Assumptions

[Dutch Uncle]

What clues have you garnered from your experience with hydrogen atoms?

I am asking you since you are omniscient.

He can also burp out the alphabet after drinking a Tab.

 

[Cypress]

Nope. Omniscience is not the current state of scientific knowledge. There are no college physics classes covering omniscience models or omniscience theory.

Try again.

You are welcome to walk me through your process for determining the age of a hydrogen atom. I'm listening.

I just told you.
The current state of scientific knowledge is that the temperature and energy of the early universe was to high for atoms to exist. Elementary subatomic particles were basically in a state of plasma. It took about 400k years for the temperature and energy in the universe drop to where recombination allowed electrons and protons to combine through the electrical force to create hydrogen atoms.

If you have an alternative theory, feel free to have your lab submit your data and conclusions to a peer reviewed scientific journal.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

I think your EVASION speaks for itself. You are a devout worshiper of an omniscience dogma that you call "paleoclimatology." You are desperate for others to believe that you are somehow an authority in science rather than see you for the pathetic, scientifically illiterate moron that you are.

You are not omniscient. Your omniscience is not assumed. Your claims of omniscience are summarily dismissed. Your conclusions drawn from your claimed omniscience as well as your "paleoclimatology" religion of omniscience are summarily discarded.

You know, a simple "Rocks for Jocks" class would do you a world of good. You might actually learn how earth science works.

 

[Into the Night]

wrong.

Then define it.

 

[Into the Night]

^^^
Says Mr. Know-It-All who claims the Big Bang didn't happen and NASA is a tool of the federal government.

How do you know the Big Bang DID happen? Remember, you were around to see it.
NASA is not just a tool of the federal government. It IS part of the federal government, dumbass.

 

[Into the Night]

LOL Quotes would be nice, but I know not to expect actual evidence out of you, Sybil.

You can't quote yourself??

 

[Into the Night]

It's called proxy data. Things like isotope fractionation or even tree ring thickness.

No such thing as 'proxy data'. Data is a direct measurement, not someone's made up interpretation.

Trees don't measure temperature. They have no temperature sensors.
Isotopes don't measure temperature.

 

[Into the Night]

You're a liar, Sybil. True, I believe it's because you are schizophrenic, but that doesn't make your lies any more true.

Yes, Sybil or Dutch or any of your other socks...you are a liar. Whether you believe you are schizophrenic is your own problem. I don't think you even know what the word means. You do tend to suffer from a lot of hallucinations though.

 

[Into the Night]

Why? It's not like YOU know anything about it and can "show me up". I'm willing to wager you have never had a stable isotope geochem class...so what are you going to do? LOL.

No such class. Buzzword fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Oooh, both faux male bravado and proof of an OCD schizo on the Internet. How fresh! LOL /sarcasm

Either you are as mentally whacked as I believe you to be, Sybil, or you're too fucking stupid to find your own quotes about the Big Bang. Are you 100% certain you never posted about the Big Bang as IBDaMann and not Into the Night?

He doesn't have access to my account and I don't have access to his.
Evasion. Answer the question put to you.

 

[Trumpet]

Into the Scum is back

 

[Into the Night]

It's the current state of scientific knowledge that anyone can know from taking some undergraduate classes in physics and astronomy, and/or investing time reading science journalism.

Religion isn't science. Science isn't a journal, class, book, pamphlet, website, magazine, university, college, school, government agency, license, degree, paper, research, or data.
Science has no theories about past unobserved events.

The Theory of the Big Bang is not science. It is religion.

 

[Into the Night]

You don't know the first foreign thing about stable isotope fractionation. You probably don't even know what an isotope is, let alone the meaning of a"stable isotope".

Just let it go, dude, you are a joke.

Buzzword fallacies. There is no such thing as 'stable isotop fractionation'. Inversion fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

Buzzword fallacies. There is no such thing as 'stable isotop fractionation'. Inversion fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

JUST. STOP. LYING.

Here's this is all about Stable Isotope Fractionation.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topic...xt=where “n” is the number of atoms exchanged.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

No such class. Buzzword fallacy.

PLEASE. STOP. LYING.

