are we all enemy combatants now?

Taichiliberal said:
:rolleyes: Puh-leeze! You deny your years of being a die hard Oather, Threeper, deny your former MinuteMan Icon, deny your history of veiled threats, deny your staunch right wing wonk support of any and all things Bush & Trump (save the Shrub's stance on the border situation). You deny taking a powder right after Jan. 6th, deny throwing your former ideological compadres under the bus, deny changing your icon and description (what the hell does that T-shirt say anyway?). You're just a liar, as anyone who's been on this site for more than 2 years will testify to.

You're no "rebel", just an armchair MAGA troll. Within just a few months upon your return, you're right back to your bluff and bluster self. Only this time, you're having a hissy fit over the FACT that your heroes are going to jail. No one here did that, my friend. The FBI and local cops Intelligence are doing their jobs (for once)...protecting the country from enemies foreign & domestic. Question is, why are you so upset about insurrectionist going to jail? YOU weren't at DC on Jan. 6th, and beyond lip service, you don't even show up on the radar of the FBI or DHS. So spare us all your intellectually impotent and dishonest clap trap. Didn't fly when you were an Oather, won't fly now.
Click to expand...

MAGA isn't a person. False dichotomy fallacy.
 
Nordberg said:
It does not need an amendment when the tension is caused by understanding differences and interpretations. The Supremes tell what they think the Constitution says because it is often not clear and does not apply to modern times. They explain it. They do not change it.
Click to expand...

The Supremes do not have that power or authority. ONLY the people have the power to amend the Constitution. What it meant THEN, it means NOW. there is NO reinterpretation for modern times.
 
Taichiliberal said:
:rolleyes: Puh-leeze! You deny your years of being a die hard Oather, Threeper, deny your former MinuteMan Icon, deny your history of veiled threats, deny your staunch right wing wonk support of any and all things Bush & Trump (save the Shrub's stance on the border situation). You deny taking a powder right after Jan. 6th, deny throwing your former ideological compadres under the bus, deny changing your icon and description (what the hell does that T-shirt say anyway?). You're just a liar, as anyone who's been on this site for more than 2 years will testify to.

You're no "rebel", just an armchair MAGA troll. Within just a few months upon your return, you're right back to your bluff and bluster self. Only this time, you're having a hissy fit over the FACT that your heroes are going to jail. No one here did that, my friend. The FBI and local cops Intelligence are doing their jobs (for once)...protecting the country from enemies foreign & domestic. Question is, why are you so upset about insurrectionist going to jail? YOU weren't at DC on Jan. 6th, and beyond lip service, you don't even show up on the radar of the FBI or DHS. So spare us all your intellectually impotent and dishonest clap trap. Didn't fly when you were an Oather, won't fly now.
Click to expand...

I can only attribute your continued idiocy to your inability to do anything other than remember an avatar, which is mighty pathetic of you. the rest of your trollish bullshit is just that, bullshit.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Puh-leeze! You deny your years of being a die hard Oather, Threeper, deny your former MinuteMan Icon, deny your history of veiled threats, deny your staunch right wing wonk support of any and all things Bush & Trump (save the Shrub's stance on the border situation). You deny taking a powder right after Jan. 6th, deny throwing your former ideological compadres under the bus, deny changing your icon and description (what the hell does that T-shirt say anyway?). You're just a liar, as anyone who's been on this site for more than 2 years will testify to.

You're no "rebel", just an armchair MAGA troll. Within just a few months upon your return, you're right back to your bluff and bluster self. Only this time, you're having a hissy fit over the FACT that your heroes are going to jail. No one here did that, my friend. The FBI and local cops Intelligence are doing their jobs (for once)...protecting the country from enemies foreign & domestic. Question is, why are you so upset about insurrectionist going to jail? YOU weren't at DC on Jan. 6th, and beyond lip service, you don't even show up on the radar of the FBI or DHS. So spare us all your intellectually impotent and dishonest clap trap. Didn't fly when you were an Oather, won't fly now.
Click to expand...



