007
New member
I thought only cowards called the plods?Oh, little Paulito doesn't have the cojones to do that.
Zimmerman.....
Or does it change according to your mood?
I thought only cowards called the plods?Oh, little Paulito doesn't have the cojones to do that.
Denying the right to self defense can only benefit a criminal.and your proof of that slime is what?
Does anyone know if he will be charged with possession of an illegal weapon? While the shooting may not have been illegal the weapon apparently was.http://www.opposingviews.com/i/soci...hoir-director-armed-stick-being-fatally-shot#
No homicide charges will be filed against a 17-year-old teen who fatally shot a community choir director in the face with an illegal gun, prosecutors said Tuesday. The shooting is considered justified under Florida's stand-your-ground law because the 40-year-old victim, Julius Jerome Jacobs, was carrying a large stick.
The state attorney’s office in Marion Country said that, although Tyrone Pierson possessed the gun illegally and although his friend managed to escape the same confrontation by fleeing the scene, Pierson is protected under SYG. He was therefore not under any obligation to attempt to retreat before using deadly force.
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/soci...hoir-director-armed-stick-being-fatally-shot#
I thought only cowards called the plods?
Zimmerman.....
Or does it change according to your mood?
liar.No...only cowards need a gun to settle a dispute.
You know...like that coward who needed to stick a gun in some smoker's face for the treasonous crime of smoking in public?
so are you saying that their job is to shoot innocent bystanders?how many people are going to be cops if they get prosecuted for doing their jobs?
no, they are not, as evidenced by numerous court rulings that do not require cops to protect individuals.Police officers are forced to involve themselves in dangerous and stressful situations.
They have a choice.cops are never endangered by their job.
what a fucking idiot you are
no, they are not, as evidenced by numerous court rulings that do not require cops to protect individuals.
if you are prosecuting civilians for bystander injuries, but not cops, you are putting cops above the law and giving them extra rights. period.Police can detain you based on a reasonable suspicion.
When it comes to self defense, no one said cops should have any rights above a citizen. No one said a citizen should be denied the right to defend themselves. Finally, no one said cops are above the law.... idiot!
YOU were asked that question, why not answer it?Call your local police department and ask them.
irrelevant to the questions posed.A police officer doesn't need to be protecting individuals in order to find himself involved in dangerous situations.
Neither does a store clerk, a roofer, a nurse or a bus driver.A police officer doesn't need to be protecting individuals in order to find himself involved in dangerous situations.
Neither does a store clerk, a roofer, a nurse or a bus driver.
Statistically a police officers job is pretty safe.
Much safer than a construction or transport workers job.
Very few of my posts are, just the ones responding to the vile posts of the libpaedos.Oh.
My.
GOD.
An ENTIRE POST without a single vulgarity?
...are you sure you're feeling alright?