Big Brother Gives Infraction For Believing Homosexuality Is Wrong

Whoever said he knew the truth. I didn't say that. I said he can't tell me anything that I don't already know. What are you?
It's clear he introduced AIDS as a "put down" of gays. He's of that Pat Robertson crowd, that believes that AIDS is God's retaliation against homosexuals, when clearly, straights make up the largest segment of the newly infected. So stupid to use a disease as a way to demean and devalue people. No Christian would ever do such a thing.

You didn't say that, huh ????

and your post says..."He's of that Pat Robertson crowd, that believes that AIDS is God's retaliation against homosexuals".... You know what....pinhead,

HE didn't say that, either...right ??? and maybe he ain't a Christian....
 
This is a symptom of the problem in our public indoctrination system. Queers who bully Christians has to be stopped immediately.

So your hatred is OK? What exactly are queers in your world? My brother is gay and a finer man than you will ever be.


"You want to know what really causes homosexuality?"

"This question, which arises from an assumption that one is homosexual because “something went wrong,” should be just as interesting as the question, “What causes heterosexuality?” Think about that question for a moment, and ask yourself why nobody ever asks it. In asking this question, are you looking to change someone? To heal someone? Yourself perhaps?"

"The two most common answers one hears today is that sexuality is either a choice, or it’s genetic. Have you considered it might be neither? Perhaps sexuality (homo, hetero and anything in-between) is ‘learned’ as subtely as one’s mother tongue, or perhaps it’s a psychological reaction. It could be a result of parental hormones during conception or pregnancy or breastfeeding. It could be a result of womb-temperature, the vitamin balance in the parents, or their age. It could be a complex combination of these factors. The only honest answer to this question at the moment is that nobody knows."

"Which of these ‘causes’ would justify discrimination?"
Which would make one sexuality inferior to another? Many people believe that if homosexuality were proven to be genetic, then those who discriminate against us would have no reason to discriminate. It’s a seductive argument, but I believe it has more to do with people trying to put their own minds at ease, as they struggle with (self-)acceptance."

"Those who believe a genetic cause would make discrimination unjustifiable, clearly imply that discrimination against homosexuals is justifiable in other circumstances. More importantly, this argument relies on a belief that reason can defeat discrimination, implying that discrimination is based on reason; that discrimination is reasonable."

"If skin-colour were a choice, would racism be justified?
Would it then be completely reasonable to say that only if you are a particular colour are you allowed to marry or join organisations or visit a loved-one in hospital? If skin-colour were a choice, would it be reasonable to say that some skin-colours were sinful or evil or immoral, and others not?"

"Skin-colour is genetic, but has this fact ever changed the opinion of even one of those who discriminate against other races?

Hate is not reasonable.

"Hate is not a reasoned argument. Don’t pander to those who hate by trying to prove you ‘couldn’t help it’, or ‘given the choice, you’d be heterosexual’. Beware of the ‘good little boy’ syndrome, where you over-achieve in the hope that people will be willing to ‘overlook’ your supposed imperfection. These things only justify the discrimination.

"The cause of sexuality is really quite irrelevant, except to those who are insecure and want you to conform. There’s no need to look for some cause, as your sexuality is not an imperfection. You’re just fine the way you are, with your own potential, possibilities and set of things you have to offer to the world.

"Be yourself, inasmuch at does not bring physical harm, and know you’re not alone. History is littered with proof of the fact that it is possible for the majority to be wrong.

"And quite frankly, the only ‘reasonable’ answer to unreasonable bigots is, well, none at all."

www.scottowen.org
 
Stupid. You are preaching to the choir. I'm an AIDS activist. There is nothing you can tell me about AIDS/HIV that I don't already know, from its' history to its' outlook.
Shall I tell you about being a retarded homophobic, bigoted tea partier? You already know, right?

LOL. Name calling and insults do not make an argument. Go re-write history somewhere else.
 
Whoever said he knew the truth. I didn't say that. I said he can't tell me anything that I don't already know. What are you?
It's clear he introduced AIDS as a "put down" of gays. He's of that Pat Robertson crowd, that believes that AIDS is God's retaliation against homosexuals, when clearly, straights make up the largest segment of the newly infected. So stupid to use a disease as a way to demean and devalue people. No Christian would ever do such a thing.

I said AIDS was first found in homosexual men and that is the truth. You haven't denied it. All you can do is insult and call names. Nothing in my statement is demeaning. YOU are taking offense at the truth. Grow up.
 
So your hatred is OK? What exactly are queers in your world? My brother is gay and a finer man than you will ever be.


"You want to know what really causes homosexuality?"

"This question, which arises from an assumption that one is homosexual because “something went wrong,” should be just as interesting as the question, “What causes heterosexuality?” Think about that question for a moment, and ask yourself why nobody ever asks it. In asking this question, are you looking to change someone? To heal someone? Yourself perhaps?"

