I couldn't care less about a statue of anything, put a statue of a pear tree there for all I care.
Got it, so it wouldn't bother you.
I couldn't care less about a statue of anything, put a statue of a pear tree there for all I care.
Doesn't matter. No one notices them anyway and haven't for decades.
Changes nothing, certainly not history.
Makes zero difference. Surely doesn't change anything.Got it, so it wouldn't bother you.
Makes zero difference. Surely doesn't change anything.
You'd like to erase the history books too, like it never happened, but you can't.
Doesn't matter. No one notices them anyway and haven't for decades.
It's tempting to immediately condemn those who illegally pull down confederate statues, but it's important to remember the context of that vandalism. At least in North Carolina, a law at the state level has made it effectively impossible for communities to remove such statues by lawful means. Even if a university is uncomfortable with subjecting its students to a monument to white supremacy, they cannot take it down or even move it to a less prominent place without a change of the law at the state level. Similarly, if a community of color doesn't like having to see a defender of slavery honored in their midst, they cannot protect themselves from that eyesore through legal action at the community or even city level. By denying people in those locales usable legal tools for addressing offensive statues, the state has effectively invited extra-legal action by those communities.
Here's an idea for an alternative. As I understand it, the law was worded such that it only made it illegal to take the statue down or to move it to a less prominent place. If that's right, you could simply cover it up. The left has a lot of really talented artists. So, just have some design structures that can be built around the offensive ones, hiding them completely. That could include practical things like little clock towers or obelisks for posting placards. Or it could be other monuments, designed to fit snugly (and maybe irreversibly) over the offensive ones and to send a very different message.
For example, put up a big pedestal, covering the offensive statue, and on top of that put a statue to John Adams Hyman, the first African American Congress member in North Carolina. Or have it feature statues of several black students, representing the first black students at UNC, following court-ordered desegregation. Then the statue hasn't been brought down or moved, so nothing illegal has happened, but it's been transformed from a celebration of white supremacist treason to a celebration of something positive.
The only historical perspective is that these are monuments to white supremacy and racism. They contain and embody no historical value or significance.
THEY SHOULD ALL BE DESTROYED. All of them. No exceptions.
You think tearing statues down representative of events hundreds of years ago will "make it go away", the mindset of a big blubbering baby.How is tearing down statues to racists and traitors "erasing history"?
Do books not exist?
Telling no one cared until "now".Wrong.
The Silent Sam racist monument on the UNC campus has been the subject of decades of efforts to tear it down. Just because you don't pay attention to things doesn't mean those things don't happen.
Get over yourself.
Telling no one cared until "now".
LOL
No one even knew what they were until some crybaby libs gave them marching orders.
I think it's more than that, or maybe something different then that. It's cultural and heritage. Museums should be their destination.
I like the idea of historical commisions making the decision as to whether to remove/stay or relocate the CSA statues.
I called for a national commission, or state by state a long time ago -it takes it out of the political realm
for ex. there is one in Richmond that honors the service of Robert E, Lee
You think tearing statues down representative of events hundreds of years ago will "make it go away", the mindset of a big blubbering baby.
It changes nothing.
Telling no one cared until "now"
If that were about his service as a president of a college, after the war, I could be OK with it. If it's about his service to a white supremacist rebellion that resulted in the deaths of countless American soldiers, I'd consider that inappropriate. Our troops fought and died beating the Confederacy. It's an insult to them for the man responsible for so many of their deaths to be honored. It's also a little weird to honor someone for getting his army's ass kicked that way.
I think this is a great compromise.
It's tempting to immediately condemn those who illegally pull down confederate statues, but it's important to remember the context of that vandalism. At least in North Carolina, a law at the state level has made it effectively impossible for communities to remove such statues by lawful means. Even if a university is uncomfortable with subjecting its students to a monument to white supremacy, they cannot take it down or even move it to a less prominent place without a change of the law at the state level. Similarly, if a community of color doesn't like having to see a defender of slavery honored in their midst, they cannot protect themselves from that eyesore through legal action at the community or even city level. By denying people in those locales usable legal tools for addressing offensive statues, the state has effectively invited extra-legal action by those communities.
Here's an idea for an alternative. As I understand it, the law was worded such that it only made it illegal to take the statue down or to move it to a less prominent place. If that's right, you could simply cover it up. The left has a lot of really talented artists. So, just have some design structures that can be built around the offensive ones, hiding them completely. That could include practical things like little clock towers or obelisks for posting placards. Or it could be other monuments, designed to fit snugly (and maybe irreversibly) over the offensive ones and to send a very different message.
For example, put up a big pedestal, covering the offensive statue, and on top of that put a statue to John Adams Hyman, the first African American Congress member in North Carolina. Or have it feature statues of several black students, representing the first black students at UNC, following court-ordered desegregation. Then the statue hasn't been brought down or moved, so nothing illegal has happened, but it's been transformed from a celebration of white supremacist treason to a celebration of something positive.