civil war is inevitable

Sailor said:
Yawn. I feel bad for you pudgy. To much junk food, not much intellect. Polish you poor bastard. As I said earlier that head of yours screams you got you ass kicked one to many times. Typical progressive. Thinks way to much about their actual capabilities.
Click to expand...

dutch uncle is king simp though.
 
AssHatZombie said:
dutch uncle is king simp though.
Click to expand...

I get along with him AHZ. You know there are some good intellectual folks on this board like yourself and him that let politics get in the way of good debate. I enjoy reading your views on things. Really makes one think. Dutch writes good things also.
Just my two cents.
 
anatta said:
you are beyond stoopid.. what part of "she routinely used her server for Emails instead" do you not understand??

she didn't use any State Dept EMAIL -she used he server instead

fucking dolt
Click to expand...

He's just using the same tactic as Trumpsters used to defend Trump: Mostly emotion with very little logic or solidly referenced.

The New York Times ran a very extensive article on Hillary's habits with email servers and her practices. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/27/us/politics/hillary-clinton-state-department-email-inquiry.html
Hillary Clinton and her advisers have offered a series of explanations over the last year for her decision to use a private email server as secretary of state, a decision that she said again on Thursday had been “a mistake.”...

...While the report said that Mrs. Clinton had never been authorized to set up a private email server and that her decision to use one had compromised security at the department she ran, it left a number of questions unanswered. One was why she had decided to use her own server, and ultimately risk damage to her political career, in the first place.

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/p...-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system
Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).
 
Sailor said:
I get along with him AHZ. You know there are some good intellectual folks on this board like yourself and him that let politics get in the way of good debate. I enjoy reading your views on things. Really makes one think. Dutch writes good things also.
Just my two cents.
Click to expand...

he's a china cocksucking globalist fake libertarian simp, sorry.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
He's just using the same tactic as Trumpsters used to defend Trump: Mostly emotion with very little logic or solidly referenced.

The New York Times ran a very extensive article on Hillary's habits with email servers and her practices. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/27/us/politics/hillary-clinton-state-department-email-inquiry.html
Hillary Clinton and her advisers have offered a series of explanations over the last year for her decision to use a private email server as secretary of state, a decision that she said again on Thursday had been “a mistake.”...

...While the report said that Mrs. Clinton had never been authorized to set up a private email server and that her decision to use one had compromised security at the department she ran, it left a number of questions unanswered. One was why she had decided to use her own server, and ultimately risk damage to her political career, in the first place.

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/p...-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system
Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).
Click to expand...

she's an arrogant cunt who felt untouchable, and intent is not part of those laws.

Why are you repeating this crap?

because you're king simp.
 
AssHatZombie said:
it's a universal definition, king simp.
Click to expand...

Dude, it's a generational, gender-bullshit thing. If I wrote "Whooooa! Take a gander at those gams!" most Millennials would have to Google to figure out what I just wrote. You love the word "simp" and that tells me several things about you. Not by itself, but in combination with many other traits and habits including POV.
 
AssHatZombie said:
she's an arrogant cunt who felt untouchable, and intent is not part of those laws.

Why are you repeating this crap?

because you're king simp.
Click to expand...

Misogynistic incel/homosexual attitude
checkmark-red.png


Defensive Millennial "you owe me" attitude
checkmark-red.png


Twentysomething Twerpish outlook.
checkmark-red.png


Dude, if you are over thirty, you need to start getting a fucking grip before life passes you by.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top