"The two most common answers one hears today is that sexuality is either a choice, or it’s genetic. Have you considered it might be neither? Perhaps sexuality (homo, hetero and anything in-between) is ‘learned’ as subtely as one’s mother tongue, or perhaps it’s a psychological reaction. It could be a result of parental hormones during conception or pregnancy or breastfeeding. It could be a result of womb-temperature, the vitamin balance in the parents, or their age. It could be a complex combination of these factors. The only honest answer to this question at the moment is that nobody knows."

"Which of these ‘causes’ would justify discrimination?"
Which would make one sexuality inferior to another? Many people believe that if homosexuality were proven to be genetic, then those who discriminate against us would have no reason to discriminate. It’s a seductive argument, but I believe it has more to do with people trying to put their own minds at ease, as they struggle with (self-)acceptance."

"Those who believe a genetic cause would make discrimination unjustifiable, clearly imply that discrimination against homosexuals is justifiable in other circumstances. More importantly, this argument relies on a belief that reason can defeat discrimination, implying that discrimination is based on reason; that discrimination is reasonable."

"If skin-colour were a choice, would racism be justified?
Would it then be completely reasonable to say that only if you are a particular colour are you allowed to marry or join organisations or visit a loved-one in hospital? If skin-colour were a choice, would it be reasonable to say that some skin-colours were sinful or evil or immoral, and others not?"

"Skin-colour is genetic, but has this fact ever changed the opinion of even one of those who discriminate against other races?

Hate is not reasonable.

"Hate is not a reasoned argument. Don’t pander to those who hate by trying to prove you ‘couldn’t help it’, or ‘given the choice, you’d be heterosexual’. Beware of the ‘good little boy’ syndrome, where you over-achieve in the hope that people will be willing to ‘overlook’ your supposed imperfection. These things only justify the discrimination.

"The cause of sexuality is really quite irrelevant, except to those who are insecure and want you to conform. There’s no need to look for some cause, as your sexuality is not an imperfection. You’re just fine the way you are, with your own potential, possibilities and set of things you have to offer to the world.

"Be yourself, inasmuch at does not bring physical harm, and know you’re not alone. History is littered with proof of the fact that it is possible for the majority to be wrong.

"And quite frankly, the only ‘reasonable’ answer to unreasonable bigots is, well, none at all."

www.scottowen.org


Hey dummy, i'ts still a sin and unexceptable behavior. Your brother shouldn't be allowed atound the children unless he is supervised by a straight adult.
 
LOL. Name calling and insults do not make an argument. Go re-write history somewhere else.

Telling lies, with no documentation to back up your idiotic claims doesn't make a case. I don't re-write history. I deal in facts and logic. Foreign substances to you.
 
I said AIDS was first found in homosexual men and that is the truth. You haven't denied it. All you can do is insult and call names. Nothing in my statement is demeaning. YOU are taking offense at the truth. Grow up.
.


It was first detected in Africans, who had been infected with tainted polio vaccine, by French healthcare workers. Gaetan Dugas, Patient Zero, was a bisexual airline steward, who had sex with infected African males, and brought the virus to the West ( his native Canada) and he infected others via sexual contact.
I insult and call you names because I can, justifiably so. You're scum of the Earth. And what you're doing is trying to paint gays in a more negative light.
You're entitled to your opinion....not your own facts. You wouldn't know the truth, if it slapped you upside of your racist bigoted head. But I'm willing to oblige and give it an "all-American" try. Ask your mama to grow up.
 
If we didn't have queer poets running around on the streets we would have less cases of aids.

Your ignorance is startling. Sexual orientation or lack of normal brain function has nothing to do with immunity. That last whore that you slept with....if you didn't use a condom, you could presently be infected.
 
Hey dummy, i'ts still a sin and unexceptable behavior. Your brother shouldn't be allowed atound the children unless he is supervised by a straight adult.

Shouldn't have dropped out of grade school. You might be able to spell. You sin, daily. Like everyone else. And you're stupid, to boot.
 
.


It was first detected in Africans, who had been infected with tainted polio vaccine, by French healthcare workers. Gaetan Dugas, Patient Zero, was a bisexual airline steward, who had sex with infected African males, and brought the virus to the West ( his native Canada) and he infected others via sexual contact.
I insult and call you names because I can, justifiably so. You're scum of the Earth. And what you're doing is trying to paint gays in a more negative light.
You're entitled to your opinion....not your own facts. You wouldn't know the truth, if it slapped you upside of your racist bigoted head. But I'm willing to oblige and give it an "all-American" try. Ask your mama to grow up.

Quoting O'Donnell is not going to make your case. You're the wolf in sheep's clothing that Jesus warned us about.

Give me a link verifying that information.
 
So your hatred is OK?

