T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
so you are saying they should just give up on an industry that creates 47 billion dollars a year? give up on agriculture production that creates 13% of the total agriculture in this country and 99% of the agriculture that produces almonds, figs, olives, peaches, plums, pistachios and walnuts?
You're an idiot, and your complex question fallacy is ignored.
Agriculture uses the bulk of water nationwide. We should be focused on getting it to use that water more efficiently to reduce its consumption. Focusing on homeowners and business will produce far less results than a reduction of water use by agriculture.
For example:
Many of those across the US are not concrete lined. Few have a top covering. Lining irrigation canals and providing a top cover will reduce water loss to near zero and increase the amount delivered by as much as 50% or more. That's a massive savings.
https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/hydraulics_lab/pubs/PAP/PAP-0015.pdf
Going from this
To this:
Or even this:
Is another huge reduction in usage.
But politicians--who are almost uniformly ill-informed technical illiterates--always go for the low hanging fruit and those who don't have the political juice to fight back. It doesn't matter if what they do is useless so long as they can claim they're doing something.