Lorca
Don't fence me in
What is his position on the 2A?
Can Ted Cruz to the White House in 2016?
- Thread starter Big Money
- Start date
What is his position on the 2A?
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Ted Cruz couldn't get elected dog catcher outside of Texas. As a Democrat, I'd say...go ahead...make our day...nominate Ted Cruz...Hilliary would beat him by the biggest land slide since Reagan put the beat down on Mondale. LOL
Democrats don't like him because his jabs sting and he won't back down.
Cruz doesn't seem to be losing any sleep.
The more he gets attacked, the stronger he'll become, and the more determined.
Before entering the Senate, he argued for a living and was good enough at it to make a handsome living while building a reputation as one of the best constitutional lawyers.
Harvard Law School Alan Dershowitz, no conservative, told the Washington Post that Cruz was "off-the-charts brilliant."
Cruz has been named by American Lawyer magazine as one of the 50 Best Litigators under 45 in America in the country. In his 30s, he argued nine cases before the Supreme Court and won.
Whenever he is challenged, his energy level goes up, his backbone stiffens, and his wits sharpen. From that point, it's game on.
Cruz doesn't care about being popular or part of the in-crowd. He's comfortable with conflict.
He can't be intimidated or scared off. He doesn't care if other senators isolate him, ignore him or attack him. He doesn't care if they let him into their club. So they have no power over him.
As unpopular as he is within the Beltway, he is keenly aware that in the heartland and across the country his stance in defiance of Obamacare, and his willingness to rock the political boat, have transformed him into a rock star.
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/10/09/opinion/navarrette-cruz-obamacare/
That's not to mention that there are about a dozen other national level Democrats who would beat him like an old rug too. So...go ahead...nominate him...make us happy! LOL
Liberty
Libertarian Minded
We'll just have to see. Won't we?
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
I'd tend to agree, but then I remember that I felt the same way about GW.
The fact that GW was a 2-termer really shows that the electorate is capable of almost any kind of insanity.
Don't be so optimistic. The R's are going to treat him like dead meat from here on in. There's not a chance of having him for the R's and guaranteeing an easy victory for Clinton or any other D.
Liberty
Libertarian Minded
Some people seem to think that most people want an authoritarian marxist gov't ruling over them, or that marxism represents freedom. And if you don't, you live on an island somewhere, or you're an anarchist, and our numbers are small.Btw, is this even necessary to say on the Internet? Or anywhere?
The point is, most people don't think that way. Even if a few seem to think so.
Lorca
Don't fence me in
Do you always re-state the obvious in your posts?
Give us a break on scrolling, how about it?
It's quite surprising that any bagger supporter would continue to show his face on a thread about Cruz. Isn't it painfully obvious by now that he's finished?
The Republican party is now going to concentrate on saving their own worthless hides and baggers don't play a part in that!
The Republican party is now going to concentrate on saving their own worthless hides and baggers don't play a part in that!
People will ask for backup, so here is the story from Forbes
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2013/03/16/meet-ted-cruz-second-amendment-hypocrite/
This coming from the dimwitted troll whore who thinks trolling equates to subtance?
You really are THAT stupid.
Now run back to that gated trailer park you crawled out of; I think I hear your second cousin wife calling you.
Are you deliberately this stupid, or does it come naturally for you? I don't think I have ever seen someone so purposefully dumb in my life; other than the vulgar asshat Desh.
One would almost think they pay you to be purposefully stupid.
Screeching profanities and insults will be about all we hear from you from now on in. Teenage bagger twit!
That's a fascinating, yet stupidly false claim dimwit. After Republicans took over the Congress, they were successful in bringing back fiscal sanity which is something dimwitted Democrats are incapable of. Republicans won the White House after the Clinton debacle for two terms.
I'm confused how this is down the toilet? Do you ever consider using facts before you make such incredibly stupid comments?
No you can't; you're a dimwit. Dimwits don't think. They are trained monkeys who run around political forums parroting the idiot talking points of their DNC trainers.
Dunce.
Liberty
Libertarian Minded
Well,,,, excuuuuuse me.
This is your brain on stupid; don't do stupid.
Yo, dimwit; you calling others stupid is the pinacle of irony.
But you're a dimwit; how could you possibly know that, yes, you really are THAT stupid.
You do realize that by arguing with an idiot like BOC, you have now entered the never ending circle of stupidity?
You can't win this; you can on,y be dragged down to their dimwit level, then get beat by experience.
