Birth Right Citizenship Will It Finally End?

Oh boy, I'm not sure your point. I agree, in order to amend the constitution it can only be done by 2/3 congress and 3/4 of the states. I'm with you......
Congress is not required to amend the Constitution. They can propose an amendment, but that's all. The States can simply act on their own. They are, after all, the creators of that Constitution. It is the States that own that document and ordained it to the power that it has.
 
He did not basic 6th grade civics.

not relevant to this issue?
I saw your denial of its very existence before you edited your answer, slimeball.

Explain why it is not relevant in the context of 14A citizenship ... so the rest of can understand you.
 
Congress is not required to amend the Constitution. They can propose an amendment, but that's all.
No word police today....(I'm in a great mood, I am returning to work next week. sweeeet) Please tell me you realized that my sentence was poorly phrased and you were merely pointing that out.

However, a 2/3 majority of congress is required to amend the constitution..... AND.... 3/4 of the states must ratify the amendment.

This is a test to see if you can handle my poor phrasing without correcting me, just for fun... :nodyes: ....I know you're tempted.
 
I saw your denial of its very existence before you edited your answer, slimeball.

Explain why it is not relevant in the context of 14A citizenship ... so the rest of can understand you.
What is wrong with editing when you realize your answer was not precise?

Because the writers did not say “citizenship jurisdiction”, they wrote “jurisdiction.”

Additionally the context is clear.

For more than a century the courts and congress have interpreted it based in the clear meaning.

The writers discussed the nature of American Citizenship not being genetically or culturally based, but based on the “melting pot” spirit of America.
 
What is wrong with editing when you realize your answer was not precise?

Because the writers did not say “citizenship jurisdiction”, they wrote “jurisdiction.”

Additionally the context is clear.

For more than a century the courts and congress have interpreted it based in the clear meaning.

The writers discussed the nature of American Citizenship not being genetically or culturally based, but based on the “melting pot” spirit of America.
So you have no answer.

What jurisdiction does the 14A citizenship act refer to?
 
So you have no answer.

What jurisdiction does the 14A citizenship act refer to?
Jurisdiction.

Not special jurisdiction
Not ancillary jurisdiction
Not pendant jurisdiction

Just the plain meaning of jurisdiction.

Otherwise, the framers would have said so.

What kind of firearms do you think they meant in the second amendment? Maybe they only intended the second amendment to limit musket fire?

The felon, and the right wing media, are promoting very dumb arguments, and for some reason you people are falling for it.
 
Last edited:
Jurisdiction.

Not special jurisdiction
Not ancillary jurisdiction
Not pendant jurisdiction

Just the plain meaning of jurisdiction.

Otherwise, the framers would have said so.

What kind of firearms do you think they meant in the second amendment? Maybe they only intended the second amendment to limit musket fire?
You mean like ... you're basically under the jurisdiction of your parents until you turn 18 years old?
 
Jurisdiction.

Not special jurisdiction
Not ancillary jurisdiction
Not pendant jurisdiction

Just the plain meaning of jurisdiction.

Otherwise, the framers would have said so.
Obviously, you don't even know what being subject to a jurisdiction even means.
What kind of firearms do you think they meant in the second amendment?
Any.
Maybe they only intended the second amendment to limit musket fire?
No. ANY WEAPON.
The felon, and the right wing media, are promoting very dumb arguments, and for some reason you people are falling for it.
No, Pretender. You just want to ignore the Constitution of the United States. Word games won't work.
 
What is wrong with editing when you realize your answer was not precise?

Because the writers did not say “citizenship jurisdiction”, they wrote “jurisdiction.”

Additionally the context is clear.

For more than a century the courts and congress have interpreted it based in the clear meaning.

The writers discussed the nature of American Citizenship not being genetically or culturally based, but based on the “melting pot” spirit of America.
Your word games won't work, Pretender. Go learn what a subject of a jurisdiction is.
 
You mean like ... you're basically under the jurisdiction of your parents until you turn 18 years old?
Yes very much like that, we are all under the jurisdiction of the United States when we are in the United States. Except some diplomats.

Parents may set a curfew, the federal government set the law, taxes, trade practices.

If the federal government can regulate you, you are under their jurisdiction.

Much like a semiautomatic rifle and a musket are firearms.
 
Last edited:
Yes very much like that, we are all under the jurisdiction of the United States when we are in the United States. Except some diplomats.
Illegal aliens are not subjects of jurisdiction of the United States, Pretender. Neither are their offspring. They broke the law coming here. They are subject to deportation and their offspring with them.
Parents may set a curfew, the federal government set the law, taxes, trade practices.

If the federal government can regulate you, you are under their jurisdiction.
Go learn what a subject of jurisdiction is, Pretender.
Much like a semiautomatic rifle and a musket are firearms.
Random phrase. No apparent coherency.
 
Yes very much like that, we are all under the jurisdiction of the United States when we are in the United States. Except some diplomats.

Parents may set a curfew, the federal government set the law, taxes, trade practices.

If the federal government can regulate you, you are under their jurisdiction.

Much like a semiautomatic rifle and a musket are firearms.

Diplomatic immunity exclusion is a separate stand alone law.

So why is "and subject to" included in 14A citizenship? Is it redundant, superfluous, unnecessary and meaningless?

"Section 1.All persons born ... in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, "
 
You galactically stupid fucktard. You have never taken a constitutional law class in your entire life. I can tell.

I'm not going to waste my time explaining the context of the 14th Amendment to you because you won't be able to understand it, but just consider that the amendment was ratified in 1868.

Do tell us what you plan to do with children who were born in the US of parents who were undocumented immigrants.
From the E.O. ...

(b) Subsection (a) of this section shall apply only to persons who are born within the United States after 30 days from the date of this order.

 
Back
Top