"GEOL-G 483 - Isotope Geochemistry
Credits: 3Description: Spring. Introduction to the theory and application of radiogenic and stable isotopes to a variety of subdisciplines in the earth sciences. Topics include geochronology, tracers, mass balance and mixing, hydrology and environmental applications, water-rock interaction, and biogeochemical cycles.Prerequisite: CHEM-C106 with a minimum grade of C- or consent of instructor."
https://science.iupui.edu/earthsciences/academics/course-descriptions.html?page=3

GEOL 583 - Isotope Geochemistry
Description:
Covers principles of isotope geochemistry and applications to studies of geological processes such as hydrologic cycling, volcanic petrogenesis, and climate change. Three hours lecture per week and required laboratory work and field trips. GEOL 483 and GEOL 583 are layered courses; students may not receive credit for both. Offered in alternate years.
https://catalog.acalog.cwu.edu/preview_course_nopop.php?catoid=61&coid=143689

Stable Isotope Geochemistry
Spring 2018: Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays | 12:00PM - 12:50PM
VIEW COURSE SYLLABUS
A survey of the chemical, physical and biological mechanisms and fundamental concepts of stable isotope fractionation. The course will focus on applications of H, O, C, S, N and trace metal (i.e., Fe and Mo) isotopes to geologic problems with an emphasis on climate change and ancient ocean chemistries.
https://isen.northwestern.edu/stable-isotope-geochemistry



So do you want to just admit you lie all the time or are you just that ignorant?

 

[IBDaMann]

I just told you.

Are you going to start mindlessly chanting now?

The current state of scientific knowledge is that the temperature and energy of the early universe was to high for atoms to exist.

That is not science. That is unverifiable speculation about the past. You apparently still don't know what science is and have no intention of learning. I'll get you started ...

Science predicts nature, i.e. future tense. Science has nothing to say about the past. Science does not speculate. Science does not "suggest." Science predicts. If it doesn't predict nature, it isn't science. The Big Bang is unverified speculation ... but you claim to know that it occurred, beyond it being mere speculation. Explain the process by which my children may verify your claims. Make sure that the process does not require omniscience.

Elementary subatomic particles were basically in a state of plasma.

Explain the process by which my children may verify your claims. Make sure that the process does not require omniscience.

It took about 400k years for the temperature and energy in the universe drop to where recombination allowed electrons and protons to combine through the electrical force to create hydrogen atoms.

Explain the process by which my children may verify your claims. Make sure that the process does not require omniscience.

If you have an alternative theory, feel free to have your lab submit your data and conclusions to a peer reviewed scientific journal.

I am so glad you went there. Tell me, why would any rational adult do this? Do you believe that "peer reviewed" has anything to do with science? Do you think that some scientific journal somehow owns science and that someone's permission/approval is somehow needed for science to exist? Why would any rational adult even consider doing what you suggested I do?

Bonus question: Who approved Einstein's Theory of Relativity to be science?

 

[Into the Night]

I just told you.

You spewed some scripture, nothing more.

The current state of scientific knowledge

Science doesn't have a 'state'.

is that the temperature and energy of the early universe was to high for atoms to exist.

So you just said that something that has no mass has a temperature! Hilarious!
Were you there? Did you see this? Oh, that's right...you couldn't have been there! Omniscience fallacy. Religion is not science.

Elementary subatomic particles were basically in a state of plasma.

And since YOU would've been plasma, you obviously didn't see this. Science is not religion.

It took about 400k years for the temperature and energy in the universe drop to where recombination allowed electrons and protons to combine through the electrical force to create hydrogen atoms.

And you measured this, did you? Omniscience fallacy. Science is not religion.

If you have an alternative theory,

There are several alternative theories, including the Theory of the Continuum.

feel free to have your lab submit your data and conclusions to a peer reviewed scientific journal.

You have no data. All theories have conclusions, since all theories are explanatory arguments. Science is not a journal or a magazine. Science does not use consensus. It has no voting bloc.

 

[Into the Night]

You know, a simple "Rocks for Jocks" class would do you a world of good. You might actually learn how earth science works.

Earth is not a science. Earth is a planet. Buzzword fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

JUST. STOP. LYING.

Here's this is all about Stable Isotope Fractionation.

Holy Links are not a proof. Holy Links are not science. There is no such thing as 'stable isotope fractionation'. Buzzword fallacy.

 

[IBDaMann]

Yes, Sybil or Dutch or any of your other socks...you are a liar. Whether you believe you are schizophrenic is your own problem. I don't think you even know what the word means. You do tend to suffer from a lot of hallucinations though.

I just learned that Terry had a traumatic experience in Junior High which prompted subsequent heavy, prolonged drug use which is likely the cause of her being as stupid as she is and of her inability to simply distinguish between different people. We've had discussions about how AI is advancing in the area of recognition, e.g. facial recognition, voice recognition, character/symbol recognition but Terry has actually lost her corresponding human abilities as her intelligence degraded into a persistent vegetative state.

It's sad, but it's why Terry shouldn't be expected to make any sense, and if she ever does, it will be a random, non-repeatable accident.