I can only attribute your continued idiocy to your inability to do anything other than remember an avatar, which is mighty pathetic of you. the rest of your trollish bullshit is just that, bullshit.
Click to expand...

translation: STY cannot deny what I just put forth (given his history on this site), so he just does the usual grade school denial and talk back. Typical armchair Oather, Threeper, neocon, teabagger, fibbertarian, alt-right cowardly BS artist. :rolleyes:
 
SmarterthanYou said:
The Supremes do not have that power or authority. ONLY the people have the power to amend the Constitution. What it meant THEN, it means NOW. there is NO reinterpretation for modern times.
Click to expand...

Again, interpreting what the Constitution says and how it applies to cases that come to the court, is them doing their jobs. It is not amending the constitution. not even close. There sure as hell is interpretation. https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/...iter of,Justice Charles Evans Hughes observed. That is exactly what they do.
 
Taichiliberal said:
translation: STY cannot deny what I just put forth (given his history on this site), so he just does the usual grade school denial and talk back. Typical armchair Oather, Threeper, neocon, teabagger, fibbertarian, alt-right cowardly BS artist. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

you must have gotten your translator from china, because it's broke just like dutch uncles..................you should scower the intermemes for more useless labels because you're seriously lacking in your idiocy
 
Nordberg said:
Again, interpreting what the Constitution says and how it applies to cases that come to the court, is them doing their jobs. It is not amending the constitution. not even close. There sure as hell is interpretation. https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/...iter of,Justice Charles Evans Hughes observed. That is exactly what they do.
Click to expand...

again, wrong as usual. the Constitution does not give the federal government power to define and redefine it's restrictions. their job is to inerpret that law as it applies to the limits provided for in the Constitution. that is not interpreting the Constitution.

needing the government to tell you what the Constitution means indicates your failure as an American.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
The Supremes do not have that power or authority. ONLY the people have the power to amend the Constitution. What it meant THEN, it means NOW. there is NO reinterpretation for modern times.
Click to expand...

Uh.. the States. The States have that authority. The people act through their States for the federal Constitution.
The people, however, own the constitution of their State. They created it. They are the only ones that can change it.

However, you basic premise is correct. The Supreme Court has absolutely NO authority to interpret or change the Constitution.
 
Nordberg said:
Again, interpreting what the Constitution says and how it applies to cases that come to the court, is them doing their jobs. It is not amending the constitution. not even close. There sure as hell is interpretation. https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/...iter of,Justice Charles Evans Hughes observed. That is exactly what they do.
Click to expand...

The Supreme Court has no authority to interpret or change the Constitution. False authority fallacy.
See Article III for what authority the Supreme Court DOES have.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
again, wrong as usual. the Constitution does not give the federal government power to define and redefine it's restrictions. their job is to inerpret that law as it applies to the limits provided for in the Constitution. that is not interpreting the Constitution.

needing the government to tell you what the Constitution means indicates your failure as an American.
Click to expand...

Bingo.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
again, wrong as usual. the Constitution does not give the federal government power to define and redefine it's restrictions. their job is to inerpret that law as it applies to the limits provided for in the Constitution. that is not interpreting the Constitution.

needing the government to tell you what the Constitution means indicates your failure as an American.
Click to expand...

Were you unable to understand what I provided? It is clear the function of teSupremes is to do exactly that.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
translation: STY cannot deny what I just put forth (given his history on this site), so he just does the usual grade school denial and talk back. Typical armchair Oather, Threeper, neocon, teabagger, fibbertarian, alt-right cowardly BS artist.
Click to expand...

you must have gotten your translator from china, because it's broke just like dutch uncles..................you should scower the intermemes for more useless labels because you're seriously lacking in your idiocy.
Click to expand...



SOS from STY. He just confirms my previous assessment, and he thinks having the last word is a victory. Pathetic. :rolleyes:
 
Nordberg said:
Were you unable to understand what I provided? It is clear the function of teSupremes is to do exactly that.
Click to expand...

it's as clear as mud...........meaning that you are wrong. only a complete and utter moron would believe that the founding fathers would create a government that could do anything it wants to after having won independence from a government that could do whatever it wanted to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top