icedancer2theend
Verified User
Get a grip Tommy....we are not Bonobo monkeys, or goats, or sheep......
Now you've done it...you have outed Tom's 3 favorite play things~
Get a grip Tommy....we are not Bonobo monkeys, or goats, or sheep......
Oral sex isn't sexual intercourse. Anal sex isn't sexual intercourse either. The anus isn't a sex organ. The only sexual intercourse that can happen is between a man and a woman.
So you are agreeing with Bill Clinton when he said "I did not have sex with that woman".
Presumably that means oral sex is deviant behaviour.
Well, according to you, any time humans engage in sexual activity that is not specifically & only for the purpose of producing offspring, it isn't "normal."
And I hate to break it to you, but homosexuals are "born that way." It isn't an "excuse"...unless you can remember the exact time & place where you made the "decision" to be attracted to the opposite sex.
Your diatribe was fairly revealing as to explaining why you feel the way you do about this incident. It wasn't pretty, btw.
Consider that ANY form of sexual behavior between male and female is NORMAL and should in the standard course of events, lead to reproduction......in mixed company, we refer to this behavior as 'foreplay'.....and that it might take the form of any and all events leading to actual intercourse....
Homosexual sex can never lead to reproduction...its un-natural in that sense....it is conduct solely for the purpose of gratification......it is an urge that can be surrendered to or controlled......
Before the age of "if it feels good, do it", this was accepted common sense....and its as true today as it was a hundred years ago....
Calling drug addiction, alcohol addiction, homosexual behavior, gambling, etc., a disease, doesn't make it a one...
not any more than speeding, bullying, stealing, etc...can be called a disease.....these are behaviors and urges that can be controlled and in extreme cases might be labeled mental disorders.....(as they were before the PC bullshit become the fad)..... when the urges become uncontrollable
Pedophilia
Kleptomania
Psychopath
Sociopath
etc.
.
So what about oral sex where the woman swallows?
So what about oral sex where the woman swallows?
Consider that ANY form of sexual behavior between male and female is NORMAL and should in the standard course of events, lead to reproduction......in mixed company, we refer to this behavior as 'foreplay'.....and that it might take the form of any and all events leading to actual intercourse....
Homosexual sex can never lead to reproduction...its un-natural in that sense....it is conduct solely for the purpose of gratification......it is an urge that can be surrendered to or controlled......
Before the age of "if it feels good, do it", this was accepted common sense....and its as true today as it was a hundred years ago....
Calling drug addiction, alcohol addiction, homosexual behavior, gambling, etc., a disease, doesn't make it a one...
not any more than speeding, bullying, stealing, etc...can be called a disease.....these are behaviors and urges that can be controlled and in extreme cases might be labeled mental disorders.....(as they were before the PC bullshit become the fad)..... when the urges become uncontrollable
Pedophilia
Kleptomania
Psychopath
Sociopath
etc.
.
That's such lame spin. There are literally billions of sexual encounters between men & women that not only do NOT lead to offspring, but are never INTENDED to lead to offspring.
Homosexuality isn't a "disease."
That's such lame spin. There are literally billions of sexual encounters between men & women that not only do NOT lead to offspring, but are never INTENDED to lead to offspring.
Homosexuality isn't a "disease."
Try again. Only, this time get a reading teacher to show you the intricacies of reading for comprehension. What I said was that sexual behavior which overrides the primary purpose of reproduction is, by scientific definition, abnormal behavior. Sexual behavior is the direct result of the biological necessity of reproduction. That is simple science. Humans (and apparently monkeys) have an added social aspect to sexual behavior. But just because a species uses a variety of sexual behaviors to enhance interpersonal relationships does not mean the PRIMARY purpose has been supplanted. The primary purpose remains reproduction. But when the social behavior is the ONLY sexual behavior, then the behavior is abnormal because the behavior DOES supplant the biological imperative of reproduction. Same can be said for the monkey study - there is zero evidence presented that indicates the social aspect of the presented sexual behaviors has supplanted reproduction.Well, according to you, any time humans engage in sexual activity that is not specifically & only for the purpose of producing offspring, it isn't "normal."
And again you need a remedial course in reading comprehension. I never said they were NOT born that way. What I said was being "born that way" is not a valid excuse for ACTING on it, unless you want to excuse every other behavior of humans under the same umbrella. As a species we are violent - we are BORN THAT WAY. Does that excuse violent behaviors against others? As a species were are BORN fundamentally polygamous. Should we get rid of all the laws and codes that punish infidelity? The POINT is that while the state of being homosexual - being sexually attracted to the same gender, is an inherited trait. (a claim not fully supported by scientific evidence, but we'll grant the "born that way" claim for now so as not to cloud the issue). BUT, to ENGAGE in homosexual behavior is an ACTION. We are not "born" to take actions - we have intellect which allows us to CHOOSE to not engage in particular behaviors, and, indeed, society EXPECTS us to choose to NOT blindly follow our base "born than way" instincts.And I hate to break it to you, but homosexuals are "born that way." It isn't an "excuse"...unless you can remember the exact time & place where you made the "decision" to be attracted to the opposite sex.
When some mindless twit starts defending tyranny, I will call them on it. Period. If you don't find that "pretty", too fucking bad. YOU, personally, are defending an act of tyranny. And if the situation were reversed, and a teacher in a church funded school were to subject a student to discipline for stating the opinion that their religion is wrong in repressing homosexuality, I would call them tyrants also, as well as anyone who defended their tyranny.Your diatribe was fairly revealing as to explaining why you feel the way you do about this incident. It wasn't pretty, btw.
Google "And the Band Played On", and Gaetan Dugas. Rolling Stone wrote an expose' on how Africans were infected with tainted polio virus from monkeys, and the AIDS/HIV virus was introduced into humans, and spread not only by sexual contact, but by blood and bodily secretions. Quit spreading disinformation.
"The first recognised cases of AIDS occurred in the USA in the early 1980s (more about this period can be found on our History of AIDS page). A number of gay men in New York and California suddenly began to develop rare opportunistic infections and cancers that seemed stubbornly resistant to any treatment. At this time, AIDS did not yet have a name, but it quickly became obvious that all the men were suffering from a common syndrome."
http://www.avert.org/origin-aids-hiv.htm
Stupid. You are preaching to the choir. I'm an AIDS activist. There is nothing you can tell me about AIDS/HIV that I don't already know, from its' history to its' outlook.
Shall I tell you about being a retarded homophobic, bigoted tea partier? You already know, right?
Thats called love.
Metaphorically....I guess that would be classified as seed that fell on stony ground.
Wow...an 'AIDS activist' , huh.....wow .......Alias was wasting his time....you already knew everything he said was true......
If only he'd have known you were an........AAaaaiiiiddddds Aaativvvvvisssstisssts.......he could have save his strength.....