No - YOU are the racist since you support affirmative action and want whites denied jobs just for being white.
she also spits on black people.
No - YOU are the racist since you support affirmative action and want whites denied jobs just for being white.
Yes. The children of Ivy League alumni are both well-connected and wealthy.Weren't some of them legacies?
Pro tip: While I don't ordinarily care about spelling mistakes, if you're going to attempt to insult someone's intelligence, you'd be well served by not putting your own lack of intelligence on display...
Misspellings are a proof of life
It’s hard to program a Russo bot hole to misspell like real humans do
You must not be aware of much brain science
In fact many brilliant people in mans history spelled for shit like I do
Oh
I also type for crap
Lots of brilliant people don’t type so well
You see that’s why they hired secretaries
The secretaries didn’t have to be anything but average intelligence
But the were often excellent at spelling and typing
IDEAS
KNOWLEDGE
Intelligent people know that’s were real intelligence lies
They were admitted because of connections and wealth, not race.
Next.
here's your sign...
Yes. The children of Ivy League alumni are both well-connected and wealthy.
Pro tip: While I don't ordinarily care about spelling mistakes, if you're going to attempt to insult someone's intelligence, you'd be well served by not putting your own lack of intelligence on display...
Under Capitalism it is more about Rich privilege than specifically white privilege.
she also spits on black people.
Yes. The children of Ivy League alumni are both well-connected and wealthy.
Now prove you are more than just a dull tool and comment on my post about capitalism We all know you are incapable There is no power of ideas on your racist head Racists are like that
.I spit in the face of the black guy.
Now prove you are more than just a dull tool and comment on my post about capitalism
We all know you are incapable
There is no power of ideas on your racist head
Racists are like that
That is all fine and good. I do not care about the technicalities or specifics of admissions to those schools.That's not their fault, and in many cases, the parent alumni of the legacy applicant achieved success as a result of their own admission as a student who was not rich or powerful when they graduated.
If lefties accepted their own arguments, that would mean Obama's daughters would not be eligible for legacy consideration at the same schools their father graduated from.
Leftists never think these things through, but you're smart enough to do so.
Legacies are not limited to the "Ivy League".
Legacies are not limited to the elite.
A college applicant is said to have legacy status at a college if a member of the applicant's immediate family attends or attended the college. In other words, if your parents or a sibling attend or attended a college, you would be a legacy applicant for that college.
When a college extends an offer of admission, it wants the student to accept that offer. The rate at which this happens is called the "yield." A high yield means a college is getting the students that it wants, and that will help the school meet its enrollment goals. A legacy applicant is coming from a family that is already familiar with the college, and that family familiarity and loyalty typically leads to a better yield than the general applicant pool.
In general, colleges and universities are most interested in seeing if your immediate family members attended. For example, if you are using The Common Application, the "Family" section of the application will ask you about the education level of your parents and siblings. If you indicate that your parents or siblings attended college, you'll be asked to identify the schools. This is the information that colleges will use to identify your legacy status.
Some Common Mistakes Related to Legacy Status
Assuming that legacy status will make up for a mediocre academic record is a false assumption. Colleges and universities are not going to admit students, legacy or not, who are unlikely to succeed. Legacy status tends to come into play when the admissions officers are comparing two equally qualified applicants. In such cases, the legacy applicant will often have a slight advantage.
Some colleges don't consider legacy status at all, and for those that do consider it, legacy status is just a small factor in admissions decisions. Several pieces of the application will almost always carry more weight than legacy status.
First of all, you will need to have a strong academic record. Without it, you are unlikely to be admitted whether you're a legacy or not. Along similar lines, SAT scores and ACT scores are going to be important unless a school is test-optional. Selective colleges will also be looking for meaningful extracurricular involvement, positive letters of recommendation, and a winning application essay. Legacy status won't compensate for significant weaknesses in any of these areas.
Johns Hopkins University removed legacy status from its admissions equation in 2014, and the result was that the percentage of legacies in the first-year class dropped from 12.5% in 2009 to just 3.5% in 2019. Other prestigious schools including MIT, UC Berkeley, and CalTech also do not consider legacy status in their admissions process.
https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-legacy-status-788436
Plenty of poor blacks are racist fucks.And some are racist fucks
Because they were raised that way
That is all fine and good. I do not care about the technicalities or specifics of admissions to those schools. My point stands. Race doesn't determine who is admitted to Ivy League schools.
All i see is affirmative action black privilege everywhere. Of course whites are more successful but that's because they're smarter. The average black IQ in america is 65!! Most can barely read if at all. There is no conspiracy against blacks. They are mentally handicapped.
Well your a racist
You are too stupid and dishonest to understand anything
It’s why we don’t let you racists define racism
That would be like letting a child molester define child molestation