Assumptions

[Into the Night]

PLEASE. STOP. LYING.

"GEOL-G 483 - Isotope Geochemistry
Credits: 3Description: Spring. Introduction to the theory and application of radiogenic and stable isotopes to a variety of subdisciplines in the earth sciences. Topics include geochronology, tracers, mass balance and mixing, hydrology and environmental applications, water-rock interaction, and biogeochemical cycles.Prerequisite: CHEM-C106 with a minimum grade of C- or consent of instructor."
https://science.iupui.edu/earthsciences/academics/course-descriptions.html?page=3

GEOL 583 - Isotope Geochemistry
Description:
Covers principles of isotope geochemistry and applications to studies of geological processes such as hydrologic cycling, volcanic petrogenesis, and climate change. Three hours lecture per week and required laboratory work and field trips. GEOL 483 and GEOL 583 are layered courses; students may not receive credit for both. Offered in alternate years.
https://catalog.acalog.cwu.edu/preview_course_nopop.php?catoid=61&coid=143689

Stable Isotope Geochemistry
Spring 2018: Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays | 12:00PM - 12:50PM
VIEW COURSE SYLLABUS
A survey of the chemical, physical and biological mechanisms and fundamental concepts of stable isotope fractionation. The course will focus on applications of H, O, C, S, N and trace metal (i.e., Fe and Mo) isotopes to geologic problems with an emphasis on climate change and ancient ocean chemistries.
https://isen.northwestern.edu/stable-isotope-geochemistry



So do you want to just admit you lie all the time or are you just that ignorant?

I do not consider religion a college class in science.

 

[IBDaMann]

Into the Scum is back

Thank you. Trumpet chips in a shaming (#2) without any other contribution.

I appreciate the support, guys.

 

[Trumpet]

Thank you. Trumpet chips in a shaming (#2) without any other contribution.

I appreciate the support, guys.

Well thank you sir.

 

[Into the Night]

I just learned that Terry had a traumatic experience in Junior High which prompted subsequent heavy, prolonged drug use which is likely the cause of her being as stupid as she is and of her inability to simply distinguish between different people. We've had discussions about how AI is advancing in the area of recognition, e.g. facial recognition, voice recognition, character/symbol recognition but Terry has actually lost her corresponding human abilities as her intelligence degraded into a persistent vegetative state.

It's sad, but it's why Terry shouldn't be expected to make any sense, and if she ever does, it will be a random, non-repeatable accident.

So, are you saying that Terry (aka Dutch), is an example of AUI (Artificial UnIntelligence)?

 

[IBDaMann]

[evasion of methodology for verifying his stupid claims]

So, nothing has changed, right? You are still a scientifically illiterate, intellectual coward who can't support his WACKY religious claims, apparently.

Again, let me know when something changes.

 

[IBDaMann]

So, are you saying that Terry (aka Dutch), is an example of AUI (Artificial UnIntelligence)?

Not exactly. Terry is the poster child for Deep Unlearning.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

I do not consider religion a college class in science.

You just lie all the time, don't you?

 

[Saint Guinefort]

So, nothing has changed, right? You are still a scientifically illiterate, intellectual coward who can't support his WACKY religious claims, apparently.

Again, let me know when something changes.

You wouldn't know science literacy if it bit you in the ass.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

Holy Links are not a proof. Holy Links are not science. There is no such thing as 'stable isotope fractionation'. Buzzword fallacy.

Lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies. Your posts are nothing but lies or ignorance.

You shouldn't be proud to be a liar or an ignoramus, but you seem to be.

LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIESLIES LIES LIES LIES LIESLIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES

 

[IBDaMann]

Lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies. Your posts are nothing but lies or ignorance.

You shouldn't be proud to be a liar or an ignoramus, but you seem to be.

LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIESLIES LIES LIES LIES LIESLIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES

Wow, look how close to home Into the Night hit! Did he sink your battleship?

 

[Saint Guinefort]

Wow, look how close to home Into the Night hit! Did he sink your battleship?

I provided proof of his lies.

Do you not believe in isotope fractionation as well?

Moron.

 

[Cypress]

Are you going to start mindlessly chanting now?


That is not science. That is unverifiable speculation about the past. You apparently still don't know what science is and have no intention of learning. I'll get you started ...

Science predicts nature, i.e. future tense. Science has nothing to say about the past. Science does not speculate. Science does not "suggest." Science predicts. If it doesn't predict nature, it isn't science. The Big Bang is unverified speculation ... but you claim to know that it occurred, beyond it being mere speculation. Explain the process by which my children may verify your claims. Make sure that the process does not require omniscience.


Explain the process by which my children may verify your claims. Make sure that the process does not require omniscience.


Explain the process by which my children may verify your claims. Make sure that the process does not require omniscience.


I am so glad you went there. Tell me, why would any rational adult do this? Do you believe that "peer reviewed" has anything to do with science? Do you think that some scientific journal somehow owns science and that someone's permission/approval is somehow needed for science to exist? Why would any rational adult even consider doing what you suggested I do?

Bonus question: Who approved Einstein's Theory of Relativity to be science?

I don't generally read or respond to text walls and word salad.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

He doesn't have access to my account and I don't have access to his.
Evasion. Answer the question put to you.

What question? Put by whom, Sybil? Your sock IBDaMann?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I don't generally read or respond to text walls and word salad.

Good plan. Lots of the nutjobs like to shovel a ton of shit on people and then declare victory when people can't answer every question put to them. Crazy, eh? LOL

 

[IBDaMann]

I don't generally read or respond to text walls and word salad.

I understand. It would require too much red tape and too much time bent over furniture to get an approved response from the slave-masters.

Don't worry, you have already made it perfectly clear that you will never support the WACKY claims that you are ordered to regurgitate ... so my work is done here.

... and to think you call others "LIAR!" Way too funny.

 

[Into the Night]

You just lie all the time, don't you?

Nah. It's YOUR problem. YOU are the one discarding science and mathematics. YOU are the one claiming your religion is 'science'. YOU are the one throwing buzzwords around to try to impress people.

 

[Into the Night]

You wouldn't know science literacy if it bit you in the ass.

Religion is not science, dude.

 

[Into the Night]

Lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies. Your posts are nothing but lies or ignorance.

You shouldn't be proud to be a liar or an ignoramus, but you seem to be.

LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIESLIES LIES LIES LIES LIESLIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES

So decide to just mindlessly chant. It doesn't make your religion a theory of science, dude.

 

[Into the Night]

Wow, look how close to home Into the Night hit! Did he sink your battleship?

Apparently.

 

[Into the Night]

I provided proof of his lies.

Do you not believe in isotope fractionation as well?

Moron.

Holy Links are not a proof. There is no such thing a 'stable isotope fractionation'.