Clarence Thomas secretly went on lavish vacations in luxury jets and superyachts paid

I'm a hard left social democrat who seriously loathes Thomas,

but being jealous of perks is outright communism, a step even beyond me.
 
Doc Dutch said:
Thomas was always identified as a conservative. Even the appearance of impropriety tarnishes SCOTUS....which, since 2016, have become extremely tarnished.

If you remember the Bill Clinton Lincoln bedroom scandal and the Clinton Foundation scandal where large donations gave an appearance of impropriety and buying access, then you should agree that the actions of Thomas are no different.
Click to expand...

Thomas is on the Supremes. That makes it all different. It is the highest court in the land and is supposed to decide neutrally according to law. Crow has been buying Thomas for over 20 years. This is much worse than a Lincoln bedroom event.
 
Nordberg said:
Thomas is on the Supremes. That makes it all different. It is the highest court in the land and is supposed to decide neutrally according to law. Crow has been buying Thomas for over 20 years. This is much worse than a Lincoln bedroom event.
Click to expand...

Shouldn't all of our representatives in all three branches be fair and just in how they execute their duties? Why are you giving politicians a pass and only condemning judges?
 
Theywillneverlearn! said:
Obviously you do not know me at all. You poor dumb bastard. democrat of course.
Click to expand...

I've read your posts, Sailor. What more do I need to know?

Why did you run like a cowardly chickenshit when asked about your knowledge of guno?

Wrong again, dumbass. Libertarian, not a Democrat, and I've never voted Democrat. Although I've mellowed with age, I used to be very Right Wing, American-style, not today's fascist one country, one party, one leader bullshit you are pushing.

7htngy.jpg
 
Doc Dutch said:
I've read your posts, Sailor. What more do I need to know?

Why did you run like a cowardly chickenshit when asked about your knowledge of guno?

Wrong again, dumbass. Libertarian, not a Democrat, and I've never voted Democrat. Although I've mellowed with age, I used to be very Right Wing, American-style, not today's fascist one country, one party, one leader bullshit you are pushing.

7htngy.jpg
Click to expand...

Wow. Old Doc is feeling his oats today. Geritol kicking in Gramps? Because in real life you would just stand there and piss yourself. As I am sure you always have.
 
Theywillneverlearn! said:
Guno. Absolutely. That is why he can only post stupid GIF's like you do. And never answer directly to the questions. Hmmmm...
Click to expand...

Speaking of never answering questions, why won't you explain why you hate guno, blacks and Jews, Sailor? Why do you call him white and Christian?

7htqkk.gif
 
Nordberg said:
Thomas is on the Supremes. That makes it all different. It is the highest court in the land and is supposed to decide neutrally according to law. Crow has been buying Thomas for over 20 years. This is much worse than a Lincoln bedroom event.
Click to expand...

Is ruling neutrally code for its neutral when you agree and not a neutral ruling when you disagree?

You still haven’t shown how Thomas supposedly changed his judicial philosophy on the bench from his first ten years until after Crow supposedly “bought” him. I can answer why, because Thomas hasn’t changed. His judicial philosophy has been the same since he joined the court. You just don’t like it.
 
guno said:
He is a bitter old drunk who follows me around, he is not interest in discussion
Click to expand...

I'm always curious about people who claim to be veterans then spend most of their time screaming "stolen valor" against others.

Like Matt Dillon, Sailor does seem to have severe anger issues. A wellness check might do him some good.
 
Doc Dutch said:
I'm always curious about people who claim to be veterans then spend most of their time screaming "stolen valor" against others.

Like Matt Dillon, Sailor does seem to have severe anger issues. A wellness check might do him some good.
Click to expand...

Might be because sailor was beached and blackballed from going to sea
 
cawacko said:
Is ruling neutrally code for its neutral when you agree and not a neutral ruling when you disagree?

You still haven’t shown how Thomas supposedly changed his judicial philosophy on the bench from his first ten years until after Crow supposedly “bought” him. I can answer why, because Thomas hasn’t changed. His judicial philosophy has been the same since he joined the court. You just don’t like it.
Click to expand...

he has always been a far rightys, but he and his wife have gone to a level never seen on the court or around it. They are conspiracy nuts that would be fine of this board. Like all the rightys, they claimed they would be fair and call balls and stril\kes as fairly as possible. He lied. Kavanaugh lied. Barrett died. They had a far right agenda to impose on the country. Biden should have expanded the court.
 
Nordberg said:
he has always been a far rightys, but he and his wife have gone to a level never seen on the court or around it. They are conspiracy nuts that would be fine of this board. Like all the rightys, they claimed they would be fair and call balls and stril\kes as fairly as possible. He lied. Kavanaugh lied. Barrett died. They had a far right agenda to impose on the country. Biden should have expanded the court.
Click to expand...

He's always been a far righty but somehow he became even more of a far righty in his judicial decisions? (what does his wife have to do with anything regarding his rulings?) Can you point to any cases which show him going from a far righty to the next level in his rulings?

You're free to your opinion of course buy you're just a(n) (extreme) partisan so therefore anyone who doesn't rule like you want them to must be acting in bad faith, must be a liar and must be "bought".
 
cawacko said:
Is ruling neutrally code for its neutral when you agree and not a neutral ruling when you disagree?

You still haven’t shown how Thomas supposedly changed his judicial philosophy on the bench from his first ten years until after Crow supposedly “bought” him. I can answer why, because Thomas hasn’t changed. His judicial philosophy has been the same since he joined the court. You just don’t like it.
Click to expand...

It is true Thomas has never had respect for the Constitution. He has always wanted his right-wing beliefs to be law. However, he has Crow whispering into his ear again and again. he is getting pushed constantly. Thomas never expressed his conspiratorial beliefs in the past. Now he wants them to be law.
I was happier when judges were not so proudly out of the mainstream. and against the constitution.
 
Nordberg said:
It is true Thomas has never had respect for the Constitution. He has always wanted his right-wing beliefs to be law. However, he has Crow whispering into his ear again and again. he is getting pushed constantly. Thomas never expressed his conspiratorial beliefs in the past. Now he wants them to be law.
I was happier when judges were not so proudly out of the mainstream. and against the constitution.
Click to expand...

The constitution in this case means judicial rulings that you like/approve of. There are people who think your vision of how the court should rule is anti-constitutional.

One doesn’t have to care for Thomas’ judicial philosophy but he’s been consistent in his beliefs since he’s entered the court. You can’t point to anything that even remotely shows one person supposedly whispering in his ear has changed him.
 
cawacko said:
Is ruling neutrally code for its neutral when you agree and not a neutral ruling when you disagree?

You still haven’t shown how Thomas supposedly changed his judicial philosophy on the bench from his first ten years until after Crow supposedly “bought” him. I can answer why, because Thomas hasn’t changed. His judicial philosophy has been the same since he joined the court. You just don’t like it.
Click to expand...

His accepting all those expensive gifts will make people wonder if he is ruling fairly, or if the bribes are swaying his votes. Either way, it is bad for the court. The Roberts court is the most pro-corporate, anti-worker of all time. They have enough problems justifying their votes without the appearance of bribery hanging over them. Thomas is hurting the court.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top