PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
What? Are you saying now that it is a part of the theory of evolution or that it's only my theory?
absolutely I am denying it is part of the scientific evidence of evolution.....
What? Are you saying now that it is a part of the theory of evolution or that it's only my theory?
does not fit with the evidence of the fossil record.
Baxter and those like him also don't seem to understand that evolution normally works to fill a void.
absolutely I am denying it is part of the scientific evidence of evolution.....
sure it does.....the fossil record provides us with evidence of all the creatures God created.....
then they aren't done....there are still lots of voids in Baxter's Theory of Evolution and Refrigerator Maintenance.......
You seem to have avoided this question, Baxter.
I wonder why that is.
Since this seems to be based on Noah's world being flooded, how big do you think Noah's world was?
When was this question asked?
A localized flood is clearly not what is claimed by the bible. All flesh.... face of the earth.... the covenant that never again would the lord flood the world as he had. It clearly intends a worldwide flood or it's still in error, since we have had many localized floods.
How big is God's world?
Since this seems to be based on Noah's world being flooded, how big do you think Noah's world was?
Common descent is part of the accepted theory. You deny it based on nothing but the fact that it disagrees with your book of fairytales and offer no clear alternative.
No, it does not fit with creation.
THE theory of evolution. The only one creating "new and imaginative" hypothesis seems to be you cultist.
It is part of Your Accepted Theory......I deny it because unlike what is actually demonstrated about evolution through scientific study, it carries no evidence......
sure it does.....the fossil record provides us with evidence of all the creatures God created.....
can you show a scientific experiment which demonstrates this?......
There is evidence, the fossil record and genetic similarities.
It shows evidence of evolution, change in life. There is no evidence of creation.
Common descent is part of the accepted theory.
You are the one suggesting an alternative hypothesis that does not fit the available data. Where is your evidence?
So your purpose isn't to convince him of anything; but instead is just you finding a way to spend your time.
And you appear to be the only one "pissing and moaning"; which is prevalent with your swearing and name calling.![]()