Clinton v. McCain, within the margin of error!

Jarod said:
You belive his age is why he lost?
Click to expand...
I believe that it effected his candidacy negatively, and by a large margin.

Things that I noticed.

When he walked around randomly during the debates. The old man whistle. The Shuffle.

All of these things will be noticed, at least sub-consciously, and effect how people think of him, how they'll receive his ideas.

I think he would have made a better candidate if he were younger and wish he had beaten Bush in the 2000 campaign.
 
Damocles said:
I believe that it effected his candidacy negatively, and by a large margin.

Things that I noticed.

When he walked around randomly during the debates. The old man whistle. The Shuffle.

All of these things will be noticed, at least sub-consciously, and effect how people think of him, how they'll receive his ideas.

I think he would have made a better candidate if he were younger and wish he had beaten Bush in the 2000 campaign.
Click to expand...

I agree with that, but bigger reasons he lost were Sarah Palien and the "emergency" he declared just prior to the first debate.
 
Jarod said:
I agree with that, but bigger reasons he lost were Sarah Palien and the "emergency" he declared just prior to the first debate.
Click to expand...

no, the liberal media shit on palin and shit on mccain's emergency trip to washington. obama get's elected and when he is president, there is *all of a sudden* an economic emergency that requires vast sums of money and a quick vote, else america is going to be in a worse economic state than the depression thus saith obama....

obama made some phone calls, mccain did his job and went back to washington. do you really think it mattered what mccain did? the media had their president and the sheeple like you bought it hook line and sinker
 
Darla said:
He needed some seasoning, but he's far from hollow. I have always been very keen on his passion for poverty, which is an issue very close to my heart, and other than women's rights, probably the issue I am most passionate about.

And while he might have lost his seat then, he would not lose it now. My how the worm has turned in two years, no?
Click to expand...
and then it turned again on that philandering fuck. He would have lost in 08 even with all the Dem surge.
 
Yurt said:
no, the liberal media shit on palin and shit on mccain's emergency trip to washington. obama get's elected and when he is president, there is *all of a sudden* an economic emergency that requires vast sums of money and a quick vote, else america is going to be in a worse economic state than the depression thus saith obama....

obama made some phone calls, mccain did his job and went back to washington. do you really think it mattered what mccain did? the media had their president and the sheeple like you bought it hook line and sinker
Click to expand...


The "all of a sudden" was before Obama was elected. Must have the "vast sum" of money ($3/4 trillion) and a "quick vote" by Monday!, so "saith" bush/Paulson.
Palin shitteth upon herself, she was a lousy choice selected hastily for convenience to satisfy the Far Right and to split the women's vote, not for vaunted capability. Who was it that won the hearts of voters with a $150,000credit card spending spree?
 
Last edited:
Lets face it the GOP could have run Jesus Christ and he wouldn't have beaten Obama: it was time for an Affirmative Action presidency. It sucks that the guy had to be so pitifully inept and liberal and we'll all suffer like we did with Carter but we'll get through it.
 
Southern Man said:
Lets face it the GOP could have run Jesus Christ and he wouldn't have beaten Obama: it was time for an Affirmative Action presidency. It sucks that the guy had to be so pitifully inept and liberal and we'll all suffer like we did with Carter but we'll get through it.
Click to expand...
An Affirmative Action Presidency? That is conservative racist code for "he isn't qualified for the job but we had to vote for a darkie now!" If by qualified you mean he wasn't a life time politician which most of you right wingers decry then you are right, but the man is without a doubt one of the most intelligent men we have ever elected to that office. He has handled it very well given the circumstances he was handed on January 21. You may not like him but he is infinitely more equipped to handle the job than the failure you voted for in 2000 and 2004.
 
Socrtease said:
An Affirmative Action Presidency? That is conservative racist code for "he isn't qualified for the job but we had to vote for a darkie now!" If by qualified you mean he wasn't a life time politician which most of you right wingers decry then you are right, but the man is without a doubt one of the most intelligent men we have ever elected to that office. He has handled it very well given the circumstances he was handed on January 21. You may not like him but he is infinitely more equipped to handle the job than the failure you voted for in 2000 and 2004.
Click to expand...

Socrtease, speaking truth to idiocy for thousands of years.
 
Socrtease said:
An Affirmative Action Presidency? That is conservative racist code for "he isn't qualified for the job but we had to vote for a darkie now!" If by qualified you mean he wasn't a life time politician which most of you right wingers decry then you are right, but the man is without a doubt one of the most intelligent men we have ever elected to that office. He has handled it very well given the circumstances he was handed on January 21. You may not like him but he is infinitely more equipped to handle the job than the failure you voted for in 2000 and 2004.
Click to expand...
Why would that be racist? Its a liberal policy. Are liberals racist for wanting Affirmative Action?

Based solely on the number of umms and ahhs when his teleprompter goes down I don't see how any serious person can reasonable insist that Obama has much more than average intelligence never mind being the most intelligent.

Perhaps the students at UMass Amherst are peeing in the Quabbin Reservoir again and, as a consumer of that water in Boston it's having an affect on your judgment.
 
Yurt said:
no, the liberal media shit on palin and shit on mccain's emergency trip to washington. obama get's elected and when he is president, there is *all of a sudden* an economic emergency that requires vast sums of money and a quick vote, else america is going to be in a worse economic state than the depression thus saith obama....

obama made some phone calls, mccain did his job and went back to washington. do you really think it mattered what mccain did? the media had their president and the sheeple like you bought it hook line and sinker
Click to expand...

Blame the media, never accept personal responsability, the Republican Mantra!
 
Southern Man said:
Lets face it the GOP could have run Jesus Christ and he wouldn't have beaten Obama: it was time for an Affirmative Action presidency. It sucks that the guy had to be so pitifully inept and liberal and we'll all suffer like we did with Carter but we'll get through it.
Click to expand...

Jesus would never have run on a Republican ticket.
 
Jarod said:
Jesus would never have run on a Republican ticket.
Click to expand...

I would have thought that a long-haired Jew, wearing sandals, would have a hard time attracting any sizeable degree of support during the Republican primary process.
 
charver said:
I would have thought that a long-haired Jew, wearing sandals, would have a hard time attracting any sizeable degree of support during the Republican primary process.
Click to expand...

Good point, even had he chosen to run as a Republican he would have found less support than Mitt Romney at a Southern Baptist Convention.
 
charver said:
I would have thought that a long-haired Jew, wearing sandals, would have a hard time attracting any sizeable degree of support during the Republican primary process.
Click to expand...
The Bible specifically states that long hair on a man is shameful, it is very doubtful that Jesus had long hair. Unless the apostles just like saying that being like Jesus is shameful....
 
Damocles said:
The Bible specifically states that long hair on a man is shameful, it is very doubtful that Jesus had long hair. Unless the apostles just like saying that being like Jesus is shameful....
Click to expand...

Come off it Damo, next you'll be saying that Jesus wasn't even white.
 
Damocles said:
The Bible specifically states that long hair on a man is shameful, it is very doubtful that Jesus had long hair. Unless the apostles just like saying that being like Jesus is shameful....
Click to expand...

It does? What does it say? Old or new testament?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top