Connecticut To Give Its Electoral College Votes To National Popular Vote Victor

evince said:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/democracy



Definition of democracy
plural democracies
1
a : government by the people; especially : rule of the majority
b : a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections
2
: a political unit that has a democratic government
3
capitalized : the principles and policies of the Democratic party in the U.S.
from emancipation Republicanism to New Deal Democracy —C. M. Roberts
Click to expand...


your argument isn't with me

its with all the dictionaries and encyclopedias in the world
 
aloysious said:
Not only are you seriously mentally ill but you're stoopid and lazy. It's not hard.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...electoral-college_us_5af025c0e4b041fd2d287c79
That's from the OP.

https://www.270towin.com/2004_Election/
That's the result from googling "2004 electoral map. Jeez. Then you have to some simple arithmetic. I don't think you can handle that part.
Click to expand...

you need to provide sources for what you claim


its your job not mine asshole


I always provide sources for facts I claim
 
aloysious said:
In 2004 Bush woulda got 169 more electoral votes than the 286 he received and Kerry 169 less had these laws been in effect.
Wow, that woulda been Bush with 455 to Kerry's 82 (I think).
TDS really fucks up liberals' thought processes.
Click to expand...

now with those sources prove this point is real
 
aloysious said:
In 2004 Bush woulda got 169 more electoral votes than the 286 he received and Kerry 169 less had these laws been in effect.
Wow, that woulda been Bush with 455 to Kerry's 82 (I think).
TDS really fucks up liberals' thought processes.
Click to expand...

post 130
 
floridaFOOL said:
Connecticut’s legislature has passed a bill that would give the state’s Electoral College votes to the presidential candidate who wins the popular vote nationally.

The state Senate voted 21-14 on Saturday to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which includes 10 states and the District of Columbia. The state House passed the measure last week, 77 to 73.
The compact requires its members to cast their Electoral College ballots for the presidential candidate who wins the national popular vote. The agreement goes into effect once states representing at least 270 electoral votes — the number needed for a candidate to win the presidency — signs the compact.

Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy (D) has promised to sign the legislation committing his state to the interstate agreement. Once he does so, the compact will have 172 electoral votes. California, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia have already signed the accord.

Malloy has described the current Electoral College voting system as “fundamentally unfair.”

“With the exception of the presidency, every elected office in the country, from city council, to United States senator, to governor, is awarded the candidate who receives the most votes,” the governor said, according to the Connecticut Mirror.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...electoral-college_us_5af025c0e4b041fd2d287c79
Click to expand...

Another Democratic dumbfuck who is too ignorant to comprehend what the Constitution is all about. But alas, he is also a dishonest asshat who doesn't care about the will of the people, but rather, the will of the Democratic Party of the Jackass.

That said, the Republican Party will not miss the seven electoral votes usually going to the Democratic party of the Jackass anyway. :rofl2:

Can you imagine the outrage lying leftist Fascists would exhibit if Republican legislatures started fabricating their own version of how the Constitutional electoral requirements are supposed to work?
 
Last edited:
SmarterthanYou said:
just another step towards civil war that the left is trying to instigate. watch what happens when the 'fly over' states get ignored. it will be beautifully bloody.
Click to expand...

I would call it a Constitutional crisis. But you have to understand that the lying leftist Fascists don't care if they further divide this nation; it's all about their Fascist power grabbing. After all, they lost an election that was supposed to divine the Presidency to the unethical, unaccomplished lying harpy Clinton.

Remember this:

Will you accept the outcome of the election? Clinton and Trump answer

Liberals really are that stupid and repugnant.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
???.....why not......nobody will have to campaign in the states who ignore their voters.....they will just have to campaign in a few high population states......
Click to expand...

floridaFOOL said:
Isn't that just what is done right now, festus?
Click to expand...

:lolup: The stupidity, ignorance and dishonesty of this asshat are hard to surpass.

giphy.gif
 
Eagle Eye said:
Typical a system that has worked well for over 240 years isn't good enough for the liberal snow flakes. This is nothing but a blatant attempt by the left to circumvent the Constitution. Any bets this will be found unconstitutional if it is ever tried?
Click to expand...

I believe that it would go to the Supreme Court. It is definitely and attempt to usurp the will of the people and the Constitution by attempting to guarantee a member of the Democratic Party of the Jackass winning elections without the need to even campaign.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top