Can you forgive those who put "unvaccinated" people through a living hell for 2+ yrs?

AssHatZombie said:
i ready for you to intellectually dominate me.

you pick the topic.
Click to expand...

Why would I bother? You honestly come across as little more than a joke. Sorry, if you want to discuss something start a thread or respond to the topic of this thread. I couldn't care less what you think you are expert on or what is happening in your world right now. You simply don't rise to the level of me caring. Sorry!
 
Dutch Uncle said:
QED

Lying, hateful fuckwits have no scruples and you people are lying, hateful fuckwits.
Click to expand...

6960f747abf0e6de37425c7a747e1814.jpg
 
Yakuda said:
I dont expect a leftists to know what scruples are
Click to expand...

LOL. So indeed your point was that YOU don't understand what scruples are? I posted a picture that was a joke and you somehow drew a conclusion about my moral positions from it? I think you are just hoping people view you as smarter than you really are so you randomly choose words that sound intellectual.

Try again, skippy.
 
gfm7175 said:
Trump is a proper noun, thus is capitalized, no matter how much you happen to hate the man.

Only the fake news about him is fake news.
Click to expand...

You just posted a logical fallacy, circular reasoning. Shame shame.

I'll capitalize trump's name when you stop referring to Democrats as "Demonkratts," a word that doesn't exist in any language.
 
christiefan915 said:
You just posted a logical fallacy, circular reasoning. Shame shame.

I'll capitalize trump's name when you stop referring to Democrats as "Demonkratts," a word that doesn't exist in any language.
Click to expand...

Paranoid Schizos are not well known for being logical. :)
 
christiefan915 said:
You just posted a logical fallacy, circular reasoning. Shame shame.
Click to expand...
Circular reasoning is not a logical fallacy. Too bad you don't know what a circular argument fallacy is. Shame shame.

christiefan915 said:
I'll capitalize trump's name
Click to expand...
See. I knew that you were doing it on purpose.

christiefan915 said:
when you stop referring to Democrats as "Demonkratts," a word that doesn't exist in any language.
Click to expand...
I don't say Demonkratts... I say Demonkkkrats. The word exists, as I have created it. Demonkkkrats refers to their demonic/Satanic party platform, their founding, funding, and support for the KKK and for racism/bigotry in general, and their "rat"-like sneaky and conniving ways.

That particular wording/spelling highlights precisely what the Democrat Party is and stands for, thus is why I do it on forums that allow free speech (such as this one).
 
gfm7175 said:
Circular reasoning is not a logical fallacy. Too bad you don't know what a circular argument fallacy is. Shame shame.
Click to expand...

Smarter people than you say otherwise.

In informal logic, circular reasoning is an argument that commits the logical fallacy of assuming what it is attempting to prove. Fallacies closely related to circular reasoning include begging the question and petitio principii.

  • "The circular argument uses its own conclusion as one of its stated or unstated premises. Instead of offering proof, it simply asserts the conclusion in another form, thereby inviting the listener to accept it as settled when, in fact, it has not been settled. Because the premise is no different from and therefore as questionable as its conclusion, a circular argument violates the criterion of acceptability." (T. Edward Damer, Attacking Faulty Reasoning. Wadsworth, 2001)

See. I knew that you were doing it on purpose.
Click to expand...
:rolleyes: And in other news, water is wet. Of course it's on purpose, as are all insults I've directed at your malignant messiah for the last seven years.

I don't say Demonkratts... I say Demonkkkrats. The word exists, as I have created it. Demonkkkrats refers to their demonic/Satanic party platform, their founding, funding, and support for the KKK and for racism/bigotry in general, and their "rat"-like sneaky and conniving ways.

That particular wording/spelling highlights precisely what the Democrat Party is and stands for, thus is why I do it on forums that allow free speech (such as this one).
Click to expand...

It exists in your addled brain only. Get back to me when it enters the OED.
 
christiefan915 said:
Smarter people than you say otherwise.

In informal logic, circular reasoning is an argument that commits the logical fallacy of assuming what it is attempting to prove. Fallacies closely related to circular reasoning include begging the question and petitio principii.

  • "The circular argument uses its own conclusion as one of its stated or unstated premises. Instead of offering proof, it simply asserts the conclusion in another form, thereby inviting the listener to accept it as settled when, in fact, it has not been settled. Because the premise is no different from and therefore as questionable as its conclusion, a circular argument violates the criterion of acceptability." (T. Edward Damer, Attacking Faulty Reasoning. Wadsworth, 2001)

:rolleyes: And in other news, water is wet. Of course it's on purpose, as are all insults I've directed at your malignant messiah for the last seven years.
Click to expand...
Circular reasoning is not a circular argument fallacy, dude. They are two different things.

Plus, fake news is a defined term. Anything that is fake news is fake news by proof of identity. A cat is a cat... a dog is a dog... a green marker is a green marker... fake news is fake news.

You still suck at logic.
 
christiefan915 said:
Smarter people than you say otherwise.
Click to expand...
'Expert' worship. Sorry, it is YOU discarding logic here.
christiefan915 said:

In informal logic, circular reasoning is an argument that commits the logical fallacy of assuming what it is attempting to prove. Fallacies closely related to circular reasoning include begging the question and petitio principii.

  • "The circular argument uses its own conclusion as one of its stated or unstated premises. Instead of offering proof, it simply asserts the conclusion in another form, thereby inviting the listener to accept it as settled when, in fact, it has not been settled. Because the premise is no different from and therefore as questionable as its conclusion, a circular argument violates the criterion of acceptability." (T. Edward Damer, Attacking Faulty Reasoning. Wadsworth, 2001)
Click to expand...
A circular argument is not a fallacy. It is also called the argument of faith. Attempting to PROVE a circular argument either True or False is the Circular Argument Fallacy. It is not related to begging the question at all. Attempting to prove a circular argument either True or False is the fallacy. This is what a fundamentalist does.
In logic, the circular argument simply states: A
Attempting to prove a circular argument True states: ?A->A, a fallacy, due to the predicate being used as a proof.
Attempting to prove a circular argument False states: ?!A->!A, a fallacy, due to the predicate being used as a proof, and due to a negative proof.

The circular argument simply states the existence of A. ALL theories, including theories of science, begin as circular arguments.
christiefan915 said:
:rolleyes: And in other news, water is wet. Of course it's on purpose, as are all insults I've directed at your malignant messiah for the last seven years.
Click to expand...
Bulverism fallacy.
christiefan915 said:
It exists in your addled brain only. Get back to me when it enters the OED.
Click to expand...
Nope. It exists right here on on JPP, since he posted it here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top