Creationist child abusers close doors

monty1 said:
You're right, and that's what I've been saying about Baxter all along. He's the abusive one trying to prove something to soothe his ego.
Click to expand...

Did you pay attention how he ran away from the possible discussion, regarding how big he thought Noah's world was; seeing as how the Bible speaks of Noah's world being flooded?
I wonder why he's so scared to discuss this? :palm:
 
patriot66 said:
Job 40:15 - 40:24

Now viewing scripture range from the book of Job chapter 40:15 through chapter 40:24...


Job Chapter 40

15 Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox.

16 Lo now, his strength [is] in his loins, and his force [is] in the navel of his belly.

17 He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together.

18 His bones [are as] strong pieces of brass; his bones [are] like bars of iron.

19 He [is] the chief of the ways of God: he that made him can make his sword to approach [unto him].

20 Surely the mountains bring him forth food, where all the beasts of the field play.

21 He lieth under the shady trees, in the covert of the reed, and fens.

22 The shady trees cover him [with] their shadow; the willows of the brook compass him about.

23 Behold, he drinketh up a river, [and] hasteth not: he trusteth that he can draw up Jordan into his mouth.

24 He taketh it with his eyes: [his] nose pierceth through snares

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible here is your old earth theory shot down

http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-answers/features/worldwide-flood-evidence and the flood that really happened
Click to expand...

You may choose to believe the Bible is a book of facts but it's actually a book of stories and personal accounts.

Unless you can prove these stories, they are not facts. When a science book is written, the information in it is supported by facts and evidence and the process nused to prove it.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
two static fossils do not give evidence of evolution.....they only give evidence of existence......it is your fantasy that there is a connection between them......
Click to expand...

The fossil record is only one type of evidence for evolution and the facts that your world view cannot explain. It's enough alone to destroy your fairy tales and very strong basis for supporting evolution.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
if acceptance creates evidence, what of the fact that only 15% of people believe that humans evolved without the hand of God being involved?........doesn't that make creation the "accepted theory"?.......
Click to expand...

Strawman. I did not say acceptance creates evidence. You continue to claim that my statements diverge from the commonly accepted theory. I poijted out that it does not in any way. You have failed to make your case and are again trying to change the subject. It is you that rejects the commonly accepted theory of evolution because it upsets your emotional investment in fairy tales.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Did you pay attention how he ran away from the possible discussion, regarding how big he thought Noah's world was; seeing as how the Bible speaks of Noah's world being flooded?
I wonder why he's so scared to discuss this? :palm:
Click to expand...

I answered. I usually ignore you but since you felt your stupid question was important I answered. Do you have any follow up or are you going to whine about the snub?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
I can understand why you're so worried about responding to my question of Noah's world and it's because you've realized that it might ust make you look foolish. :good4u:
Click to expand...

This is why i have you on ignore. I answered. #728. You asked in #716 and addressed it to no one in particular. No one is evading your infantile question. Are you capable of moving the discussion forward?
 
Last edited:
Professor Baxter said:
This is why i have you on ignore. I answered. #728. You asked in #716 and addressed it to know one in particular. No one is evading your infantile question. Are you capable of moving the discussion forward?
Click to expand...

Hmmmmm; let's see.
You had post #715 and I posted my question right under yours.
Using liberal logic, it's apparent that I was speaking to you; seeing as how that's the excuse they always use.
And your answer was only in regards to what you want the interpretation to be and didn't answer the question.

This brings us to the part where we can move forward, if you answer the question.
How big do you think Noah's world was, at the time of the flood?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I asked you for evidence, you said it was commonly accepted.....do then not have any evidence?.....



they do.....the commonly accepted theory is creation.....
Click to expand...

No, you did not.

You keep claiming that this is MY theory. I have asked you how anything I have stated diverges from the commonly accepted theory. You have failed to answer or substantiate your claim.

The commonly accepted theory of evolution is not creation.

You are just spinning and trolling. You can't make your case.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Hmmmmm; let's see.
You had post #715 and I posted my question right under yours.
Using liberal logic, it's apparent that I was speaking to you; seeing as how that's the excuse they always use.
And your answer was only in regards to what you want the interpretation to be and didn't answer the question.

This brings us to the part where we can move forward, if you answer the question.
How big do you think Noah's world was, at the time of the flood?
Click to expand...

You are on ignore. I saw you whining on tapatalk. I answered your question in #728.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
How big was the world that Noah lived in?
Click to expand...

Here you go.

Professor Baxter said:
When was this question asked?

A localized flood is clearly not what is claimed by the bible. All flesh.... face of the earth.... the covenant that never again would the lord flood the world as he had. It clearly intends a worldwide flood or it's still in error, since we have had many localized floods.

How big is God's world?
Click to expand...

If you can't offer a response then that must mean you agree, fully and completely.
 
Professor Baxter said:
Here you go.



If you can't offer a response then that must mean you agree, fully and completely.
Click to expand...

But this is about the flood of Noah and the how it affected his world, so how big was Noah's world at the time of the flood?
Or how big did Noah think the world was, if that makes it easier for you?

I've made this as simple as I can for you and yet you still seem to be having a problem with it.
Maybe you could ask someone for help.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
But this is about the flood of Noah and the how it affected his world, so how big was Noah's world at the time of the flood?
Or how big did Noah think the world was, if that makes it easier for you?

I've made this as simple as I can for you and yet you still seem to be having a problem with it.
Maybe you could ask someone for help.
Click to expand...

No, it is not just about how it affected Noah. That has nothing at all to do with the context of the discussions.

The biblical account is more than just a tale about Noah. It has been brought up in these discussions based on it as a supposed worldwide event and in reference to its supposed impact on the diversity of life. It's only after this notion of it as a worldwide event has been trashed that pmp has vaguely rejected the biblical account. But if you are going to question the accuracy of the bible's claim that it was worldwide then why not reject the bible's claim that it ever actually happened?

It does not matter how big Noah thought the world was. He did not write Genesis.

I am having no problem in demonstrating how irrelevant your question is or how your suggestion does not agree with the Bible, and creates continuity problems. You are having a problem digesting those facts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top