Court rejects 'Roe v. Wade for Men'

LOL

Yeah, sure.

You have no idea what you are talking about, because the men I have in mind were not liberals.

Yeah, I'm sure living in Liberal Manhattan, you've just met a ton of Conservative guys there.
:rolleyes:

Come on Darla, get real, I live in the Conservative country, single mothers are virtually unheard of out here. I've also lived in the inner city where very few fathers stick around.
I know you hate Conservatives and undoubtedly you loathe this or that one that you heard on the news who abandoned his wife or whatever, but the reason that shit makes the news is BECAUSE it is unusual, the norm of the millions of leftwing couples in inner cities where the father jets, would never make the news because we all know it to happen and it's not really anything newsworthy.

You got to start basing your viewpoint on real life and not life as you see it through the prism of leftwing news outlets.
 
Yeah, I'm sure living in Liberal Manhattan, you've just met a ton of Conservative guys there.
:rolleyes:

Come on Darla, get real, I live in the Conservative country, single mothers are virtually unheard of out here. I've also lived in the inner city where very few fathers stick around.
I know you hate Conservatives and undoubtedly you loathe this or that one that you heard on the news who abandoned his wife or whatever, but the reason that shit makes the news is BECAUSE it is unusual, the norm of the millions of leftwing couples in inner cities where the father jets, would never make the news because we all know it to happen and it's not really anything newsworthy.

You got to start basing your viewpoint on real life and not life as you see it through the prism of leftwing news outlets.

I live in REAL conservative country. My neighbor is a single mother. Many of the people I go to college with are single mothers.
 
I live in REAL conservative country. My neighbor is a single mother. Many of the people I go to college with are single mothers.

I did say virtually unheard of, as I recall you lived in a less Conservative area in the southern part of Mississippi anyway.

Here are the stats, as chart 5 clearly shows, the amount of single mothers in cities is easily the highest and in the Liberal northeast, higher still yet again then any other area in America:

"For five cities—Baltimore,
Cleveland, Newark, Rochester, and Detroit—the portion
of families made up of single mothers was 30
percent or above in 2000, with Detroit having the
highest rate (35%)."
http://www.fraud-insurance.net/Comp/BeforeAfterWelfReformUs.pdf

Oh gee what a surprise, the most Liberal voting city in America - Detroit, has the highest single mother rate.
 
I did say virtually unheard of, as I recall you lived in a less Conservative area in the southern part of Mississippi anyway.

Here are the stats, as chart 5 clearly shows, the amount of single mothers in cities is easily the highest and in the Liberal northeast, higher still yet again then any other area in America:

"For five cities—Baltimore,
Cleveland, Newark, Rochester, and Detroit—the portion
of families made up of single mothers was 30
percent or above in 2000, with Detroit having the
highest rate (35%)."
http://www.fraud-insurance.net/Comp/BeforeAfterWelfReformUs.pdf

Oh gee what a surprise, the most Liberal voting city in America - Detroit, has the highest single mother rate.

Well statistically there are more people in large cities so there will be more of everything. I know of many single mothers in my rural area....
 
LOL. Don't take this as criticism, it isn't. This post just made me think of Ralph Wiggums on The Simpsons..


"Me fail English! That's unpossible!"
Skinner: "Chewie, Han Solo, all my favorites are here! Ralph Wiggum wins for best diorama!"
Ralph: "What's a diorama?"
 
I love nothing more than when a bunch of men get themselves all hopped on righteousness and start yammering.

When it comes to this subject matter, there is no such thing as a conservative man or a liberal man; there are just men.

If a married man ends up with a pregnant girlfriend (and if you think conservative men who are married don’t f around you haven’t been reading the papers), and he perceives that he has a lot to lose; his children, his home, his very financial security, he will move to protect these things. The best way to do so is an abortion and he will pressure his girlfriend to have one, often by promising to leave his wife when the time is right, and then they can have babies together. If the girlfriend refuses to have the abortion she becomes what we call an inconvenient woman. Inconvenient women sometimes end up dead. The number one cause of death among pregnant women is murder.

Of course there is the anomalous man who wants to have the baby but the woman refuses, he is statistically insignificant and I always find it amusing how conservative men pretend that the far more common woman who wants her baby but is pressured into an abortion does not exist, as he writes reams about the poor man who is hanging onto his girlfriend’s leg, pleading with her to please not abort it, he’ll take care of it, please! It is uncommonly amusing.

And almost as amusing is the liberal man who pretends that liberal guys are interested in the woman’s right to choose when he knocks up an inconvenient woman, when in truth he is also often most interested in solving his problem, and it just so happens that in his case pushing for the abortion does not have the added annoyance of hypocrisy; he has not been preaching that abortion is murder.

Stop guys, I’m at work and you’re killing me. And I thought 30 Rock was funny.
 
I love nothing more than when a bunch of men get themselves all hopped on righteousness and start yammering.

When it comes to this subject matter, there is no such thing as a conservative man or a liberal man; there are just men.

If a married man ends up with a pregnant girlfriend (and if you think conservative men who are married don’t f around you haven’t been reading the papers), and he perceives that he has a lot to lose; his children, his home, his very financial security, he will move to protect these things. The best way to do so is an abortion and he will pressure his girlfriend to have one, often by promising to leave his wife when the time is right, and then they can have babies together. If the girlfriend refuses to have the abortion she becomes what we call an inconvenient woman. Inconvenient women sometimes end up dead. The number one cause of death among pregnant women is murder.

Of course there is the anomalous man who wants to have the baby but the woman refuses, he is statistically insignificant and I always find it amusing how conservative men pretend that the far more common woman who wants her baby but is pressured into an abortion does not exist, as he writes reams about the poor man who is hanging onto his girlfriend’s leg, pleading with her to please not abort it, he’ll take care of it, please! It is uncommonly amusing.

And almost as amusing is the liberal man who pretends that liberal guys are interested in the woman’s right to choose when he knocks up an inconvenient woman, when in truth he is also often most interested in solving his problem, and it just so happens that in his case pushing for the abortion does not have the added annoyance of hypocrisy; he has not been preaching that abortion is murder.

Stop guys, I’m at work and you’re killing me. And I thought 30 Rock was funny.

Wow... you are so very blantantly sexist in your views on men.
 
Wow... you are so very blantantly sexist in your views on men.

Take a look at what this country is spending trying to collect child support payments. Men don’t want to take care of the kids they already have, to claim they are, generally, clamoring for more, is stupid, false, and flies in the face of all known facts.
It is not sexist to point that out. Try and start dealing with reality and stop throwing around political buzzwords SF.
 
Take a look at what this country is spending trying to collect child support payments. Men don’t want to take care of the kids they already have, to claim they are, generally, clamoring for more, is stupid, false, and flies in the face of all known facts.
It is not sexist to point that out. Try and start dealing with reality and stop throwing around political buzzwords SF.

STRAWMAN ALERT

My sisters ex is over $30k behind in child support, so I know quite well that there are men out there that try to shirk their responsibilities.

But for you to say something as blatantly stupid as...."Men don’t want to take care of the kids they already have, to claim they are, generally, clamoring for more, is stupid, false, and flies in the face of all known facts."

No one said men were "clamoring" for more kids. But there are millions of men who do take very good care of thier kids. To act as though men don't do so is blatantly sexist of you and quite ignorant.

Speaking of reality, how about you join it?
 
Back
Top