California needs to manage the forests and get their electric lines properly maintained.
How do you stop Snowstorms, Hurricanes, or Earthquakes?
California needs to manage the forests and get their electric lines properly maintained. PG&E lines are 2.5 times more likely to fail and cause a fire than the American average, mostly because of age.
https://www.nbcbayarea.com/investig...rate-of-pge-power-line-sparked-fires/2354927/
Yeah. We'll put YOU in charge.
So. What is the first order of business ... raking the Forests?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/pg-e-k...s PG&E estimated,life expectancy was 65 years.PG&E Knew for Years Its Lines Could Spark Wildfires, and Didn’t Fix Them
Documents obtained by The Wall Street Journal show that the utility has long been aware that parts of its 18,500-mile transmission system were dangerously outdated
https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets...power-line-maintenance-california-probe-findsIn 2010, a report commissioned by PG&E suggested the company needed to climb a sample of its towers every three to five years to determine whether they were holding up. PG&E didn't follow that suggestion. The company said it believed its use of ground and aerial inspection was sufficient to keep an eye on its transmission system. A 2017 internal presentation noted that the average age of its towers was 68 years, but the mean life expectancy was only 65 years.
California needs to manage the forests and get their electric lines properly maintained. PG&E lines are 2.5 times more likely to fail and cause a fire than the American average, mostly because of age.
https://www.nbcbayarea.com/investig...rate-of-pge-power-line-sparked-fires/2354927/
California needs to manage the forests and get their electric lines properly maintained. PG&E lines are 2.5 times more likely to fail and cause a fire than the American average, mostly because of age.
https://www.nbcbayarea.com/investig...rate-of-pge-power-line-sparked-fires/2354927/
What does that even mean??
As someone already pointed out, more than half is fed, not state/local.........
You are correct on PG & E & none of them will do any time for the deaths they caused here.......
If a camper starts a fire they will likely be charged, fined & if negligent could spend time in prison........
~Fixing those lines will prevent some fires from starting but the problem remains-an overabundance of fuel in the system.
Decades & decades of prevention in the west has left so much fuel that when a fire does eventually occur the earth is left scorched=sterile 8+inches down which will take much longer to recover, if even possible...
Agreed. California's oppressive environmental and building code rules have pushed the state to where it is. If you can't clear brush and other tender from your property, if the state refuses to build fire breaks in forests, and you are prohibited from taking steps to protect your home from fire by code without onerous permitting processes and inspections, the blame falls entirely and squarely on government.
Agreed. California's oppressive environmental and building code rules have pushed the state to where it is. If you can't clear brush and other tender from your property, if the state refuses to build fire breaks in forests, and you are prohibited from taking steps to protect your home from fire by code without onerous permitting processes and inspections, the blame falls entirely and squarely on government.
I have not been able to verify this but I long ago read an argument that what needs to happen is logging most everything, and planting trees that are better suited for the climate, that what happened was that long ago trees were selected for their use a lumber and pulp (which makes sense) but if we are not going to allow logging then these are not the right trees. THAT I was told was the original sin, not global warming. Obviously this is not something that anyone is going to want to talk about, because it depowers the desired narrative on global warming, because it would take 30 years to accomplish, and because there is no dream even of finding the money to do what ideally would be done.
The only trees that should be planted around there are ones that are native to the area. That's very important stuff.
God knew what he was doing when he put certain trees in certain areas.
That argument fails if the climate is changing significantly.
Anyways California has failed completely up to this point in managing the problem, their work is generally terrible, there is no money, so this problem will in all likelihood never be addressed anywhere close to good enough.
My advice is to give up on California....leave.