Assumptions

I'm curious, why do you believe this? Do you believe this because you were told to believe it?
----------

Leftists like to feel omniscient, I get it. They regurgitate what they are told to say under the expectation of appearing "thuper thmart.". I totally get it.

My question is why do leftists state with certainty things that obviously aren't known by anybody, much less by them? Have I raised the bar on intelligence to the point that leftists now feel that omniscience is required to merely get into the game?

Warmizombies claim Global Warming while not realizing that humanity is still not capable of measuring the Earth's temperature to any usable accuracy. Climate lemmings keep referring to the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere and in the ocean as though they know those values exactly, with zero error. Warmizombies are forever claiming exact average temperatures for Venus. Leftists believe there is such a thing a "paleoclimatology" and totally buy into bogus charts pretending to graph temperatures of the unobserved, distant past.

I could go on all day.

Behind every claim of omniscience is a stupid person. Why are leftists so stupid?

I love when you thank yourself twice, Sybil. It proves you are weak.

As for hydrogen, it's the simplest element and came about after the Big Bang. Do you believe something else?

https://www.thenakedscientists.com/articles/questions/how-old-atom-say-hydrogen
Question
How old is an Atom (say hydrogen)?

Answer
...So, most hydrogen atoms are 13.7 billion years old as they were formed in the Big Bang.
 
It's always fun to read your posts when you try to talk science.
It is very interesting to read this from a scientifically illiterate dullard who is too cowardly to discuss science with me because he knows that any science I teach him will be displayed publicly for all to see that he was never any sort of authority in the first place.

It is very interesting watching you display the very desperation to falsely appear "thuper thmart" that I discuss in this thread.

Why don't you blast me with your science acumen? Oh, that's right, you already have! You don't know anything.

Well, let me know when something changes and you want to discuss some aspect of science. Oh, crap! You don't even know what science is. I shouldn't wait for this to ever happen, should I?

I have an idea, let me know when you can articulate a coherent reason a rational adult should believe in your Global Warming religion, and I'll trash your arguments free of charge, i.e. on the house. Consider it a service I provide because that's the kind of guy I am. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

giphy.gif
giphy.gif
 
As for hydrogen, it's the simplest element and came about after the Big Bang.
This is your moment to shine. Tell me why you believe there was a Big Bang. Are you operating under the misconception that the Big Bang is somehow "thettled thienth"?

Do you believe something else?
Am I required to have a belief on the matter?

How old is an Atom (say hydrogen)?
I always just check the hydrogen atom's metadata tags and check its place and date of birth? I work smarter, not harder.

...So, most hydrogen atoms are 13.7 billion years old as they were formed in the Big Bang.
So the question is "Why do you believe this?" Do you believe this because you were told to believe it, and you OBEYED? You have to admit, this question is easy, clear and straightforward.

btw, in your statement, you wrote "most hydrogen." Did you not mean "all hydrogen"? If not, what hydrogen are you asserting was created outside that Big Bang that you believe happened?

Oh, let me know if you want me to ask gfm7175 or Cypress to ask you the same question as well since they are my socks.
 
Basic science.
Incorrect. Hint: Science predicts nature, i.e. future tense, given a cause, what will be the effect. Science cannot speak to the past.

Theories such as Big Bang and (Darwin's) Evolution are not science. They might be really neat theories, but they are simply speculation about the past.

So, try again. Now that you know that Big Bang is not science, does that change anything for you? Do you still believe the speculation of the Big Bang? Why do you believe whatever it is you believe? Is it because you were told to believe it and you OBEYED?

giphy.gif
 
This is your moment to shine. Tell me why you believe there was a Big Bang. Are you operating under the misconception that the Big Bang is somehow "thettled thienth"?


Am I required to have a belief on the matter?


I always just check the hydrogen atom's metadata tags and check its place and date of birth? I work smarter, not harder.


So the question is "Why do you believe this?" Do you believe this because you were told to believe it, and you OBEYED? You have to admit, this question is easy, clear and straightforward.

btw, in your statement, you wrote "most hydrogen." Did you not mean "all hydrogen"? If not, what hydrogen are you asserting was created outside that Big Bang that you believe happened?

Oh, let me know if you want me to ask gfm7175 or Cypress to ask you the same question as well since they are my socks.

Well, you ain't Crypiss's sock. I'd say you're significantly above his intellectual pay-grade. Just an independent observation...
 
Well, you ain't Crypiss's sock. I'd say you're significantly above his intellectual pay-grade. Just an independent observation...
Thank you, but you're not the brain-dead JPP denizen who is too dim-witted to distinguish between different people. He makes it so easy to pull his strings. All I have to do is agree with someone with whom he disagrees, and suddenly I'm that person as well. I can make him dance whenever I wish, so I think I will.

So guess what ... I'm you now as well. I hope you don't mind.
 
Thank you, but you're not the brain-dead JPP denizen who is too dim-witted to distinguish between different people. He makes it so easy to pull his strings. All I have to do is agree with someone with whom he disagrees, and suddenly I'm that person as well. I can make him dance whenever I wish, so I think I will.

So guess what ... I'm you now as well. I hope you don't mind.
Sounds like another poster or two here. Make em' dance till the gay memes appear.

Nah, I'm good. Just for tonight though...
 
It came down due to Reagan telling Gorbochev to tear down that wall.

