It's an investment deal which aided the Russian strategic goal of cornering the global uranium market that it has not been refined to weapons grade levels is irrelevant it is a crucial energy supply and this deal was brokered through bribery, extortion, racketeering, and blackmail, people are going to prison.
Anybody want to guess who is first?
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
It's an investment deal which aided the Russian strategic goal of cornering the global uranium market that it has not been refined to weapons grade levels is irrelevant it is a crucial energy supply and this deal was brokered through bribery, extortion, racketeering, and blackmail, people are going to prison.
No it is US uranium, 20% of our strategic reserves to be exact.
They did lie about Benghazi they claimed it was because of a youtube video you dumb fuck.
The facts are the Uranium One deal was brokered through bribery, racketeering, and extortion, and it aided Russia's strategic goal of cornering the global uranium market. Ask yourself why Holder put a gag order on the FBI informant in the first place?
Obama?
She did not!!! Liar!
Last edited:
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
Twitter is really smart.....
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Twitter is chock full of twats.
Oooooh well then...TWITTER says so, LOL
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Stands back in amazement. CNN has suddenly realised that they are a news organisation, not just an unofficial news outlet for the DNC.
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/obama-era-uranium-deal/index.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/obama-era-uranium-deal/index.html
In nature, uranium is found as uranium-238 (99.2739–99.2752%), uranium-235 (0.7198–0.7202%), and a very small amount of uranium-234 (0.0050–0.0059%).[SUP][4][/SUP] Uranium decays slowly by emitting an alpha particle. The half-life of uranium-238 is about 4.47 billion years and that of uranium-235 is 704 million years,[SUP][5][/SUP] making them useful in dating the age of the Earth.
Many contemporary uses of uranium exploit its unique nuclear properties. Uranium-235 is the only naturally occurring fissile isotope, which makes it widely used in nuclear power plants and nuclear weapons.
No that would be you you laughable faggot:
In this week’s fact-checking video, CNN’s Jake Tapper takes a look at key public and private statements made by then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the day of the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks in Benghazi and the days immediately following. The attacks on the U.S. diplomatic facility and CIA annex resulted in the deaths of four Americans.
As we have written, the Obama administration was quick to blame an online anti-Muslim video, which did trigger protests in Egypt and elsewhere, and slow to acknowledge that the heavily armed assault in Benghazi was a terrorist attack. “Hillary Clinton contributed to that false impression even though the State Department and Hillary Clinton seemed to know from the beginning that this was a terrorist attack,” Tapper says.
The video is based on our item “The Benghazi Timeline, Clinton Edition” and part of our collaboration with CNN’s “State of the Union.” Previous episodes can be found on our “State of the Union with Jake Tapper” page.
http://www.factcheck.org/2016/07/video-clinton-and-benghazi/
http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/07/01/jake-tapper-fact-check-clinton-benghazi-origwx-mss.cnn
Thanks for playing now fucking kill yourself.
Not a single quote from HRC! Telling!
The 2nd link is a video you stupid faggot.
Clinton: Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/10/benghazi-timeline/
Clinton: Religious freedom and religious tolerance are essential to the stability of any nation, any people. Hatred and violence in the name of religion only poison the well. All people of faith and good will know that the actions of a small and savage group in Benghazi do not honor religion or God in any way. Nor do they speak for the more than 1 billion Muslims around the world, many of whom have shown an outpouring of support during this time.
Unfortunately, however, over the last 24 hours, we have also seen violence spread elsewhere. Some seek to justify this behavior as a response to inflammatory, despicable material posted on the Internet. As I said earlier today, the United States rejects both the content and the message of that video. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. At our meeting earlier today, my colleague, the foreign minister of Morocco, said that all prophets should be respected because they are all symbols of our humanity, for all humanity.
But both of us were crystal clear in this paramount message: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind. And we look to leaders around the world to stand up and speak out against violence, and to take steps to protect diplomatic missions from attack.
Unfortunately, however, over the last 24 hours, we have also seen violence spread elsewhere. Some seek to justify this behavior as a response to inflammatory, despicable material posted on the Internet. As I said earlier today, the United States rejects both the content and the message of that video. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. At our meeting earlier today, my colleague, the foreign minister of Morocco, said that all prophets should be respected because they are all symbols of our humanity, for all humanity.
But both of us were crystal clear in this paramount message: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind. And we look to leaders around the world to stand up and speak out against violence, and to take steps to protect diplomatic missions from attack.
Its not like she sent Susan Rice around the weekend talk show circuit with orders to blame it on a video.....its not like Susan Rice pointed out that her boss Hillary refused to discuss the topic in public and sent her out to discuss it. I wonder why? Do the words "plausible deniability" mean anything to you when she knew then that she was lying and could deny ever having claimed that it was a supposed video? Why would she want plausible deniability? Maybe its because she knew when she would toss her hat into the presidential ring...that would be the first topic discussed. She was wrong however...it seems that the people were more interested in her illegal communications server, including the Russians...which is priceless.
Life is Golden
It's Morning in America Again
"A video did DAT"
Are you seriously pretending not to remember this? They all came out for a week and told the American public and media the Ambassador and others were killed because of a video!!!!
