Assumptions

[AProudLefty]

Too funny! Tell me, how can a human measure the earth's average temperature as of say, 4823 years ago? Walk me through that process.

Were humans the same 4823 years ago?

 

[IBDaMann]

Too funny! Tell me, how can a human measure the earth's average temperature as of say, 4823 years ago? Walk me through that process.

It's called proxy data. Things like isotope fractionation or even tree ring thickness.

I asked you to walk me through the process so that everyone can read, in your own words, just how fucking stupid you are. Explain the process, dumbass. Then I'll jump in and we'll have a party.

 

[IBDaMann]

Were humans the same 4823 years ago?

At what point do Corn Flakes get soggy?

 

[AProudLefty]

At what point do Corn Flakes get soggy?

However long it takes from your mouth to your stomach.

 

[IBDaMann]

At what point do Corn Flakes get soggy?

However long it takes from your mouth to your stomach.

What if they are just sitting in the bowl?

 

[AProudLefty]

What if they are just sitting in the bowl?

Depends. I suggest eating them immediately.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Answer the question, Terry. When did I state my position on the Big Bang?

You're a liar, Sybil. True, I believe it's because you are schizophrenic, but that doesn't make your lies any more true.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

I asked you to walk me through the process so that everyone can read, in your own words, just how fucking stupid you are. Explain the process, dumbass. Then I'll jump in and we'll have a party.

Why? It's not like YOU know anything about it and can "show me up". I'm willing to wager you have never had a stable isotope geochem class...so what are you going to do? LOL.

 

[IBDaMann]

You're a liar.

You're a liar. This is the third time I'm asking you to answer the question, Terry. When did I state my position on the Big Bang?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

You're a liar. This is the third time I'm asking you to answer the question, Terry. When did I state my position on the Big Bang?

Oooh, both faux male bravado and proof of an OCD schizo on the Internet. How fresh! LOL /sarcasm

Either you are as mentally whacked as I believe you to be, Sybil, or you're too fucking stupid to find your own quotes about the Big Bang. Are you 100% certain you never posted about the Big Bang as IBDaMann and not Into the Night?

 

[Cypress]

The hydrogen in my body is roughly 13 billion years old, and dates to the recombination event shortly after the Big Bang.

I'm curious, why do you believe this? Do you believe this because you were told to believe it?

Leftists like to feel omniscient, I get it.

Stars burn hydrogen, but they don't create hydrogen.

Nucleosynthesis theories of the Big Bang predict that hydrogen formed during recombination, about 400 million years after the big bang, when temperatures and energy were low enough for electrons and protons to combine.

If you have an alternative theory, feel free to submit your data and analysis to a reputable peer reviewed Science journal.

It's the current state of scientific knowledge that anyone can know from taking some undergraduate classes in physics and astronomy, and/or investing time reading science journalism.

 

[IBDaMann]

Why?

I explained that in the text that you quoted, and it's irrelevant anyway.

It's not like YOU know anything about it and can "show me up".

I sure do, and I'm going to let you hang yourself by showing that you are a scientifically illiterate moron who is desperate to pass himself off as an authority by omniscience. Actually, you have already done that so you might as well go all the way.

You claimed that your omniscience about the unobserved, distant past is straightforward through "proxy measures" and now are refusing to walk me through this process because the jig is up, and of course you are blaming me for your refusal to support your stupid claims.

You did it to yourself. I didn't have to do anything more than let you step in your own shit.

I'm willing to wager you have never had a stable isotope geochem class..

Great, you're another "biogeochem" nutcase who thinks his WACKY religion is thettled thienth.

Let's start from the top. Let's say that my children want to verify your claim of the earth's average global temperature 3,824 years before present. How would you walk them through the process? Are you going to clam that my children are not smart enough to understand the sacred process because they are not ordained clergy of your faith? Are you going to claim that you can't possibly explain the process to them because they must first believe?

This is your chance to share the SCIENCE of your omniscience with all of JPP, so please just answer the question(s).

 

[Saint Guinefort]

I explained that in the text that you quoted, and it's irrelevant anyway.


I sure do, and I'm going to let you hang yourself by showing that you are a scientifically illiterate moron who is desperate to pass himself off as an authority by omniscience. Actually, you have already done that so you might as well go all the way.

You claimed that your omniscience about the unobserved, distant past is straightforward through "proxy measures" and now are refusing to walk me through this process because the jig is up, and of course you are blaming me for your refusal to support your stupid claims.

You did it to yourself. I didn't have to do anything more than let you step in your own shit.