Thats exactly whats wrong with pinheads.....everything to you guys is 'hate'.....

There are men that treat their wives badly, wives that cheat on the husbands, people that eat fuckin' bugs and monkey brains, etc....I don't hate any of them.
I do find the things they do disgusting....and thats what it is with homos.....

I don't give a shit how many dicks they have in their anus or in their months, or what they do in their bedrooms at night..... I just find the practice repugnant...
I interact with them every day in the normal course of living....some I know personally....I don't have to go to dinner with them or invite them into my home just because they are homos....I do have to treat them in a civil manner and respect them as persons as I do and would anyone I meet.....
So get a simple thing clear in your brainwashed skull....I don't hate them....I don't love them....I tolerate them as I tolerate everyone ......

I don't want to see their parades and watch them simulate anal sex on floats, I don't want them in schools pushing their political or personal agendas....and I don't want to change the definitions of words to satisfy their demands....

and just to make myself clear...

I don't want to see hetro parades and watch couples simulate sex acts, I don't want hetros in schools pushing their agendas, and I don't want to change the definitions of words to satisfy their demands either.....

Got it?
 
That's the way it is in the new age, secular progressive mind. If you don't go along, then you're evil and a hater, a bigot, a racist, a homophobe, etc, etc.. If you oppose their agenda then you are deserving of their name calling and insults. The name calling is to shut you up. No one likes being called a racist or a homophobe. They abhor individual freedom and individual thought because that is something they can't control, so the only way they can attempt to silence those who encourage individuality is to insult and silence them. You can see it here and on other forums every day, all day. This is who and what they are.
 
That's the way it is in the new age, secular progressive mind. If you don't go along, then you're evil and a hater, a bigot, a racist, a homophobe, etc, etc.. If you oppose their agenda then you are deserving of their name calling and insults. The name calling is to shut you up. No one likes being called a racist or a homophobe. The left is nasty and evil. You can see it here and on other forums every day, all day. This is who and what they are.

Don't act or think that way, and you won't be called it. Simple.

And you just described conservatism. It's who and what you are.
 
Thats exactly whats wrong with pinheads.....everything to you guys is 'hate'.....

There are men that treat their wives badly, wives that cheat on the husbands, people that eat fuckin' bugs and monkey brains, etc....I don't hate any of them.
I do find the things they do disgusting....and thats what it is with homos.....

I don't give a shit how many dicks they have in their anus or in their months, or what they do in their bedrooms at night..... I just find the practice repugnant...
I interact with them every day in the normal course of living....some I know personally....I don't have to go to dinner with them or invite them into my home just because they are homos....I do have to treat them in a civil manner and respect them as persons as I do and would anyone I meet.....
So get a simple thing clear in your brainwashed skull....I don't hate them....I don't love them....I tolerate them as I tolerate everyone ......

I don't want to see their parades and watch them simulate anal sex on floats, I don't want them in schools pushing their political or personal agendas....and I don't want to change the definitions of words to satisfy their demands....

and just to make myself clear...

I don't want to see hetro parades and watch couples simulate sex acts, I don't want hetros in schools pushing their agendas, and I don't want to change the definitions of words to satisfy their demands either.....

Got it?

There's a lot of shit I don't like...but since this is America....I have to deal with it. So do you. Get over it.
 
I don't want to see their parades and watch them simulate anal sex on floats, I don't want them in schools pushing their political or personal agendas....and I don't want to change the definitions of words to satisfy their demands....

and just to make myself clear...

I don't want to see hetro parades and watch couples simulate sex acts, I don't want hetros in schools pushing their agendas, and I don't want to change the definitions of words to satisfy their demands either.....

Got it?[/B][/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE]

I hate to say this, but I agree with these two paragraphs. I would start by saying that I do not wish to see heterosexual couples flaunting their sexuality in public neither do I wish to see tight satin shorts on grown men. It is the parade and the exhibitionism I find offensive not the sexuality.
Perhaps it comes with the territory of just getting on a bit!
I have only seen these things on TV, I think we are rather too small to have enough of either persuasion prepared to flaunt themselves in public. We do have 'silly goings on' but they are almost exclusively connected to one charity or other.
I did once have a dream that on the eve of the handover of HK to China in 97 I would ride in the back of an open top Rolls down the main street of Kowloon, pounding one of the local whores. Symbolic really. But good sense eventually prevailed and we all toddled off to a ball instead.
 
Why do you paint us all with the same brush?

It was a paraphrase of an American script writer and makes the point of 'many', not 'all'.

But watch your people on TV. You know, the 'ordinary folk'. Watch their body language, listen to their intonation, tell me that Mrs. Kapulsky does not model herself on Opera Windbag. Tell me that Cindy-Lou Ordinary is not treating a street interview as if it was an audition to take over from Letterman.
 
Back
Top