“Climate change has amplified the strength of hurricanes”

I readily admit that when getting into the weeds on climate issues I'm out of my element. But I will say one of the books I really enjoyed was by Steven Koonin called Unsettled?. He was in the Obama Administration and he's not a denier that man plays a role in climate change but it was eye opening in him showing how the media manipulates the headlines and data that gets reported.

I read the reviews of the book because I wanted to see what those disagreeing said and it has the usual complaints. But his viewpoint was the emergency that justifies basically any money spent on climate change is worth it is not necessarily the case.
Which is why it's important to trust experts like NASA and other reputable science sources. I already posted to you in this:
Sorry, Wacko, but I believe the good folks at NASA over politicians.

 
So again, what the hell does any of that have to do with the thread on the increased intensity of hurricanes due to climate change

You asked if you "got hurricanes in NYC", Anchovies.

You do.

How come you didn't know that, if you live there, Anchovies?

Answer the question, Anchovies.

I wouldn't have believed that your credibility could sink any lower, Anchovies, but you're certainly on your way.
 
“Climate change has amplified the strength of Atlantic hurricanes by an average of 18 miles per hour in the last six years”

“Warmer waters are fueling more storms with vastly increased wind speeds. Between 2019 and 2023, 40 hurricanes saw wind increases sufficient to elevate them by at least one category on the Saffir-Simpson hurricane intensity scale, according to the study published in the journal Environmental Research: Climate.”

“Three hurricanes, including this month's Rafael, experienced a substantial speed boost caused by climate change, which moved them up two categories.”


But, but, but some nobody weatherman in nowhereville “proved” climate change is a hoax

Hope Floridians are enjoying DeSantis’s attacks on “climate ideology”
No it hasn’t
 
You asked if you "got hurricanes in NYC", Anchovies.

You do.

How come you didn't know that, if you live there, Anchovies?

Answer the question, Anchovies.

I wouldn't have believed that your credibility could sink any lower, Anchovies, but you're certainly on your way.
I was cynically responding to your red hat club comrade whose offering was inane and irrelevant to the thread as your own. And by the way, in 250 years, NYC has seen a hurricane thirteen times, never a class 5, which has become more frequent in warm water States

And for the last time, what the hell does any of that have to do with the thread on the increased intensity of hurricanes due to climate change
 
I was cynically responding to your red hat club comrade whose offering was inane and irrelevant to the thread as your own. And by the way, in 250 years, NYC has seen a hurricane thirteen times, never a class 5, which has become more frequent in warm water States

And for the last time, what the hell does any of that have to do with the thread on the increased intensity of hurricanes due to climate change

So you were feigning ignorance, Anchovies?

I don't believe you. You don't need to act ignorant, Anchovies. Just be yourself.
 
“Climate change has amplified the strength of Atlantic hurricanes by an average of 18 miles per hour in the last six years”

“Warmer waters are fueling more storms with vastly increased wind speeds. Between 2019 and 2023, 40 hurricanes saw wind increases sufficient to elevate them by at least one category on the Saffir-Simpson hurricane intensity scale, according to the study published in the journal Environmental Research: Climate.”

“Three hurricanes, including this month's Rafael, experienced a substantial speed boost caused by climate change, which moved them up two categories.”


But, but, but some nobody weatherman in nowhereville “proved” climate change is a hoax

Hope Floridians are enjoying DeSantis’s attacks on “climate ideology”
Got any math or are you just another parrot in the line?


So, to reverse the argument, what is the opportunity cost of not addressing climate change?
Pascals wager fallacy.
 
Which has zero to do with the warmer water feeding the intensity of hurricanes
But it has everything to do with the amount of damage and costs associated with hurricanes that hit the region...

Put another way, their argument is that hurricanes have changed in intensity and volume causing more damage, while what I see is hurricanes are essentially just the same while there is far more 'stuff' for them to damage and destroy.
 
Got any math or are you just another parrot in the line?

Since Katrina, hurricanes have been the poster child for climate change.

But, several lines of empirical data cast doubt on claims that climate change is causing a measurable increase in global hurricane activity. Read more here:


Fourth time we’ve seen the same nowhereville “proof” regurgitated
 
Why I refer to it as opportunity costs, they are too high for future generations to risk it
Nope. You are simply making a Pascal's Wager fallacy. There is no such thing as "Climate Change" outside your WACKY religion so there is no reason to somehow believe it just because you are claiming extremely grave nonexistent consequences for your nonexistent physics violations.

Hey, did you notice your complete lack of any unambiguous definition of the global climate that doesn't violate physics, math or logic? I did. I also know why you can never have one.

And not to sound repetitive, but the opportunities cost is too high
Learn economics. That's not what "opportunity cost" is.
 
Back
Top