Corroboration is not required?? Seriously??

Tkaffen said:
Nordick
Do you have a source in the FBI.
If many people wanted to speak why did they go to the Times or Post. They will write any bull shit story that walks in the door.

Kavanaugh could be a twin of the drunken womanizer murderer Teddy Kennedy but his habits are irrelevant to this allegation.
Let’s just say Ford alleged she was abused August 30 thirty six years ago.
Let’s say Kavanaugh got drunk every day from August 1 to August 29. It’s immaterial and potential inadmissible in criminal court what Kavanaugh had to drink days prior to the alleged date of this incident.
What is material is the evidence let me repeat that “evidence” that can be proven by the state/plaintiff against the defendant. What evidence did the plaintiff have to support her allegations— nothing.
In civil and criminal court it’s all about the evidence. What can the plaintiff prove against the defendant.

Nordick. You shouldn’t have dropped out of law school. Your hopelessly stupid. No more legal advice from me unless you want to pay me $250.00 an hour.

What you can do is write your senators and request they proceed with removing Kavanaugh from office. Good luck with that.
I will give you one more lesson. You do know there are 8 others on the Supreme Court. There are four others the media alleges leans right. Will you try and find high school dirt on these others.
Also don’t think Kavanaugh leans far right. He doesn’t.
You can have all the unprotected sex you want. A majority of the court will never overturn Roe v Wade.

If Ford has such a strong case she can file a civil action against Kavanaugh. The burden of proof is preponderance of the evidence. Good luck with that. Paula Jones collected over 800K in a civil action against that lying asshole Clinton. Remember he was disbarred after committing perjury.
Click to expand...

She does not have a "strong case" you asshole.

She never claimed she did.

She says she suffered an ordeal at the hands of Kavanaugh (and his sidekick, Judge)...and has pretty much kept it to herself...not intending to bring it forth or try to make money on it.

The case cannot be "very strong" BECAUSE THE ONLY PEOPLE THERE WERE FORD...AND THE TWO ASSHOLES ATTACKING HER.

But she felt it her civic duty to come forward because Kavanaugh was being considered for the SCOTUS.

(I realize you may not understand the term "civic duty"...so please look it up. Do not be embarrassed if you do not know. It is an important concept that most American conservatives do not know.}
 
There's absolutely no proof that the "incident (ordeal)", as Mrs. food relates it, happened....*I have never understood how she might think that such an accusation, without any facts, was going to make a difference (unless what happened was the "goal").... To say that it was her "Civic duty" is just absurd..
Obeying the law, jury duty, paying taxes, voting....since you mentioned "definition"....
 
Last edited:
Would it be my "civic duty" to report a few liberals who undoubtedly have mental disorders to their Dr. and suggest they should have their driver's licenses revoked if they're being considered for a school bus driver's position? I mean, holy hell, it's "for the children," right?
 
TOP said:
There's absolutely no proof that the "incident (ordeal)", as Mrs. food relates it, happened....
Click to expand...

Well...thank you for agreeing with me. There is absolutely no "proof" that it happened. IF it did happen...only the three people were there...and two of them have a reason to say that it did not happen.

Jeez.




*I have never understood how she might think that such an accusation, without any facts, was going to make a difference (unless what happened was the "goal")....
Click to expand...

I read all your posts, TOP...and I CAN understand how YOU CANNOT understand almost anything.

You are not very bright to begin with...and your perceptions are clouded by your desire not to see what you do not want to see.

There is a cure: Grow up.


To say that it was her "Civic duty" is just absurd..
Click to expand...

To say that saying it is absurd...IS ABSURD.

If she considered it her civic duty to come forth...it was her civic duty.

Are you ABLE to think?


Obeying the law, jury duty, paying taxes, voting....since you mentioned "definition"....
Click to expand...

That is one of the worst sentence fragments I've seen in this forum...and I have seen all sorts of sentence fragments.

Were you actually meaning to say something there?
 
RB 60 said:
Would it be my "civic duty" to report a few liberals who undoubtedly have mental disorders to their Dr. and suggest they should have their driver's licenses revoked if they're being considered for a school bus driver's position? I mean, holy hell, it's "for the children," right?
Click to expand...

I think it would not be your civic duty...but that is not the test that ought to apply.

IF YOU THINK IT IS...do it.

Maybe you ought to wait until later in the day to post, RB. Your early morning posts are really ill-conceived...and extremely contrived.
 
Frank, I am not conducting a test. I'm asking if that would also be considered my "civic duty." Wouldn't a mentally challenged liberal (and a few here clearly are) holding a driver's license be both a danger to children and the general driving public? What about owning a firearm?
 
Flash said:
Sometimes it never happened:

Tawana Brawley rape
Duke La Crosse rape
Rolling Stone University of Virginia fraternity rape
California child care workers

Everybody believed the accused was guilty until the accuser turned out to be lying.

