Another Republican bites the dust

you should move to Alaska......you would be surrounded by 20% more people that want to be able to kill their children.......

Kill their children MY ASS!

See! This is why most people can't take you serious.

Alaska is the only state in the nation that has 11 men for every 10 women. But even in a state whose population is dominated by men (REPUBLICAN MEN), the people of ALASKA has spoken and said they favor Women's Choice over Banning abortions, and that will change the political landscape for several election cycles now into the future.

Banning abortions was the worst strategy you Republicans could have thunk up!

It has awoken a sleeping Giant that will soon dominate the elections of the future for generations to come.

As a lifelong Democrat, all I can say is, "THANK YOU! FOR BEING SO STUPID"!
 
Last edited:
Kill their children MY ASS!

See! This is why most people can't take you serious.

Alaska is the only state in the nation that has 11 men for every 10 women. But even in a state whose population is dominated by men (REPUBLICAN MEN), the people of ALASKA has spoken and said they favor Women's Choice over Banning abortions, and that will change the political landscape for several election cycles now into the future.

Banning abortions was the worst strategy you Republicans could have thunk up!

It has awoken a sleeping Giant that will soon dominate the elections of the future for generations to come.

As a lifelong Democrat, all I can say is, "THANK YOU! FOR BEING SO STUPID"!

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
 
Kill their children MY ASS!

See! This is why most people can't take you serious.

Alaska is the only state in the nation that has 11 men for every 10 women. But even in a state whose population is dominated by men (REPUBLICAN MEN), the people of ALASKA has spoken and said they favor Women's Choice over Banning abortions, and that will change the political landscape for several election cycles now into the future.

Banning abortions was the worst strategy you Republicans could have thunk up!

It has awoken a sleeping Giant that will soon dominate the elections of the future for generations to come.

As a lifelong Democrat, all I can say is, "THANK YOU! FOR BEING SO STUPID"!

you can't have it both ways......either 60% of Alaska approves abortion, or a woman's right to abortion is at risk of abortion.......make up your mind if you find one.....
 
Don't be surprised if a Demonkkkrat becomes senator of Alaska even though 2/3's of Alaskans don't want a Demonkkkrat senator.

It is a House election, not a Senate election. 51.5% of the voters do not want Palin. That 51.5% will pick a Democrat over Palin.
 
Learn English.
It is not the same election.

It is the same candidates being elected by the same process. It is two and half months later, so a slight difference there, but mostly the same election.

Do you think the voters of Alaska will change their minds in two and a half months and decide Palin is really great?
 
Kill their children MY ASS!

See! This is why most people can't take you serious.

Alaska is the only state in the nation that has 11 men for every 10 women. But even in a state whose population is dominated by men (REPUBLICAN MEN), the people of ALASKA has spoken and said they favor Women's Choice over Banning abortions,
Paradox. Irrational. Abortion is killing children.
and that will change the political landscape for several election cycles now into the future.
No, getting rid of election fraud by Democrats will do that.
Banning abortions was the worst strategy you Republicans could have thunk up!
So you condone murdering your own offspring. Gotit.
It has awoken a sleeping Giant that will soon dominate the elections of the future for generations to come.
Cliche fallacy.
As a lifelong Democrat, all I can say is, "THANK YOU! FOR BEING SO STUPID"!
Assumption of victory fallacy.
 
It is the same candidates being elected by the same process. It is two and half months later, so a slight difference there, but mostly the same election.

Do you think the voters of Alaska will change their minds in two and a half months and decide Palin is really great?

False equivocation fallacy.
 
Wups. You conveniently left out the other candidates.

51.5% will vote for anyone but Palin, so Palin will always lose a head-to-head contest. But what about a three way race? Peltola gets 40% of the vote in a three way race, far more than Palin can get. There is no general election that Palin wins.
 
False equivocation fallacy.

The same candidates running in the same format two and a half months later. There is little difference here.

There is no such thing as "false equivocation fallacy." You might be thinking of "equivocation fallacy", but their are not ambiguous terms being used. You might be thinking "false equivalence fallacy", but the two elections are very, very similar, and I am noting the one difference.

The one difference is two and a half months. That difference means that it will be a November election next time, and so should have a higher turnout. That means more moderate voters, and moderate voters hate Palin... So Palin will probably do a bit worse.
 
51.5% will vote for anyone but Palin, so Palin will always lose a head-to-head contest. But what about a three way race? Peltola gets 40% of the vote in a three way race, far more than Palin can get. There is no general election that Palin wins.

Still ignoring the other two candidates, eh? Still ignoring the date, eh? Still making up numbers, eh?
 
Back
Top