Very little conservative about Donald Trump
Because my point (which I stated clearly in the post) was that conservatives favored state action on gay marriage and they used states to define marriage as they favored. A state has to have some laws regulating marriage and they have a more limited view than liberals.
It is not the person that is the true conservative, it is the policy
You don't like hypotheticals because you know you can't make them fit your explanations of what is liberal and conservative.
Yet, you fail to answer whether Obama and Hillary were conservative when they opposed gay marriage.
A Conservative one. Because who still opposes it? Conservatives.
Conservatives favor policies protecting life which they like; so, they are using government regulation supporting life. They are willing to use regulation to support things they see as important.
Or people voting.
Or the ACA.
This is a "big lie" on par with "Trump won the election."
Republicans are "pro life" right up until people are born. They oppose embryonic stem cell research that would save lives. They oppose welfare and early childhood education. They oppose universal healthcare. They support wars of choice. They oppose amnesty for immigrants facing murder back home.
You all care NOTHING for life. You care only for embryos.
"You all"? You are making erroneous assumptions. I was trying to explain the conservative position. I never said I supported it.
You agree being anti-abortion is a conservative position? That was my only point.
Because they don't favor government taking care of all those people after birth is a separate issue.
Flash, what annoys me about you more than anything is that you shit forth bullshit opinions, that you spent no time developing, as if they were objective facts.
Oh, Please. You are such a hypocrite. You claim I am too lazy to research topics yet I have proven you wrong on so many factual issues I have lost count.
--Drumpf was going to cancel the election (before it occurred)
--the stimulus check had to be repaid
--that some primaries are automatically cancelled if they have no competition
--that Americans can assault or kill people in a Nazi uniform because they are a threat
--that the U. S. can ban a Confederate flag or Swastika
You base you opinion on emotion.
If the facts don't fit your emotion, you become hostile and begin with personal insults and ad hominem attacks like a juvenile.
Try to be a big boy and stick to actual political debate.
Because somebody disagrees with you does not mean they are an evil person.
Because you are a liberal does not make you smarter, more moral, or right about everything.
And, it certainly does not mean you did a better job of researching your topic.
"You all"? You are making erroneous assumptions. I was trying to explain the conservative position. I never said I supported it.
You agree being anti-abortion is a conservative position? That was my only point.
Because they don't favor government taking care of all those people after birth is a separate issue.
Lol only a conservative would say that. A govt that demands that all women carry children to term and then refuses to help people pay for raising those children is totalitarian, not conservative. Although I'm beginning to think they're the same thing as applied by your conservative "friends."
Nothing conservative about tariffs, increased spending, deficits, and debt, government regulations on prices, increased government power using emergency powers and executive orders...
Only a kneejerk liberal would fail to recognize sarcasm.
You also obviously do not understand the term totalitarian.
Yes, you can do this and not face any jailtime. Self-defense and stand your ground.
Yes, they can, and they have. The military just did it last year. NC did it this week on their license plates.
Ummm...where have you been the last 50 years?
Because all of that shit is Movement Conservatism.
All of it.
Nixon, Reagan, Bush the Elder, Bush the Dumber, Trump...all of them did all of those things.
I'm glad your long hours of preparation only to reach false conclusions have been corrected about the previous issues.
But, you still fail to understand free speech.
Unless the guy in the Nazi uniform is going to harm you or take your life
A person simply wearing a Nazi uniform, Klan hood, white supremacy badge, BLM or Antifa outfit cannot be (illegally) threatening without threatening actions.
I explained this to you before with supporting court cases.
Again, you misunderstand free speech law.
A person doesn't have the same free speech rights on a military base for obvious reasons.
It cannot be banned in most other place.
NC cannot ban the Confederate flag in that state
But, that does not mean the state has to convey that symbol on its license plates.
Only fascists would want to restrict uniforms, flags, or any other form of political expression.
But none of those policies fits conservative ideology.
What Republicans say to attract voters and the policies they pass are two different things.
I'm sure we will hear many liberals disappointed in Biden's actions because they don't think he is adhering to liberal ideology.
Stand your ground and self-defense are legitimate against Nazis.
Is it that I don't understand it, or is it that you've established post-hoc standards for it?
Because it kinda feels like the latter, since that's your pattern and habit.
You submit your sloppy, rushed, subjective judgment as some kind of objective standard.
That is inherent in Nazis, though. So, no matter what, putting that uniform on is an act of aggression and intimidation. I won't be intimidated.
Sure they can because of the inherent violence those things all represent. They are simultaneously a call to action and a threat. The law is actually quite clear on that. You can't wear a shirt in public that says "kill all white people" because that is technically incitement. Which isn't protected speech.
So if you're wearing a Nazi uniform, the sole message you are sending is that you seek to exterminate people, which is inherently a violent threat. Because that is inherent to Nazism, isn't it?
No, you really actually didn't do that. What you did was bring up tangential cases, but none of them actually supported your claim that Nazis aren't an inherent threat.
No, Flash, you keep changing the standard whenever it becomes inconvenient for you, and then you say I don't understand the law when it's you who keeps changing what you think the law means.
You're not consistent because you're too lazy and sloppy to know what you're talking about.But you think you're entitled to this opinion, which -I'm sorry to say- you're not.
Again, not my opinion. This is established constitutional law which you are apparently too lazy to learn about even after I have explained it to you. Luckily, the country allows much greater freedom of expression than liberal fascists would like.
You are arguing from a position of ignorance. You are arguing against constitutional law and attribute those opinions to me. And it is very hypocritical to accuse me of being sloppy when you are the one making up stuff and I am just citing established law.
Why not? It's literally government property, so the 1A should be way more applicable there.
Security concerns. Same thing applies to protests and demonstrations.
In fact, that behavior really just reinforces my belief that you're a total piece of shit.
Your argument is with the federal courts, not me. Rather than spending your time calling me lazy do some reading and inform yourself about free expression.
Well, they banned it on license plates, so....What about free speech, Flash? Are license plates not subject to free speech? And if not, then is free speech not absolute?
See, these are the questions you should have asked yourself before going down this path.
My free speech does not mean you have to allow me to convey that speech on your lawn, car, license plate, etc. Use some logic.
No, free speech is not absolute. But that involves types of speech, not where I choose to express it.
You are making this up as you go along. Try reading.