right.You should read the book, taker.
Says someone who has never read the book. The "oligarchs" that stopped producing were using gold based currency and rejected the fiat currency... Do all takers think they are brilliant when they just pretend to read a book?right.
oligarchs are the vicitms.
shrug and take your shit and go, baby oligarch.
many are not even actually innovative. they just have central fiat currency bankers as partners.
do all dumb libertarians deny the power of fiat currency totalitarianism.
make an argument.
What is your take on electronic currency like Bitcoin or Trump's Crypto Coin?Says someone who has never read the book. The "oligarchs" that stopped producing were using gold based currency and rejected the fiat currency... Do all takers think they are brilliant when they just pretend to read a book?
ok. the book also villainized gold.Says someone who has never read the book. The "oligarchs" that stopped producing were using gold based currency and rejected the fiat currency... Do all takers think they are brilliant when they just pretend to read a book?
these are still fiat currencies.What is your take on electronic currency like Bitcoin or Trump's Crypto Coin?
Now I question your sanity. The book did not "villainize" gold. You've gotten two of the central themes wrong. If you read the book you didn't comprehend it. I get skipping the long-winded speeches... those are the boring parts... but misunderstanding the entire thing then proving it here by literally saying the book says the opposite of its central points... , that's a you thing,ok. the book also villainized gold.
that's consistent.
the good people used fiat currency for ongoing creative "power" the energy of Lucifer.
this is the Illuminati narrative.
you said the non producers stuck to gold.Now I question your sanity. The book did not "villainize" gold. You've gotten two of the central themes wrong. If you read the book you didn't comprehend it. I get skipping the long-winded speeches... those are the boring parts... but misunderstanding the entire thing then proving it here by literally saying the book says the opposite of its central points... , that's a you thing,
I said the producers who left the fiat society due to the takers traded in gold. Again, you prove you have literally never read the book and have nothing to really say.you said the non producers stuck to gold.
God for themselves when they bug out.I said the producers who left the fiat society due to the takers traded in gold. Again, you prove you have literally never read the book and have nothing to really say.
It's like saying Cat in the Hat isn't good because it didn't rhyme and was about a creature wearing pants. Someone who thinks math is "dumb" because 5+5 is a mystery to them... Seriously, read the book before giving an opinion.
Seriously, the only thing you have demonstrated here is that you have an opinion about subjects on which you are ignorant. You don't know the premise, the concepts, what the book says, even the players in the book. Complete ignorance. Maybe you think you are being "deep"... I'm not sure what you are doing here. I advise you to read the book before making bold arguments based on a paragraph long book report you've read.God for themselves when they bug out.
of course.
thats not exactly true.Seriously, the only thing you have demonstrated here is that you have an opinion about subjects on which you are ignorant. You don't know the premise, the concepts, what the book says, even the players in the book. Complete ignorance. Maybe you think you are being "deep"... I'm not sure what you are doing here. I advise you to read the book before making bold arguments based on a paragraph long book report you've read.