In the Rolling Stone case people argued that those kinds of sexual assaults do occur so although that particular event did not occur it was ok to write about them.
Click to expand...
These liars should have to do jail time.

I pegged Ford as a liar from day one. It was so obvious she was a paid liar.
 
TOP said:
There's absolutely no proof that the "incident (ordeal)", as Mrs. food relates it, happened....*I have never understood how she might think that such an accusation, without any facts, was going to make a difference (unless what happened was the "goal").... To say that it was her "Civic duty" is just absurd..
Obeying the law, jury duty, paying taxes, voting....since you mentioned "definition"....
Click to expand...

Of course he chose to make fun of the part where you pwn'ed his ass instead of addressing it. lol.

Ford had an obligation to at least report the incident at the time. Coming forward 36 years later was not her choosing to do her "civic duty", it was Ford failing as a Citizen.
 
Frank Apisa said:
Well...thank you for agreeing with me. There is absolutely no "proof" that it happened. IF it did happen...only the three people were there...and two of them have a reason to say that it did not happen.

Jeez.






I read all your posts, TOP...and I CAN understand how YOU CANNOT understand almost anything.

You are not very bright to begin with...and your perceptions are clouded by your desire not to see what you do not want to see.

There is a cure: Grow up.




To say that saying it is absurd...IS ABSURD.

If she considered it her civic duty to come forth...it was her civic duty.

Are you ABLE to think?




That is one of the worst sentence fragments I've seen in this forum...and I have seen all sorts of sentence fragments.

Were you actually meaning to say something there?
Click to expand...
I was so hoping for a reasonable adult response...but....
I'll try again in a day or two ....
I do imagine that we can agree on one thing, though. That Mrs. Ford gets the help she so desperately needs...
 
RB 60 said:
Frank, I am not conducting a test.
Click to expand...

The "test" RB...is whether or not you should report what you consider "mentally challenged" people to their doctors.

You were asking me. I told you YOU must determine YOUR civic duty.

i'm asking if that would also be considered my "civic duty."
Click to expand...

Hello!!!

I realize that.

My response acknowledged that.

(Really...think about not posting so early!)


Wouldn't a mentally challenged liberal (and a few here clearly are) holding a driver's license be both a danger to children and the general driving public? What about owning a firearm?
Click to expand...

If YOU think they would be such a danger...report them.

Should be interesting!

I'd love to see the expressions on the faces of those to whom you report it...if you do.
 
Stargazer said:
These liars should have to do jail time.

I pegged Ford as a liar from day one. It was so obvious she was a paid liar.
Click to expand...

I pegged you for an idiot, actually a useful idiot for your puppet masters, the first time I read anything you posted.

You have confirmed my initial impression many times since.
 
Guille said:
Of course he chose to make fun of the part where you pwn'ed his ass instead of addressing it. lol.

Ford had an obligation to at least report the incident at the time. Coming forward 36 years later was not her choosing to do her "civic duty", it was Ford failing as a Citizen.
Click to expand...

Ford had no OBLIGATION to report the incident at that time.

NONE WHATSOEVER.

When she realized Kavanaugh was being considered for the SCOTUS...SHE determined that it was her civic duty to report it NOW.

Stop being stupid...if you can.
 
TOP said:
I was so hoping for a reasonable adult response...
Click to expand...

I doubt that...and my guess is that MANY people here who follow your posts doubt it also.

You are a troll.

Not an especially effective one...but a troll nonetheless.

but....
I'll try again in a day or two ....
I do imagine that we can agree on one thing, though. That Mrs. Ford gets the help she so desperately needs...
Click to expand...

If you change that from "Mrs. Ford" to hopes that YOU get the help you so desperately needs...WE CAN AGREE.
 
Frank Apisa said:
Ford had no OBLIGATION to report the incident at that time.

NONE WHATSOEVER.

When she realized Kavanaugh was being considered for the SCOTUS...SHE determined that it was her civic duty to report it NOW.

Stop being stupid...if you can.
Click to expand...
But she did not want to go public when she decided it was her civic duty. How was that supposed to work?
What did she "expect"?
 
Frank Apisa said:
Ford had no OBLIGATION to report the incident at that time.

NONE WHATSOEVER.

When she realized Kavanaugh was being considered for the SCOTUS...SHE determined that it was her civic duty to report it NOW.

Stop being stupid...if you can.
Click to expand...

Yes, she did have a duty, or responsibility if you like, to at least warn the public of the presence of a man she believed to be into sexually assaulting women. If she truly believed Kavanaugh was a rapist and said nothing and allowed him to continue to prey on unsuspecting women then she's a failure as a Citizen.

And yes, I know she didn't actually accuse Kavanaugh of rape but she strongly implied she would have been raped had the assault not been broken up.
 
Stargazer said:
There was nothing to investigate. Everyone she claimed was there (she didn't know where) said it never happened.
Click to expand...
It wasn't a criminal investigation. It was a background check with scores of witnesses that wanted to tell the FBI what they witnessed when the dry drunk was still in college.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top