Barr’s Hatchet Job

Gonzomin said:
Barr is the fucking Atty General. He is not the president's lawyer or his private detective. He is supposed to be running the American justice system. He is wandering abroad trying to find evidence of some crimes that are on Daffy's wish list. He is not doing the job he was appointed for. He is not doing the AG job. He is acting as Trump's investigator. We have 19 agencies that actually do that job.
Barr should be removed. We have no AG but instead a Trump operative in a very powerful office.
The American AG is wandering Europe looking for crimes. I guess we have none here.
Click to expand...

:hand::hand::hand::hand::hand:
 
Gonzomin said:
Barr is the fucking Atty General. He is not the president's lawyer or his private detective. He is supposed to be running the American justice system. He is wandering abroad trying to find evidence of some crimes that are on Daffy's wish list. He is not doing the job he was appointed for. He is not doing the AG job. He is acting as Trump's investigator. We have 19 agencies that actually do that job.
Barr should be removed. We have no AG but instead a Trump operative in a very powerful office.
The American AG is wandering Europe looking for crimes. I guess we have none here.
Click to expand...
horse hockey.
Is the FBI Trump's? DoJ is independent ( FBI is part of DOJ).
I bet you had no problem with Comey and the FBI investigation into Trump?

we've already see irregularities by the first Horowitz report -should they be ignored?
And IT'S NOT JUST BARR -John Durham is part of this predicate investigation.

Live by the sword - die by the sword
 
More from the article.

< Every aspect of the Crowdstrike conspiracy tale has been disproved. But this has not stopped Trump from demanding that Zelensky looks into it, albeit in a somewhat incoherent manner, in the now infamous 25 July call to the Ukrainian president ...

“I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike. I guess you have one of your wealthy people. The server, they say Ukraine has it,” said the US president, according to notes of the conversation, released by the White House. In another part of the call Trump tells Zelensky “they say” Mueller “started with Ukraine”. >

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...russia-mueller-ukraine-zelensky-a9181641.html

Er, who "they"?
 
countryboy said:
Gee, a leftist lunatic Euro-weenie smears a legitimate investigation into leftist corruption. I'm shocked, SHOCKED I TELL YA.

Of course, being the partisan hack you are, you run with this without any knowledge of what is actually being investigated, or any of the underlying reasoning. Libs are lazy AF.
Click to expand...

' legitimate investigation into leftist corruption" What a joke
 
remember that the republicans pretend how the Investigation into Russia was started without real cause


Its illegal to start an investigation without facts


there are no facts to back an investigation into the Bidens
 
dukkha said:
horse hockey.
Is the FBI Trump's? DoJ is independent ( FBI is part of DOJ).
I bet you had no problem with Comey and the FBI investigation into Trump?

we've already see irregularities by the first Horowitz report -should they be ignored?
And IT'S NOT JUST BARR -John Durham is part of this predicate investigation.

Live by the sword - die by the sword
Click to expand...

Barr is TRAITOR


HE HAS BROKEN HIS OATH TO THE PEOPLE AND IS TRYING TO PROTECT RUSSIA
 
Bill Barr is Trump's Gestapo Chief and not an Attorney General, and this is but a mindless vendetta investigation, without concern to the damage that this will do to our vital intelligence dept. For an other example of Trump's hatchet job style of justice, just look at Andrew McCabe.
 
Trumpet said:
Bill Barr is Trump's Gestapo Chief and not an Attorney General, and this is but a mindless vendetta investigation, without concern to the damage that this will do to our vital intelligence dept. For an other example of Trump's hatchet job style of justice, just look at Andrew McCabe.
Click to expand...
ROFL.. McCabe was fired for lying..
 
dukkha said:
^ the predicate,and also the methodology. whatever happened to Horowitz?
~~

The OP is pure trash, written as a bunch of cooked up conspiracy theories.
In REALITY. Barr and Durham are doing the legwork for both the methods and the predicate.
Durham is a solid investigator, non-political,he's not going to jump thru anyone's hoops
Click to expand...
It’s funny, the claim has been made about so many in the Trump administration, and it’s been proven wrong.
 
Hello Darth,

Darth Omar said:
Well, as a result of Democrats latest impeachment mission, it’s come to light how strange a place Ukraine is lol.

Lots of democrats have been mixed up in Ukraine over the years. Tony Podesta got sucked up by Mullet in the Russian sweep but Mullet didn’t charge him and referred his case to NY prosecutors. Kind of unusual, that. It’s a matter of record that Ukraine meddled AGAINST Trump in 2016 and since Mullet had the ‘Russian blinders’ on, it’s never really been subject to a thorough investigation.

So Trump politely asked Zelensky to investigate it and now we know Barr has been over there talking to them. Also, there are sources who claim that the WB was Biden’s point man on Ukrainian matters.

Odd coincidence, that. Do you see a problem with getting to the bottom of it?
Click to expand...

I'll identify some warning alarms that are going off as I read your post.

"got sucked up by Mullet in the Russian sweep" The man's name is Mueller. That you can't even grant a person his own name causes me to wonder what other inaccuracies plague your thinking.

And it was not a 'sweep.' It was an investigation.

"...since Mullet had the ‘Russian blinders’ on..." You have no proof of this. Mueller was highly praised with a strong reputation of impartiality by both parties at the time of his appointment. Republican resentment of his investigation only surfaced after Trump dictated by tweet that Mueller should be ridiculed. At first, Trump claimed he was cooperating fully. Trump didn't 'go-off' on Mueller for the first few weeks. Of course, that was but a ruse and didn't last.

For non-partisan viewers, Mueller conducted a fair and thorough investigation. The only people who don't think so are die-hard Trump fans.

"So Trump politely asked Zelensky to investigate it " (After impolitely cutting off the military aid the country was depending on for it's survival.)
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello Darth,



I'll identify some warning alarms that are going off as I read your post.

"got sucked up by Mullet in the Russian sweep" The man's name is Mueller. That you can't even grant a person his own name causes me to wonder what other inaccuracies plague your thinking.

And it was not a 'sweep.' It was an investigation.

"...since Mullet had the ‘Russian blinders’ on..." You have no proof of this. Mueller was highly praised with a strong reputation of impartiality by both parties at the time of his appointment. Republican resentment of his investigation only surfaced after Trump dictated by tweet that Mueller should be ridiculed. At first, Trump claimed he was cooperating fully. Trump didn't 'go-off' on Mueller for the first few weeks. Of course, that was but a ruse and didn't last.

For non-partisan viewers, Mueller conducted a fair and thorough investigation. The only people who don't think so are die-hard Trump fans.

"So Trump politely asked Zelensky to investigate it " (After impolitely cutting off the military aid the country was depending on for it's survival.)
Click to expand...
military aid was not cut off, it was delivered by the deadline without a quid pro quo
( Zelensky did nothing Trump wanted and still got the aid.)

Mueller did not look at the predicate for the FBI counterintelligence investigation -
which is what Barr/Durham are now doing
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top