It really did not. Neither Reagan, nor Gorbachev were directly involved. And just saying "tear down this wall" would not have caused the wall to be torn down.

In fact, tearing down the wall was a side effect of opening the border. When the border was accidentally opened, people started tearing down the wall on their own. The key word in there was accidentally. Reagan did not cause that accident.

Point being is that both Reagan and Trump have been our best modern day presidents in getting things done in a favorable way against our foreign enemies.

There is absolutely no leader on earth that takes trump seriously. You know the open mic where world leaders laughed at trump for being a worthless buffoon, lacking in any backbone, well that is the real view of all world leaders of trump.
 
Well, you ain't Crypiss's sock. I'd say you're significantly above his intellectual pay-grade. Just an independent observation...

More proof you are a boy in an old man suit, son. Sad.

Siding with Sybil against basic science, including NASA which put mankind on the Moon, indicates a very simple, immature mind on your part. Sybil is mentally ill. You, son, are just a spoiled POS.
 
Frank, do you realize that the photon that is "expelled" as you put it, is created at that moment? The creation did not occur thousands of years earlier. Yes, many photons were created thousands of years earlier, but none were/are that photon that is "expelled" right now.

I just took you off IGNORE because of a quoted comment (someone else quoted you) you made that I thought to be interesting and significant.

As for this comment here...I will defer. Perhaps the photon that started deep in the heart of Sol is not the same photon that travels from the sun to our eyes. I do not know...and I am not particularly interested in that aspect. My post was merely to agree that the distances from our sun to our eyes is the distance of the nearest star to our eyes.

I have decided to take an extended time-out from discussions here in the political arena. But I am interested in what people here have to say in the religious discussion area, so let's see how this goes.
 
More proof you are a boy in an old man suit, son. Sad.

Siding with Sybil against basic science, including NASA which put mankind on the Moon, indicates a very simple, immature mind on your part. Sybil is mentally ill. You, son, are just a spoiled POS.

Says the coward...
 
Says the coward...
...said from the safety of your keyboard, Arbie.

Only a pussified little piece of shit like you keeps threatening to beat people up IF they come to you. LOL

The fact remains you shit yourself when I invited you to Texas and I'd let you beat me up. All I asked was that it be recorded. You ran so fast you left a trail of shit behind you, Arbie. :rofl2:
 
...said from the safety of your keyboard, Arbie.

Only a pussified little piece of shit like you keeps threatening to beat people up IF they come to you. LOL

The fact remains you shit yourself when I invited you to Texas and I'd let you beat me up. All I asked was that it be recorded. You ran so fast you left a trail of shit behind you, Arbie. :rofl2:

Face it coward, you're just frightened of me.
I live in your head, all day, every day. You can't quit me. I'm like
that reoccurring nightmare that wakes you in the middle of the night.
You have no balls, you're yellow to the bone. An insult to the human
species. Mr. helicopter pilot/aviation instructor/commercial airline pilot. Lol!!
 
It is very interesting to read this from a scientifically illiterate dullard who is too cowardly to discuss science with me because he knows that any science I teach him will be displayed publicly for all to see that he was never any sort of authority in the first place.

It is very interesting watching you display the very desperation to falsely appear "thuper thmart" that I discuss in this thread.

Why don't you blast me with your science acumen? Oh, that's right, you already have! You don't know anything.

Well, let me know when something changes and you want to discuss some aspect of science. Oh, crap! You don't even know what science is. I shouldn't wait for this to ever happen, should I?

I have an idea, let me know when you can articulate a coherent reason a rational adult should believe in your Global Warming religion, and I'll trash your arguments free of charge, i.e. on the house. Consider it a service I provide because that's the kind of guy I am. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.


Does trolling people on topics you know nothing about ever get boring?
 
Face it coward, you're just frightened of me.
I live in your head, all day, every day. You can't quit me. I'm like
that reoccurring nightmare that wakes you in the middle of the night.
You have no balls, you're yellow to the bone. An insult to the human
species. Mr. helicopter pilot/aviation instructor/commercial airline pilot. Lol!!
Do you feel better now, Arbie? Do you feel manly? Did you get a little chubby pounding that out?
 
I'm curious, why do you believe this? Do you believe this because you were told to believe it?
----------

Leftists like to feel omniscient, I get it. They regurgitate what they are told to say under the expectation of appearing "thuper thmart.". I totally get it.

My question is why do leftists state with certainty things that obviously aren't known by anybody, much less by them? Have I raised the bar on intelligence to the point that leftists now feel that omniscience is required to merely get into the game?

Warmizombies claim Global Warming while not realizing that humanity is still not capable of measuring the Earth's temperature to any usable accuracy. Climate lemmings keep referring to the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere and in the ocean as though they know those values exactly, with zero error. Warmizombies are forever claiming exact average temperatures for Venus. Leftists believe there is such a thing a "paleoclimatology" and totally buy into bogus charts pretending to graph temperatures of the unobserved, distant past.

I could go on all day.

Behind every claim of omniscience is a stupid person. Why are leftists so stupid?

Told to believe it? That makes no sense. Who would tell us to believe that and why would they? Do we follow orders from astrophysicists? Science makes discoveries and releases them to other scientists and sometimes they goes public.
Did someone tell you not to believe in science and global warming? Why did you believe that?
Your slant is obscene and your logic does not exist. Without hate for science and the left, you would have nothing.
 
Back
Top