 18 already but still living with them.
The only reason this was reversed is because they did not give an exception for the health of girl, I thought?
16 year olds will think even less "straight" than an 18 year old.
I have a problem that the government requires a permission slip to give your child aspirin, while a doctor performing an abortion on your child without notifying you is okay?
This is your child, your health insurance for your child will cover them if the abortion goes wrong or if you don't have insurance, your pocketbook will be responsible for your child's healthcare bills, you are still legally responsible for your child, it is your child.... IF YOUR CHILD IS UNDER 18, the parents should be notified....
The girl will need her parents MORE THAN EVER before, during and after this procedure....hiding it from them, just makes it harder to heal....and easy for one to just pack up the experience in to a small little package in her brain, only later to find the package is filled with dynomite, and ready to explode.
imho.
Care
Uh, no.
Good parents help their daughter, communicate with her, and support her. And educate her, evaluate all the options with her, and ultmately support her decisions about her own body.
A bad parent would force a girl to carry an embryo to term. An evil parent would use the government to give them the backing of law to force their daughter to carry a fetus against her own wishes.
Or maybe they would just give other information about adoptions and such, and express their belief that killing is wrong, but still ultimately respect her wishes. We can only speculate as to what they would do if they're lied to and left out of the loop. And that's what's sick here, deceiving parents about their children's health. That's what's evil here.
Asshat: Or maybe they would just give other information about adoptions and such, and express their belief that killing is wrong, but still ultimately respect her wishes
That's exactly what I said in that last post:
Cypress: Good parents help their daughter, communicate with her, and support her. And educate her, evaluate all the options with her, and ultmately support her decisions about her own body.
Your first comment was uncalledfor, this one is just as bad
Are you just trying to be contrary???
I agree with this part of your comments.And that's what's sick here, deceiving parents about their children's health. That's what's evil here.
I don't think so. Both comments appeared to be incideous attempts as biasness. and the above comment seems to prove it. this has nothing to do with pro or con abortion.I'm isolating what this is really about: Pro abortion zealots seeking to cut parents out of their children's lives if the parent disagrees with abortion.