Black people are getting smarter!

Irish said:
You realize OJ basically confessed to the murders by writing a book "If I did it." Which was going to highlight how he did it and got away with it.

We also never saw what was in the bag robert kardashian hid.
Click to expand...

You realize that after I shot down another long disproved talking point, you just jumped to the next speculative one(s)....I suspect you don't have the intellectual courage to concede a point.
 
cawacko said:
It wasn't an attacking question. It was a hell of a show on all the (police) events in LA prior to the murders and things during and after. They interviewed several jurors who made it quite clear their reasoning for voting the way they did.

I love OJ. He is an amazing Trojan. I have his autographed jersey at home which I paid $250 for when he was in jail. That money went to pay his attorney's so I contributed to his defense.

His shoe prints and blood were all over the crime scene, in his car and in his home as were Goldman's and Nicole's. The LAPD planted that shit which is why he looks so guilty. But claiming there was no evidence of him at the scene???
Click to expand...

He showed up AFTER the crime was committed...none of his blood was there. And as I said, Furman had a history of evidence tampering and was directly contradicted by other officers at the scene.
 
aloysious said:
I forgot nothing to that effect. The prosecution never brought that out much less make a big deal out of it. It was brought out at the wrongful death trial.
Anyway I couldn't care less.
Click to expand...

Stop lying...you state untruths and when proven wrong you claim aloofness?

The wrongful death trial had a MUCH lower burden of proof thresh hold....I strongly urge you to go back and see the transcripts of the original trial because the shoes were INDEED INTRODUCED BY THE PROSECUTION AND HIGHLIGHTED. Deal with it, or do I need to shame you by producing the valid documentation?
 
Taichiliberal said:
He showed up AFTER the crime was committed...none of his blood was there. And as I said, Furman had a history of evidence tampering and was directly contradicted by other officers at the scene.
Click to expand...

Wait what? He showed up after the crime was committed? At the murder scene? OJ?
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:
Stop lying...you state untruths and when proven wrong you claim aloofness?

The wrongful death trial had a MUCH lower burden of proof thresh hold....I strongly urge you to go back and see the transcripts of the original trial because the shoes were INDEED INTRODUCED BY THE PROSECUTION AND HIGHLIGHTED. Deal with it, or do I need to shame you by producing the valid documentation?
Click to expand...
Could be but it was after the criminal trial that someone came forward with a foto of OJ wearing those shoes at a Bills game honoring him at halftime, I think. OJ denied ever owning those "ugly ass" shoes.
You're in the same category as truthers, birthers and flat earth society members.
 
cawacko said:
Wait what? He showed up after the crime was committed? At the murder scene? OJ?
Click to expand...

He happened to show up after the murders to accidently spread his DNA, then accidently wiped it on his bronco. Then had his driver run from the police while he had a gun to his head, and was going to commit suicide. Sounds like things an innocent man would do.
 
aloysious said:
Could be but it was after the criminal trial that someone came forward with a foto of OJ wearing those shoes at a Bills game honoring him at halftime, I think. OJ denied ever owning those "ugly ass" shoes.
You're in the same category as truthers, birthers and flat earth society members.
Click to expand...


BFD, chuckles! The prosecution could NOT prove whether the foot prints were there during or after the crime. Then there's this:

Stop nit picking and deal with the whole truth, chuckles. The prosecution couldn't make their case. Period.
 
Threedee said:
BFD, chuckles! The prosecution could NOT prove whether the foot prints were there during or after the crime. Then there's this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooueOtKAhUY

Stop nit picking and deal with the whole truth, chuckles. The prosecution couldn't make their case. Period.
Click to expand...


HIV = AIDS
Click to expand...

Much like this 3D dim bulb, who to date cannot produce the scientific medical paper that proves his crawl...such mindless parrots make it so much easier for criminal exploitation of society.
 
Irish said:
He happened to show up after the murders to accidently spread his DNA, then accidently wiped it on his bronco. Then had his driver run from the police while he had a gun to his head, and was going to commit suicide. Sounds like things an innocent man would do.
Click to expand...

No, he got a call from the wife (who was into hanging with drug dealers and using their product), threw the cash and the wig in the car and raced over....got there, saw the crime scene and fled in a panic, calling his best buddy
 
Taichiliberal said:
No, he got a call from the wife (who was into hanging with drug dealers and using their product), threw the cash and the wig in the car and raced over....got there, saw the crime scene and fled in a panic, calling his best buddy
Click to expand...

Wait, you're talking about OJ the night of the murders?
 
Taichiliberal said:
No, we're talking about Bozo the Clown! :doh:
Click to expand...

The night of the murders he flew to Chicago. His whole premise was he was at home when they occurred. Alan Park was the limo driver who took him to the airport. Park testified he saw OJ walking across his lawn etc.

He fled with AC the day he was suppose to turn himself in.
 
cawacko said:
The night of the murders he flew to Chicago. His whole premise was he was at home when they occurred. Alan Park was the limo driver who took him to the airport. Park testified he saw OJ walking across his lawn etc.

He fled with AC the day he was suppose to turn himself in.
Click to expand...

why he went to the house (phone calls from Nicole)....etc., etc. Bottom line, the idiot premise of this thread requires a willful ignorance of ALL the information available. Belief is one thing, but as the old saying goes 'let them prove it in court'. They couldn't because ALL the facts didn't. Simpson is a sleaze and an arrogant buffoon, but NOT a murderer.
 
Taichiliberal said:
why he went to the house (phone calls from Nicole)....etc., etc. Bottom line, the idiot premise of this thread requires a willful ignorance of ALL the information available. Belief is one thing, but as the old saying goes 'let them prove it in court'. They couldn't because ALL the facts didn't. Simpson is a sleaze and an arrogant buffoon, but NOT a murderer.
Click to expand...

he never claimed he went to the house. that was never introduced in testimony nor in his story of what happened. I'm not sure where you are getting that info from.

What is your timeline for what happened. I'm not sure you understand what actually went down.

And a large majority of America believes OJ to be a murderer and it's not from willful ignorance.
 
Cypress said:
There you have it folks. A maelstrom of racism from rightwing posters and as per usual, silence from their conservative message board brethren.

I was always taught that silence in the face of unrelenting racism and sexism was a sign of low character and cowardice. But maybe that is an ethical lesson only taught in liberal households?
Click to expand...

I wouldn't use the broadest of brushes, or bigotry will swing back right at you. Integrity and character isn't a right or left wing deal, nor is it black or white.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top