Great, you're another "biogeochem" nutcase who thinks his WACKY religion is thettled thienth.

Let's start from the top. Let's say that my children want to verify your claim of the earth's average global temperature 3,824 years before present. How would you walk them through the process? Are you going to clam that my children are not smart enough to understand the sacred process because they are not ordained clergy of your faith? Are you going to claim that you can't possibly explain the process to them because they must first believe?

This is your chance to share the SCIENCE of your omniscience with all of JPP, so please just answer the question(s).

You don't know the first foreign thing about stable isotope fractionation. You probably don't even know what an isotope is, let alone the meaning of a"stable isotope".

Just let it go, dude, you are a joke.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I'm curious, why do you believe this? Do you believe this because you were told to believe it?
----------

Leftists like to feel omniscient, I get it. They regurgitate what they are told to say under the expectation of appearing "thuper thmart.". I totally get it.

My question is why do leftists state with certainty things that obviously aren't known by anybody, much less by them? Have I raised the bar on intelligence to the point that leftists now feel that omniscience is required to merely get into the game?

Warmizombies claim Global Warming while not realizing that humanity is still not capable of measuring the Earth's temperature to any usable accuracy. Climate lemmings keep referring to the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere and in the ocean as though they know those values exactly, with zero error. Warmizombies are forever claiming exact average temperatures for Venus. Leftists believe there is such a thing a "paleoclimatology" and totally buy into bogus charts pretending to graph temperatures of the unobserved, distant past.

I could go on all day.

Behind every claim of omniscience is a stupid person. Why are leftists so stupid?

It's the current state of scientific knowledge that anyone can know from taking some undergraduate classes in physics and astronomy, and/or investing time reading science journalism.

Agreed.

The fact he forgot which account he was using for his Big Bang arguments may have confused him.

What Big Bang?

Science is not a government agency. Science is not NASA.
The Theory of the Big Bang is not science either.

NASA is currently unable to land anyone on the Moon, or even send any manned craft anywhere.
NASA didn't land anyone on the Moon. Neil Armstrong did.

 

[IBDaMann]

It's the current state of scientific knowledge that anyone can know from taking some undergraduate classes in physics and astronomy, and/or investing time reading science journalism.

Nope. Omniscience is not the current state of scientific knowledge. There are no college physics classes covering omniscience models or omniscience theory.

Try again.

You are welcome to walk me through your process for determining the age of a hydrogen atom. I'm listening.

 

[AProudLefty]

Nope. Omniscience is not the current state of scientific knowledge. There are no college physics classes covering omniscience models or omniscience theory.

Try again.

You are welcome to walk me through your process for determining the age of a hydrogen atom. I'm listening.

Where did hydrogen atoms come from?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Where did hydrogen atoms come from?

He's not sure but it happens every time he eats six bean burritos from Taco Bell.

 

[IBDaMann]

Too funny! Tell me, how can a human measure the earth's average temperature as of say, 4823 years ago? Walk me through that process.

It's called proxy data. Things like isotope fractionation or even tree ring thickness.

I asked you to walk me through the process so that everyone can read, in your own words, just how fucking stupid you are. Explain the process, dumbass. Then I'll jump in and we'll have a party.

Why? It's not like YOU know anything about it and can "show me up".

You claimed that your omniscience about the unobserved, distant past is straightforward through "proxy measures" and now are refusing to walk me through this process because the jig is up, and of course, you are blaming me for your refusal to support your stupid claims.

Let's start from the top. Let's say that my children want to verify your claim of the earth's average global temperature 3,824 years before present. How would you walk them through the process? Are you going to claim that my children are not smart enough to understand the sacred process because they are not ordained clergy of your faith? Are you going to claim that you can't possibly explain the process to them because they must first believe?

This is your chance to share the SCIENCE of your omniscience with all of JPP, so please just answer the question(s).

Just let it go, dude, you are a joke.

I think your EVASION speaks for itself. You are a devout worshiper of an omniscience dogma that you call "paleoclimatology." You are desperate for others to believe that you are somehow an authority in science rather than see you for the pathetic, scientifically illiterate moron that you are.

You are not omniscient. Your omniscience is not assumed. Your claims of omniscience are summarily dismissed. Your conclusions drawn from your claimed omniscience as well as your "paleoclimatology" religion of omniscience are summarily discarded.

 

[IBDaMann]

Where did hydrogen atoms come from?

What clues have you garnered from your experience with hydrogen atoms?

 

[AProudLefty]

What clues have you garnered from your experience with hydrogen atoms?

I am asking you since you are omniscient.