Big Brother Gives Infraction For Believing Homosexuality Is Wrong
- Thread starter Alias
- Start date
Alias
Banned
Christ didn't have to say homosexuality was wrong. Everyone knew it was wrong because the scriptures said it was. Jesus did say marriage was between a man and a woman.
Being a sexual pervert has nothing to do with discrimination or harassment and it also has nothing to do with race or civil rights. You're repeating what you've been indoctrinated to believe. That's understandable, but you don't know why you believe it, just that you've been told that homosexuality is normal behavior. Calling people bigots for different beliefs than yours is also bigoted. No one is denying homosexuals their civil rights. There is no bigotry for believing that homosexuality is wrong. That is a personal belief and in this country people are free to believe what their religion teaches. Was Jesus bigoted?
This teacher crossed the line and he was reprimanded. He's damn lucky the kid's father didn't get in his face. I would have if he treated my kid like that. Someday this teacher might piss off the wrong kid and learn his lesson the heard way.
Last edited:
An my response to you on that subject is you criticizing ME for minor spelling typos and grammar typos....thats called hypocricy....oh..make that hypocrisy...remember that one ?
That stupid pill you're taking is kicking in...cut back a few mg.
And when did you last talk to Christ about your homosexuality...exactly what did he tell you anyway ?
And when its all said and done, why should everyone or anyone care what Christ said 2000 years ago....
Good Luck
New member
Jesus' teachings are not the sole content of the Bible. My guess is that, unlike other issues, homosexuality was probably repressed enough it never came up as a topic to teach on. Besides, Jesus was about asking for and receiving forgiveness - how we react to sin, not a change it what is considered sinful. We forgive the sin (if it is repented) and love the sinner. At no time did He try to redefine what was sinful, nor did He say we are to simply accept sin as "normal". Quite the opposite, in fact:
Matt 5:17-19
Seems to be a pretty strong support of the Mosaic laws, which include the prohibition against homosexuality.
And the continual use of the label "bigot" is not used emotionally? LOL Your hypocrisy is showing again.
Sorry, but your analogies and parallels do not work. Being black is not an ACT. Engaging in homosexual sex is an act. Having a stutter is a medical condition, which most people use all kinds of medical and psycho-physical treatments to overcome. (Are you saying homosexuality is a medical condition that needs to be overcome? ... I didn't think so.)
Engaging in homosexuality is an ACT. We can, and do CHOOSE to act, or choose NOT to act. And while some will claim "they were born that way" or other excuses, it still does not change the fact that engaging in homosexuality is a choice of action. They may not have control over which gender they find attractive, but they DO have the ability to control how they react to it. Calling homosexuality wrong is no more bigotry than is calling sexual or marital infidelity "bigotry". Mankind is, biologically, polygamous. Yet we have no reservation in expecting men and women to remain monogamous in a relationship, and even have laws (mostly based on Biblical teachings) which civilly (at one time criminally) punishes those who choose to engage in infidelity. Yet, people who "stray", as it is sometimes called, are simply doing what they were born to do, if we listen to those who excuse homosexual behavior under the "born that way" excuse.
Mankind has all KINDS of instincts and behaviors left over from when we were little more than tree-swinging savages. Society, in general, finds nothing wrong with expecting people to NOT engage in basic, animalistic behavior. Sexuality has its morés. Rape is a crime punishable by prison terms to protect society from those who do not wish to control their aggression and need to control. Infidelity is also punished, and even today when commercials showing women in breast and buttock enhancing underwear is normal prime-time television, an excess of promiscuity is still frowned upon. The same holds true for pretty much every other aspect of social behavior: we are expected to control our basic animal urges in order to exist peacefully in society.
If you do not believe that homosexual behavior is wrong, that is YOUR belief. (as in your political philosophy and those who share it, not you personally. Same for the other uses of "you" in this dialogue.) Others do NOT share your belief - by quite a large majority world wide, and even a large plurality if not majority in the U.S. And, of course, it would bee totally PIC to mention that scientifically homosexuality is, by definition, abnormal, since NORMAL sexual behavior is for the purpose of reproduction. (why is it you liberals always decry that conservatives ignore science, yet invariably ignore or deny science when it does not support your delusions of reality? Another little piece of hypocrisy practiced on a regular basis while hanging the tag on others for daring to not believe as you do.)
Your expectation that people should put aside their religious beliefs, or at best STFU about them; that religious people should and can be forced to "be careful where and when they talk" - and then claim to be justified in using governmental authority to punish those who do not conform to your beliefs, is nothing short of egocentrism coupled with the modern progressive tendency toward tyranny.
You fucking well should be.
Last edited:
Good Luck
New member
If you have to even ask, it simply shows you to be more willfully ignorant than usual. How many species, including ours, would survive long if the primary purpose of sexual behavior was NOT for reproduction? Humans have, admittedly, added a strong social aspect to sexual behavior, but that does not change the primary purpose. When secondary purposes override primary purposes, that is not normal behavior.
Like I said - you always deny science when scientific facts do are inconvenient.
Lowaicue
英語在香港
To say the primary purpose is reproduction is correct but should not be taken as meaning the only important purpose. Not all animals are ignorant of other purposes of sexual behaviour. The Bonobo, for example, uses sex as a means of negotiation and control. Intelligence agents use sex to prevent world wars (sometimes), human beings and some other species use it for sharing intense pleasure. While life would not continue without it, the life we had would be pretty miserable.
Really, what I am saying is that, once again, there is no black and white to most arguments and certainly with the generally brain dead members of the extreme right that point is lost. The result of that is a polarisation of American politics which is crippling the country and having a negative effect on the rest of the world.
Whilst this thread is about attitudes to homosexuality it reflects the total, ignorant intransigence of some people.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
I suggest that you study Bonobo monkeys and their behaviour.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5c0_1246592465
Mr. T
Verified User
Less than 2% fag, stop dreaming
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Presumably that means oral sex is deviant behaviour.
Lowaicue
英語在香港
Only if you are eating fish n chips at the same time!
Well, according to you, any time humans engage in sexual activity that is not specifically & only for the purpose of producing offspring, it isn't "normal."
And I hate to break it to you, but homosexuals are "born that way." It isn't an "excuse"...unless you can remember the exact time & place where you made the "decision" to be attracted to the opposite sex.
Your diatribe was fairly revealing as to explaining why you feel the way you do about this incident. It wasn't pretty, btw.
poet
Banned
Well, we have an overflow of deviants on board.
Bravo, feel free to point out my spelling and grammar errors as they occur.
And you feel free to continue to be a hypocrite...
Get a grip Tommy....we are not Bonobo monkeys, or goats, or sheep......
Alias
Banned
Oral sex isn't sexual intercourse. Anal sex isn't sexual intercourse either. The anus isn't a sex organ. The only sexual intercourse that can happen is between a man and a woman.