BLM Declares Looting "OK", Says It's "Reparations"

[Into the Night]

No, it is not. The tax system gives endless breaks to wealthy and corporations who are recipients of redistribution.

A tax break is not a payment, moron.

Many biggest making corporations pay no taxes and the bosses get huge tax breaks.

Lie. See the U.S. tax code.

The wealthy do not wait around for luck.

Guess you don't know what a casino is.

They make the laws that guarantee them growing wealth.

No, they don't. Their owners help create laws to further capitalism. That is not a guarantee of growing wealth. It is the OPPORTUNITY to grown wealth.

Learn something or shut the fuck up.

Learn something or shut the fuck up, moron.

 

[ExpressLane]

No one would want to waste their time burning down a garbage dump.

That is why the rioters are not burning their own homes.

 

[Into the Night]

There's some vivid income disparities among those you listed as "Discriminated against"

For example, Hindus & Jews are top earners in the USA.

What are they doing, that the others are not?

Bill Gates is neither Hindi nor a Jew.
Donald Trump is neither Hindi nor a Jew.

Fuck your racism and antisemitism.

 

[Truth Detector]

Living Victim is more like it

That works too.

 

[Sailor]

No, it is not. The tax system gives endless breaks to wealthy and corporations who are recipients of redistribution. Many biggest making corporations pay no taxes and the bosses get huge tax breaks. The wealthy do not wait around for luck. They make the laws that guarantee them growing wealth. Learn something or shut the fuck up.

Nothing screams " I am lazy and need welfare" like your statement. Fucking idiot. Get a job you damn bum.

 

[katzgar]

And THUG LIVES MATTER continue to destroy any credibility they ever had (if any), declaring LOOTING "OK" CALLING IT "REPARATIONS", AFTER CONTINUED LOOTING IN CHICAGO.

I'm sure every BLM member who was ever a slave feels gratified.


TIME TO DECLARE THESE ASSHOLES WHAT THEY ARE: A DOMESTIC TERROR GROUP....



Black Lives Matter Holds Rally Supporting Individuals Arrested in Chicago Looting Monday



Members of Black Lives Matter held a solidarity rally on Monday night with the more than 100 individuals who were arrested after a night of looting and unrest in Chicago.

The rally was held at the South Loop police station where organizers say those individuals are currently being held in custody.


Black Lives Matter Chicago organized the rally after overnight unrest throughout the city, with police saying that more than 100 individuals were taken into custody for a variety of offenses, including looting.

“That is reparations,” Atkins said. “Anything they wanted to take, they can take it because these businesses have insurance.”

Chicago police believe the looting began after officers shot a man in the city’s Englewood neighborhood on Sunday afternoon. Authorities say the man, identified as 20-year-old Latrell Allen, had a gun and fired at police before they returned fire, striking and wounding him.




https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/loc...s-arrested-in-chicago-looting-monday/2320365/

now you can answer for all of the school shootings

 

[Grokmaster]

A tax break is not a payment, moron.

Lie. See the U.S. tax code.

Guess you don't know what a casino is.

No, they don't. Their owners help create laws to further capitalism. That is not a guarantee of growing wealth. It is the OPPORTUNITY to grown wealth.

Learn something or shut the fuck up, moron.

THAT FUCKING DUNCE JUST MAKES UP COMPLETE LIES AND POSTS IT HERE, DAILY....

 

[Grokmaster]

now you can answer for all of the school shootings

I DIDN'T DO THEM; DEMOCRATS DID.SEND THE LITTLE BLM BITCHES OUT HERE....YOU COULDN'T PAY THEM TO COME..THEY KNOW BETTER...

 

[Irish]

Next they will say, assault, arson, and murder are okay. Oh wait, THEY ALREADY DO!

 

[Stretch]

Black Lives Matter activist defends Chicago looting as ‘REPARATIONS’ & says it doesn’t matter as stores ‘have insurance’

They have insurance so its OK

Yup. This attitude is called 'situational ethics'. There's no concrete moral compass anymore. Consciences are seared.

 

[Grokmaster]

Yup. This attitude is called 'situational ethics'. There's no concrete moral compass anymore. Consciences are seared.

AKA:"TOTAL BULLSHIT"..AMERICANS ARE SICK UP TO HERE WITH THIS DEMOCRAT SHIT HOLE NONSENSE.....

 

[Stretch]

AKA:"TOTAL BULLSHIT"..AMERICANS ARE SICK UP TO HERE WITH THIS DEMOCRAT SHIT HOLE NONSENSE.....

I'd say some of their priorities are warped when all it takes to feel good about life are Gucci bags and Nike sneakers. That's a pretty low bar for making one feel
self confident and/or a down payment for the life of a possible relative from 250 years ago.

 

[Flash]

Personally, in the absence of economic justice, looting is kid-gloves compared to how white people would respond if the situation were reversed.

