I'm not trying to make a case. YOU ARE. Quoting leftist propaganda won't work. The topic is Canadian and Mexican steel not taking contracts from the United States. Go read the OP again.
A fair amount is. They also use natural gas.
Steel and how to make it is not new technology.
Random words. No apparent coherency.
You are hallucinating again, Sybil.
Canada does not sell electricity to the United States. They don't control the ERIC, TRIC, or WRIC either.
Canada does not sell electricity to the United States. Stop quoting leftist bullshit from MSNBC. Pravda is lying to you.
Dead wrong. Each of these states and the SOTNY generate their own electricity.
Not unless you live in the SOTNY or the SDTC.
So your fear mongering is just hooey. I already knew that.
Canada does not sell electricity to the United States. The United States generates it's own power.Some idiot actually claimed we depend on Canada for electricity? lol that's hilarious.
For the better part of two decades, Canada has exported significantly more electricity to the United States than it imported. However, in the fall of 2023, electricity trade between the two countries became more balanced. The shift was due partly to Canada’s reduced hydropower generation, the country’s primary source of electricity generation, as drought conditions reduced inflow to reservoirs in western Canada. In addition, lower natural gas prices in the United States reduced power prices, making U.S. electricity more competitive.
Monthly average exports from the United States to Canada in 2023 increased 70% on a year-over-year basis to 1,809 gigawatthours (GWh), while monthly average imports from Canada to the United States decreased by 36% to 3,315 GWh. In 2023, the United States remained a net importer of Canada’s power on an annual basis, but the amount of electricity received fell sharply from 42 terawatthours (TWh) in 2022 to 15 TWh in 2023. The decline in imports from Canada was large enough that by September 2023 the United States switched to become a net electricity exporter to Canada, which continued for five of the next nine months, according to EIA’s Quarterly Electricity Imports and Exports Report.
Electricity exchanges across the United States and Canada—historically each other’s largest electricity trading partners—remain relatively small, representing less than 1% of their respective total generation.
14 TWhs can be produced by two nuclear power plants; a typical nuke plant produces about 7.9 TWh. per year.
Seven. In addition, the SOTNY, the SOHI, and the SDTC have banned new construction of them.
There are over a hundred steel mills in the United States. The only thing an integrated mill does is also manufacture the pig iron on the same site.
Canada does not sell electricity to the United States.
Canada does not sell electricity to the United States.
The United States generates it's own power. They also control the ERIC, TRIC, and WRIC.
Cars don't need an electrical grid to run. They generate their own electricity.
The Canadians cannot shut down the ERIC, TRIC, or WRIC.
Go listen to Elon Musk again, Sybil. You are hallucinating again.
www.theguardian.com
Well from the article I posted from the US government, it says they provide several stated in the mid west and other states in the upper north east.Rubbish. They merely provide a little balancing during unpredictable peaks , same as we do for them. Those states that are using them for that are inflicting themselves with that problem. Trump has nothing to do with it. You're just parroting rubbish from your bosses, is all.
Example in New York:
A nuclear plant’s closure was hailed as a green win. Then emissions went up
Shuttering of New York facility raises awkward climate crisis questions as gas – not renewables – fills gap in power generation
Since the plant’s closure, it has been gas, rather then clean energy such as solar and wind, that has filled the void, leaving New York City in the embarrassing situation of seeing its planet-heating emissions jump in recent years to the point its power grid is now dirtier than Texas’s, as well as the US average.
Here is the link I posted . press on MSNRubbish. They merely provide a little balancing during unpredictable peaks , same as we do for them. Those states that are using them for that are inflicting themselves with that problem. Trump has nothing to do with it. You're just parroting rubbish from your bosses, is all.
Example in New York:
A nuclear plant’s closure was hailed as a green win. Then emissions went up
Shuttering of New York facility raises awkward climate crisis questions as gas – not renewables – fills gap in power generation
Since the plant’s closure, it has been gas, rather then clean energy such as solar and wind, that has filled the void, leaving New York City in the embarrassing situation of seeing its planet-heating emissions jump in recent years to the point its power grid is now dirtier than Texas’s, as well as the US average.
As you can see the info came from the US Energy information administration.
Not facts. Go learn what 'fact' means.
Coal is still used in a lot of steel plants since it's a good source of carbon to make the alloy. It is also used in a lot of them to fire the blast furnace. So is natural gas. Hydrogen is not used because it doesn't have enough BTUs per volume. It also causes brittle steel.
Same engineering. Not much to a blast furnace.
Random words. No apparent coherency. Ignoring this portion.
That they would, mostly because they don't understand how cleanly coal can be burned. But, they never do their homework.
Why? Nuclear power is not renewable energy. Natural gas, oil, and coal ARE renewable energy and even cheaper to build and operate. ALL of them can burn fuel quite cleanly these days.
That is correct. Solar and wind are piddle power. Solar is the most expensive method of generating electricity. Wind is the 2nd most expensive. Nuclear power plants are MUCH cheaper than either solar or wind!
I agree.
I have already given you that information, Tball. RQAA
