Corroboration is not required?? Seriously??

Althea said:
It wasn't a criminal investigation. It was a background check with scores of witnesses that wanted to tell the FBI what they witnessed when the dry drunk was still in college.
Click to expand...
There was nothing to investigate...
 
Guille said:
Yes, she did have a duty, or responsibility if you like, to at least warn the public of the presence of a man she believed to be into sexually assaulting women. If she truly believed Kavanaugh was a rapist and said nothing and allowed him to continue to prey on unsuspecting women then she's a failure as a Citizen.

And yes, I know she didn't actually accuse Kavanaugh of rape but she strongly implied she would have been raped had the assault not been broken up.
Click to expand...
...or "death" might have occurred....so, if it did indeed take place, even more reason to report it...
 
Althea said:
Of course they did. Don't believe everything you read in tweets.
Click to expand...
They did not "refuse"....but if you have a link where the FBI was actually blocked from investigating someone they felt would have been helpful to the check, let me know. I'll read it...
 
TOP said:
They did not "refuse"....but if you have a link where the FBI was actually blocked from investigating someone they felt would have been helpful to the check, let me know. I'll read it...
Click to expand...
FBI director testified before Congress yesterday. Maybe it's time for you to change the channel?
 
Althea said:
FBI director testified before Congress yesterday. Maybe it's time for you to change the channel?
Click to expand...
OK...link? Where they were denied the ability to interview. I'm not changing the Food Network or the Big Ten Channel...and our local news didn't mention his testimony...
 
You should know the meaning of civic duty before responding to the post. Now you look like a fool.
“Civic Duty” refers to actions required by law.
I believe you refer to her civic responsibilities.

I know she never claimed having a strong case. Based on what the media and what she has provided I said she doesn’t have a strong case.
I have been involved in the court process for 35 years.
If you don’t have a strong case you don’t make allegations. She made the allegations for political reasons only.

Idiot it wasn’t just the two alleged attackers. She testified to others being there including life long friend.
This incident was so traumatic no one could recall anything she testified to.
She couldn’t recall who drove her home.
After the incident no one said “what’s wrong”. Did she leave immediately or stay at the party.

Genius.
Based on the information presented to the public (her testimony, letter to the Post, etc.) what supporting evidence has been presented to anything she has made public. Self serving allegations are not supporting evidence. If you can’t realize that by now your a lost cause.
 
TOP said:
But she did not want to go public when she decided it was her civic duty. How was that supposed to work?
What did she "expect"?
Click to expand...

What the hell are you talking about?

A majority of women who are assaulted feel it is better to just shut up about it...mostly because disgusting turds like you will act toward them the way you do.

She spoke up when SHE decided it was time to do so...when SHE decided it was her civic duty to do so.

And she did so reluctantly...FOR GOOD REASON.
 
Stargazer said:
There was nothing to investigate. Everyone she claimed was there (she didn't know where) said it never happened.
Click to expand...

No...they did not.

Kavanaugh said it didn't happen.

Judge MAY have said it didn't happen.

No one else said it didn't happen except those two.

SHE certainly did not say it didn't happen. In fact she insisted it DID HAPPEN.

Her friend said she did not see it happen. But...she was not in that room.
 
Guille said:
Yes, she did have a duty, or responsibility if you like, to at least warn the public of the presence of a man she believed to be into sexually assaulting women.
Click to expand...

SHE HAD NO OBLIGATION WHATSOEVER to report the incident at that time.

It appears that most women do not report assaults...because of what they will get from assholes like you.



If she truly believed Kavanaugh was a rapist and said nothing and allowed him to continue to prey on unsuspecting women then she's a failure as a Citizen.
Click to expand...

YOU are a failure as a citizen, Guille...and as a human.

That is allowed.

Under any circumstances, SHE HAD NO OBLIGATION WHATSOEVER to report the incident at that time.

And yes, I know she didn't actually accuse Kavanaugh of rape but she strongly implied she would have been raped had the assault not been broken up.
Click to expand...

Thank you for agreeing with the obvious...namely that she did not accuse Kavanaugh of raping her.
 
TOP said:
...or "death" might have occurred....so, if it did indeed take place, even more reason to report it...
Click to expand...

She had no obligation to report it.

It appears as though MOST WOMEN would not have reported it...in large part because of the reactions of assholes like you.
 
TOP said:
They did not "refuse"....but if you have a link where the FBI was actually blocked from investigating someone they felt would have been helpful to the check, let me know. I'll read it...
Click to expand...

They did not do a thorough investigation.

They did not interview Ford.

And they did not interview Kavanaugh.

Lucky for Kavanaugh, because he would not have been able to evade actually answering questions like he did with the committee.
 
Tkaffen said:
You should know the meaning of civic duty before responding to the post. Now you look like a fool.
“Civic Duty” refers to actions required by law.
I believe you refer to her civic responsibilities.

I know she never claimed having a strong case. Based on what the media and what she has provided I said she doesn’t have a strong case.
I have been involved in the court process for 35 years.
If you don’t have a strong case you don’t make allegations. She made the allegations for political reasons only.

Idiot it wasn’t just the two alleged attackers. She testified to others being there including life long friend.
This incident was so traumatic no one could recall anything she testified to.
She couldn’t recall who drove her home.
After the incident no one said “what’s wrong”. Did she leave immediately or stay at the party.

Genius.
Based on the information presented to the public (her testimony, letter to the Post, etc.) what supporting evidence has been presented to anything she has made public. Self serving allegations are not supporting evidence. If you can’t realize that by now your a lost cause.
Click to expand...

She felt it was her civic duty to tell the truth about a nominee for the SCOTUS.

Keep on digging. You deserve it.
 
Frank Apisa said:
THAT HAS BEEN EXPLAINED DOZENS UPON DOZENS OF TIME.

NOT SHOUTING.

JUST WANT FOR YOU FINALLY TO GET THE MESSAGE.
Click to expand...

Frank......

giphy.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top