Biden Signs Executive Order to Ramp Up Gun Control

[Dutch Uncle]

Which board members are you claiming have murdered other Americans?

Have you contacted Joe Biden's STASI with your evidence?

Didn't you Down Under Dumbasses give up your guns?

 

[PostmodernProphet]

When you have to put words in my mouth, you lose. Loser.

you mean like saying he wanted to give everyone a gun and let them shoot it out.......you may be right, it DID make you look like a loser....

 

[PostmodernProphet]

one thing no one seems to take into consideration......guns did not create the situation we currently see in places like Chicago......

 

[Matt Dillon]

Biden wants to destroy the second amendment. Biden and democrats hate the constitution and how it limits government


https://www.theepochtimes.com/biden...utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=BonginoReport

Not gonna fly. There's evidence he's a traitor as well.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Oh..... I see. The cops are not good guys. So we need vigilantes like you.

so you like being a helpless victim, got it.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

My God, you are a fucking moron.

only a complete fucking moron would believe that the founders would create a LIMITED and RESTRICTED government with a Constitution and then turn the power to define those limits and restrictions to the very government they created. in other words, you're a complete fucking moron.

 

[Lionfish]

 

[Concart]

only a complete fucking moron would believe that the founders would create a LIMITED and RESTRICTED government with a Constitution and then turn the power to define those limits and restrictions to the very government they created. in other words, you're a complete fucking moron.

So the Supreme Court is made up of a bunch of fucking morons but YOU are here to save the day. Got it. Thanks, hero!!!

 

[Concart]

so you like being a helpless victim, got it.

Hardly. I own two guns. I don’t carry them around like I’m Wyatt fucking Earp. Because, you know, I feel adequate.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

So the Supreme Court is made up of a bunch of fucking morons but YOU are here to save the day. Got it. Thanks, hero!!!

don't get all pissy because i'm right and you know it.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Hardly. I own two guns. I don’t carry them around like I’m Wyatt fucking Earp. Because, you know, I feel adequate.

so, tell us oh great adequate one, when out at the grocery store, what the fuck are you going to do if a mass shooting occurs?

 

[Mason Michaels]

Biden wants to destroy the second amendment. Biden and democrats hate the constitution and how it limits government


https://www.theepochtimes.com/biden...utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=BonginoReport

STFU troll

 

[Into the Night]

Oh..... I see. The cops are not good guys. So we need vigilantes like you.

The cops were not good guys in Uvalde. They stood by and listened as kids were being shot.

 

[Into the Night]

"Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited.

It is unlimited. The 2nd amendment does not specify any limit whatsoever. There is no limit by caliber, size of magazine, type of action, brand name, how 'scary looking' the weapon is, size of weapon, color of weapon, whether it's used by the military or not, etc.

It is unlimited. ANY KIND OF ARMS. ANY KIND OF WEAPON.

From Blackstone through the 19th-century cases, commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose. See, e.g., Sheldon, in 5 Blume 346; Rawle 123; Pomeroy 152–153; Abbott333. For example, the majority of the 19th-century courts to consider the question held that prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons were lawful under the Second Amendment or state analogues. See, e.g., State v. Chandler, 5 La. Ann., at 489–490; Nunn v. State, 1 Ga., at 251; see generally 2 Kent *340, n. 2; The American Students’ Blackstone 84, n. 11 (G. Chase ed. 1884). Although we do not undertake an exhaustive historical analysis today of the full scope of the Second Amendment , nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.26

No court has the authority to change the Constitution of the United States.

We also recognize another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms. Miller said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those “in common use at the time.” 307 U. S., at 179. We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of “dangerous and unusual weapons.”

Miller does not have the authority to change the Constitution of the United States.

Ooops.

BTW, doofus, have you ever heard of seat belt laws/ Emission laws? Laws governing safety features of cars?

Yes. Various federal laws. They are unconstitutional.

My God, you are a fucking moron.

Inversion fallacy. You are describing yourself again.

 

[Into the Night]

It isn't my claim. It is taken directly from the Heller decision. From the Supreme Court of the United States of America. Remember them, dumb fuck?

The Supreme Court does not have authority to change the Constitution of the United States nor any State constitution. See Article III of the Constitution of the United States.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Biden wants to destroy the second amendment. Biden and democrats hate the constitution and how it limits government


https://www.theepochtimes.com/biden...utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=BonginoReport

So, what it boils down to is more of the same ineffective and useless 'gun laws' that are already on the books. By the way, I doubt any reasonable court would count someone selling a gun privately on occasion as "predominately earn a profit." On the other hand, someone that regularly sells at gun shows but isn't a licensed dealer would have to do the checks, something more reputable sellers already do.

 

[Into the Night]

In what way are you claiming that the Constitution allows for the right to keep and bear arms to be infringed?

Y O U * A R E * A * T O T A L *
The first words of the 2nd ' A well-regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state.' Not added on. Not a 2nd thought, but the start, the basis for why the 2nd was written. We had no standing army, nor the wealth to build one. America was very vulnerable to foreign invaders. War for land and resources was common. We had to fight with citizen soldiers. That is why they needed guns, training and regulation.
The 2nd is not very long. Perhaps, on a good day, you could read the whole thing.​

False conditional.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

First, rights do not come from the Constitution or any other piece of paper. That is not the purpose of a constitution.

The 2nd amendment discusses the inherent right of self defense, both for a free State (a State of the Union), and again for the individual (the people).
A free State has the right to defend itself by forming and organizing a militia (a well regulated militia).
An individual (the people) have the right to defend himself by keeping (owning) and bearing (carrying and using them) arms (ANY weapon, including ANY gun).

The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.

A person has the right to keep and bear arms for the defense of self, family, home and state, and for lawful hunting and recreational use.

A person has the right to keep and bear arms for the defense of self, family, home and state, for lawful hunting and recreational use, and for any other lawful purpose; but standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, and shall not be tolerated, and the military shall be in strict subordination to the civil power.

An individual has the right to keep and bear arms. That means OWN and CARRY and USE ANY weapon, not just any gun.


States MUST conform to the Constitution of the United States, including the 2nd amendment. They agreed to this when they joined the Union. Yes...that includes the 2nd Amendment.​

 

[Into the Night]

No, I posted the relevant text which answers your question. Heller is clear. Limits CAN.be placed on the 2nd. It is not absolute. So says SCOTUS.

SCOTUS has no authority to change the Constitution of the United States nor any State constitution.

 

[Into the Night]

ROTFLMFAO!!! What part of ‘not unlimited’ are you having problems with? Are the words too big? Do you need a picture book.

Where does the phrase 'not unlimited' occur in the Constitution of the United States???

 

[Into the Night]

why do you think this will make them stop. Will the next mass shooting make you realize you are wrong?........

Ole' Nordberg doesn't seem to realize that he's actually making a case for keeping and bearing arms every time he mentions a 'mass shooter'.
I keep telling him...shoot back.