Assumptions

IBDaMann said:
I understand. It would require too much red tape and too much time bent over furniture to get an approved response from the slave-masters.

Don't worry, you have already made it perfectly clear that you will never support the WACKY claims that you are ordered to regurgitate ... so my work is done here.

... and to think you call others "LIAR!" Way too funny.
Click to expand...

I'll take this as your public confession that you have no data, no theories, no measurements that are acceptable for peer reviewed publication which provide an alternative explanation to the currently accepted theories of nucleosynthesis, recombination, cosmic expansion.

You should have just started the thead out admitting you were way out of your league
 
Cypress said:
I'll take this as your public confession that you have no data, no theories, no measurements that are acceptable for peer reviewed publication which provide an alternative explanation to the currently accepted theories of nucleosynthesis, recombination, cosmic expansion.

You should have just started the thead out admitting you were way out of your league
Click to expand...

You are being too polite.
 
Doc Dutch said:
Good plan. Lots of the nutjobs like to shovel a ton of shit on people and then declare victory when people can't answer every question put to them. Crazy, eh? LOL
Click to expand...

I don't answer "questions" that can't fit into a Twitter sized post. And I rarely invest time discussing whether evolution and the Big Bang are real, whether Elvis faked his death, or whether Hillary ran a sex trafficking gang out of a pizza parlor.
 
Cypress said:
I don't answer "questions" that can't fit into a Twitter sized post. And I rarely invest time discussing whether evolution and the Big Bang are real, whether Elvis faked his death, or whether Hillary ran a sex trafficking gang out of a pizza parlor.
Click to expand...

The Psychos and the Dumbasses truly believe that if they can't impress people with facts then they'll dazzle them with bullshit.

Sybil is a psycho.
 
Sybil the Sycho said:
62un7x.gif
Click to expand...

You should ask your caretaker for better medication, Sybil. :thup:
 
Into the Night said:
Nah. It's YOUR problem. YOU are the one discarding science and mathematics. YOU are the one claiming your religion is 'science'. YOU are the one throwing buzzwords around to try to impress people.
Click to expand...

You were shown the truth, the fact that you continue means you are lying.

Lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie. Are you able to speak truthfully on ANYTHING?
 
Into the Night said:
So you freely admit that you can't answer the question to you. Gotit.
Click to expand...

The answer is so obvious to the scientifically literate it scarcely is even worth putting on the table for discussion.

Hydrogen formed at recombination, and because we have measured the Hubble constant we can extrapolate the approximate age of the Big Bang.


There just isn't a lot of upside in using valuable time to teach elementary scientific concepts to random ignoramuses on the internet.
 
Cypress said:
I'll take this as your public confession that you have no data, no theories, no measurements that are acceptable for peer reviewed publication which provide an alternative explanation to the currently accepted theories of nucleosynthesis, recombination, cosmic expansion.
Click to expand...
No. You cannot take anything that I have written previously on JPP as just such a confession.

This, on the other hand, is my confession: I do not have any article prepared for submission to any periodical at this time.

There you go. No charge. If there is ever anything I can do for you, don't hesitate to let me know.

Cypress said:
You should have just started the thead out admitting you were way out of your league
Click to expand...
I am happy to admit that JPP is the children's table where desperate, scientifically illiterate morons, such as yourself, come to role-play being "thuper-thmart perthonth" on the mistaken assumption that no adults, such as myself, will ever be reading the crap.

You still have not walked me through your process for determining the age of a given hydrogen atom. I hope you can recall your insistence that your declarations of knowing the ages of hydrogen atoms was not attributed to omniscience but is, in fact, the state of modern science. Now you're stuck because you really were claiming omniscience when you made that claim and now you are desperate to change the subject away from the ball that is now in your court.

All eyes are still on you. If I were to hand you a hydrogen atom, how, exactly, would you determine its age? Walk me through that process.
 
Cypress said:
I don't answer "questions" that can't fit into a Twitter sized post. And I rarely invest time discussing whether evolution and the Big Bang are real, whether Elvis faked his death, or whether Hillary ran a sex trafficking gang out of a pizza parlor.
Click to expand...

You don't answer ANY questions. You evade them just like Dutch.
 
Cypress said:
The answer is so obvious to the scientifically literate it scarcely is even worth putting on the table for discussion.
Click to expand...
You discard science. Religion isn't science.
Cypress said:
Hydrogen formed at recombination, and because we have measured the Hubble constant we can extrapolate the approximate age of the Big Bang.
Click to expand...
Spewing religious scripture again. Religion isn't science. Omniscience fallacy.
Cypress said:
There just isn't a lot of upside in using valuable time to teach elementary scientific concepts to random ignoramuses on the internet.
Click to expand...
Religion isn't science.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top