Black Female Obesity is NOT the Fault of the Black Female!!! ... apparently...

evince said:
no killing any animals

First you have to go find a dead mule


then you bite its cock


Pretend its an order from Putin
Click to expand...
Shameful...but, where do you go to find these "dead mules" you speak of? I thought you were an animal advocate... Yet you want others to look for and abuse the corpse of a poor expired animal? One has to wonder....
 
Celticguy said:
I went to an upscale soul food place once. They wanted to put gravy on fried catfish. The catfish was good if unimaginative on the seasoning but gravy ?
Might as well put a tub of salted lard on the table or inject it straight into the arteries.
Click to expand...

Glad you got my point.
 
gfm7175 said:
Black Female Obesity is NOT the Fault of the Black Female!!! ... apparently...

... it's, you guessed it, TRUMP'S fault...
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
CFM said:
Glad you got my point.
Click to expand...

Point is their chosen cuisine is rooted in days gone by when you worked sunup to sunset and required the calories. But like many county folks they didnt adjust diet when machinery started doing the work.
 
Celticguy said:
Point is their chosen cuisine is rooted in days gone by when you worked sunup to sunset and required the calories. But like many county folks they didnt adjust diet when machinery started doing the work.
Click to expand...

The difference being that there are good calories and bad calories. Calories can come from a lot of things. If you ate pure sugar for you caloric intake and you expended the same amount in activity, you wouldn't gain weight but your body functions would suffer. However, eating the same amount of calories in food that provide basic nutrients will produce better overall bodily results. For example, a handful of almonds and a handful of gummy bears provides roughly the same amount of calories. Which one is going to be the better of the two for overall health.
 
CFM said:
The difference being that there are good calories and bad calories. Calories can come from a lot of things. If you ate pure sugar for you caloric intake and you expended the same amount in activity, you wouldn't gain weight but your body functions would suffer. However, eating the same amount of calories in food that provide basic nutrients will produce better overall bodily results. For example, a handful of almonds and a handful of gummy bears provides roughly the same amount of calories. Which one is going to be the better of the two for overall health.
Click to expand...

All of which was unknown in rural 1700's America were theu raised pigs while the Irish were happy just to have potatos and Scotland where they were happy to find anything to eat at all.
 
CFM said:
The difference being that there are good calories and bad calories. Calories can come from a lot of things. If you ate pure sugar for you caloric intake and you expended the same amount in activity, you wouldn't gain weight but your body functions would suffer. However, eating the same amount of calories in food that provide basic nutrients will produce better overall bodily results.
Click to expand...
Yup. Our high carb high sugar diets are quite literally poisoning us. We are growing insulin resistant due to these types of diets, and then we wonder why so many people have diabetes and various other issues with their heart/kidneys/etc...

We also ingest too much food too often. We have no need to constantly shove food down our face... We are naturally able to fast for extended periods. Note that fasting does not mean starving. We can easily work for a while, eat a small lunch, work for a while, eat supper, sleep, work for a while, eat a small lunch, etc... We can also easily work all day, have our satiating feast, sleep, work all day, have our satiating feast, sleep, etc... I've found intermittent fasting to be quite natural, rather than: eat breakfast, eat a pre-lunch snack, eat lunch, eat a post-lunch snack, eat a pre-supper snack, eat supper, eat a post-supper snack, then sleep before doing that all over again... Like holy shit, stop shoving food down your face for one second and actually accomplish something... Your poor digestive system is literally working 24/7 and you're on the toilet multiple times each day because you're eating way too damn much food.

CFM said:
For example, a handful of almonds and a handful of gummy bears provides roughly the same amount of calories. Which one is going to be the better of the two for overall health.
Click to expand...
Obviously the almonds. Almonds are higher in fat, have some protein, and are lower in carbs and sugars. Quite healthy for oneself. Gummy bears, on the other hand, have zero fat, less protein, and are very high in carbs and sugars. Quite unhealthy for oneself.
 
gfm7175 said:
Yup. Our high carb high sugar diets are quite literally poisoning us. We are growing insulin resistant due to these types of diets, and then we wonder why so many people have diabetes and various other issues with their heart/kidneys/etc...

We also ingest too much food too often. We have no need to constantly shove food down our face... We are naturally able to fast for extended periods. Note that fasting does not mean starving. We can easily work for a while, eat a small lunch, work for a while, eat supper, sleep, work for a while, eat a small lunch, etc... We can also easily work all day, have our satiating feast, sleep, work all day, have our satiating feast, sleep, etc... I've found intermittent fasting to be quite natural, rather than: eat breakfast, eat a pre-lunch snack, eat lunch, eat a post-lunch snack, eat a pre-supper snack, eat supper, eat a post-supper snack, then sleep before doing that all over again... Like holy shit, stop shoving food down your face for one second and actually accomplish something... Your poor digestive system is literally working 24/7 and you're on the toilet multiple times each day because you're eating way too damn much food.


Obviously the almonds. Almonds are higher in fat, have some protein, and are lower in carbs and sugars. Quite healthy for oneself. Gummy bears, on the other hand, have zero fat, less protein, and are very high in carbs and sugars. Quite unhealthy for oneself.
Click to expand...

Dieting make no sense. To be healthy involves a lifestyle choice.

As far as the almonds vs. gummy bears, that was the point. Both provide relatively the same amount of calories. One can provide nutrients the body needs while the other provides none.
 
CFM said:
Dieting make no sense. To be healthy involves a lifestyle choice.
Click to expand...
My comment was separating out two different ideas that people generally just lump together as "dieting". I separated out the notion of what one eats from the notion of when one eats (and how much one eats). When I speak of one's 'diet', I am speaking of what one is eating. Examples of this would be Keto, Carnivore, Vegan, etc... Those are all examples of people making conscious choices to eat particular foods.

When I speak of something such as 'intermittent fasting', I am not speaking at all about diet. I am instead speaking of the timing and frequency of one's eating. As someone who has personally been doing intermittent fasting for a month now, and has researched a little bit into the bodily processes relating to food intake, I've found that this aspect of eating is of equal importance to the aspect of choosing beneficial foods to begin with.

CFM said:
As far as the almonds vs. gummy bears, that was the point. Both provide relatively the same amount of calories. One can provide nutrients the body needs while the other provides none.
Click to expand...
Yup.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top