CNN poll: Biden leads Trump in national head-to-head matchup

Phantasmal said:
Lol, yeah I just posted it for you. The Founders created the Electorate because they thought people like you were too stupid to chose the President. I think you’re the one that needs to read the history of voting.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/508310/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nb...d-popular-vote-to-pick-president/2008781/?amp
Click to expand...

So why are you (and news polls) focusing in on what gets dubbed as "popular vote" numbers? Those people aren't electing the president...
 
Survivorman said:
I've read Marianne Williamson, she has been on my radar for years, I was surprised to learn that she was running for the Democrat nomination. She's more suited to being a poet than a politician. I've already said what I think of Biden. Ask yourself this: can either one of them stand up to Trump in a debate? I say no.
Click to expand...

Actually, DT doesn't do very well in debates, either.

I think Williamson would have totally held her own in my view, but that may not have been the case for the massive crowds of shallow people DT attracts.

While I was pleased to hear her message, I do agree she was above her pay grade so to speak in thinking she might prevail.

I would be very impressed if she were given a position in the new Democratic administration. Go ahead. Create that Department of Peace. Let her run that. That sounded like a good idea.

It was difficult to picture her handling an international crisis by telling Mr Putin he needed to be more loving.
 
PoliTalker said:
Actually, DT doesn't do very well in debates, either.

I think Williamson would have totally held her own in my view, but that may not have been the case for the massive crowds of shallow people DT attracts.

While I was pleased to hear her message, I do agree she was above her pay grade so to speak in thinking she might prevail.

I would be very impressed if she were given a position in the new Democratic administration. Go ahead. Create that Department of Peace. Let her run that. That sounded like a good idea.

It was difficult to picture her handling an international crisis by telling Mr Putin he needed to be more loving.
Click to expand...

That is known today as the Department of State.
 
Truth Detector said:
Wrong; you illustrated what an uneducated moron you are. ;) So please explain how Presidential elections have anything to do with the popular vote shit-for-brains.
Click to expand...

tenor.gif
 
PoliTalker said:
Actually, DT doesn't do very well in debates, either.

I think Williamson would have totally held her own in my view, but that may not have been the case for the massive crowds of shallow people DT attracts.

While I was pleased to hear her message, I do agree she was above her pay grade so to speak in thinking she might prevail.

I would be very impressed if she were given a position in the new Democratic administration. Go ahead. Create that Department of Peace. Let her run that. That sounded like a good idea.

It was difficult to picture her handling an international crisis by telling Mr Putin he needed to be more loving.
Click to expand...

No, only well enough to defeat 17 other Republicans and Hillary Clinton for the presidency.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top