Actually, we don't even need to look at that hypothetically...we can just look at what happened in Tulsa in 1921.

You think white people in Tulsa were seeking "economic justice"? What a crock.

 

[Flash]

But you're missing the point, Flash.

To say you are colorblind is to erase that self-evidence of her race.

The message it sends is that "I'm looking PAST THAT to make a judgement about you". It's that "looking PAST THAT" which is racist.

So by saying you don't see color, or are colorblind, what you're really saying is you think someone's race is something so bad it has to be looked past in order for you to judge someone.

Or you're saying you're a dog.

I never said I was color blind. That is another lie on your part. It confirms my post that you make up lies about people and then argue with your own lies.

 

[Flash]

All I do is quote your posts back to you.

If that's not fair, then too bad.

NO. You lie about what I said.

For example, you asked if my wife was "one of the good ones" and then claim I said she was "one of the good ones."

You try to carry on too many conversations at the same time and lose track of what people said, forget important facts, misinterpret their posts, make erroneous assumptions while maintaining a high level of hostility toward all.

 

[Litmus]

I'd say some of their priorities are warped when all it takes to feel good about life are Gucci bags and Nike sneakers. That's a pretty low bar for making one feel
self confident and/or a down payment for the life of a possible relative from 250 years ago.

the seven deadly sins are our reward now.

pure materialiasm.

I dont like much about the Catholicism, but those were good. veryy buddhist.

 

[Litmus]

NO. You lie about what I said.

For example, you asked if my wife was "one of the good ones" and then claim I said she was "one of the good ones."

You try to carry on too many conversations at the same time and lose track of what people said, forget important facts, misinterpret their posts, make erroneous assumptions while maintaining a high level of hostility toward all.

that's how stupid people argue. it's intentional, and he thinks he's fighting the good fight.

 

[Flash]

Facepalm.

So much wrong with these two sentences.

Let's start with the obvious: You say you never said she was a victim of discrimination and prejudice, and then in literally the next sentence say that is has been a victim of prejudice and discrimination.

The next problem with these sentences: You've made whatever your wife has experienced about you. So that is you usurping her experience, denying her voice, to advance what is a very, very, very racist mindset.

The next problem with these sentences: Your second-hand account of what your wife experiences is clearly filtered through your inherent biases, like most of your anecdotes. So you say your wife experienced these things and it gave you a big sad, but you don't say what those experiences were, why they happened, who did them, and where it was done.

So we are left with a vague, generalized, ambiguous narrative, not the truth, that is filtered through your biases because you're relaying your perception of things that happened to someone else entirely.

You've said a lot of shitty things on JPP, but what you've said about your wife, and how you've said it, is the worst.

Again, you can't read: I said "I never said she was a victim of discrimination and prejudice. I said I have seen her face prejudice and discrimination and it was very hurtful for me to see it."

Nowhere does it say she was a victim. Someone can be prejudiced toward me but that doesn't make me a victim. That kind of crap comes from those trying to convince others they are guilty liberals.

You are such a liar. Nobody believes you live in Buckhead. If you do, you are such a huge hypocrite by claiming you have empathy for poor minorities while living in the “Beverly Hills of the East." Now we know we can't believe anything you say which mostly consists of personal insults or calling people racist.

 

[Flash]

This never happened.

When you cannot address an issue or it doesn't fit your preconceived biases you just claim it didn't happen. That is the worst kind of debate.

When I said non-citizens can register to vote by simply checking they are a citizen and gave the example of two Chinese sisters who were not citizens but showed me their voter registration for extra-credit in my class you claimed it did not happen.

Thinking non-citizens can register doesn't fit your talking points and you just deny it. I admit it is a convenient way to debate--you don't need any facts or logic.

When I said about 8 million Obama voters in 2012 voted for Trump in 2016 you said that was a lie and tried to disprove it with some lame math. When I proved your math wrong you never mentioned it again.

 

[cawacko]

Again, you can't read: I said "I never said she was a victim of discrimination and prejudice. I said I have seen her face prejudice and discrimination and it was very hurtful for me to see it."

Nowhere does it say she was a victim. Someone can be prejudiced toward me but that doesn't make me a victim. That kind of crap comes from those trying to convince others they are guilty liberals.

You are such a liar. Nobody believes you live in Buckhead. If you do, you are such a huge hypocrite by claiming you have empathy for poor minorities while living in the “Beverly Hills of the East." Now we know we can't believe anything you say which mostly consists of personal insults or calling people racist.

Flash, you have the patience of Job man continuing to talk to that dude. In fact I question why you do it. And I’m not talking about political disagreement or discussion, that’s what this board is about. I’m talking about the number of times that dude has told you to kill yourself and other nasty things that go far beyond just political disagreement. I’m honestly not sure why you put up with it.

People can have heated discussions. Politics makes people passionate. But what that dude continually says to you goes beyond that. Something ain’t right with him.