Dear DNC

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
And where did I say this? Is this your painfully obvious way of deflecting the discussion to try and cover the FACT that the posts show YOU introducing all these homo-phobic accusations when it was NOT provoked? All I did was take Grind seriously when he wasn't....BFD.

Southie, you're one fucked up little man (or woman). Grow up and deal with reality when the facts don't agree with your beliefs...stop drinking the neocon Kool-Aid, deal with your prejudices and realize that having the last word on this forum does not mean you're right or you've "won". If you continue on this course, you'll be as willfully stupid and deluded as Yurt or Meme.
Click to expand...

Southern Man said:
So you're sexist as well as racist and stupid.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes: Good lord, you are NOT that intelligent....let me dumb it down for you. The part you highlighted is my acknowledging that I do not know YOUR sex. This is an anonymous site...so your identity is hidden, UNLESS YOU DECIDE TO GIVE OUT INFORMATION.

I was merely covering both bases. It could only be "sexist" if I said you were fucked-upped BECAUSE you were a man or woman. Since I DID NOT state or suggest this, your allegation has no basis in logic or reality.

As for accusing me of racism....you proposed that nonsense before and provided a bloggers self defined version of "neocon" that construes it as anti-semetic. What's wrong with that analogy is as follows:

Neocon is an abbreviation for "new conservative". A new conservative is a person who was formerly a liberal who now embraces a the conservative viewpoint of an Executive branch centric gov't that follows edicts layed out in such passages as the Project for a New American Century and highlighted by the last administration.

Since anyone can be a neocon, and the most celebrated "neocons" are folk like Limbaugh, Hannity, Crowley, Malkin, Beck, Rumsfeld, Gingrich, GW Bush, Cheney....the label of "anti-semitism" or "racism" could not be applied.

I was wrong about taking Grind seriously and have admitted it. So you've got nothing to gripe about except your grudge against me decostructing all your past BS. Carry on
 
Taichiliberal said:
:rolleyes: Good lord, you are NOT that intelligent....let me dumb it down for you. The part you highlighted is my acknowledging that I do not know YOUR sex. This is an anonymous site...so your identity is hidden, UNLESS YOU DECIDE TO GIVE OUT INFORMATION....
Click to expand...
Let me give you a clue: My name is "Southern Man".

My what irony. :)
 
Southern Man said:
Let me give you a clue: My name is "Southern Man".

My what irony. :)
Click to expand...

Obviously, you have a limited imagination.....what better way for a person to hide their identity than to take a screen name that indicates opposite of their true sex. Perhaps you're relatively new to this game...it's been done before.

But now we all know that you're a guy.....doesn't change the fact that you're still braying like an ass beyond my admitting I was fooled by Grind.

Oh, and please take a refresher course in English composition so you know the definition of a word and how to properly apply it to a discussion....I'm beginning to be embarassed for you.

I'm done with you here.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Obviously, you have a limited imagination.....what better way for a person to hide their identity than to take a screen name that indicates opposite of their true sex. Perhaps you're relatively new to this game...it's been done before.

But now we all know that you're a guy.....doesn't change the fact that you're still braying like an ass beyond my admitting I was fooled by Grind.

Oh, and please take a refresher course in English composition so you know the definition of a word and how to properly apply it to a discussion....I'm beginning to be embarassed [sic] for you.

I'm done with you here.
Click to expand...
More delicious irony. :)
 
Taichiliberal said:
Obviously, you have a limited imagination.....what better way for a person to hide their identity than to take a screen name that indicates opposite of their true sex. Perhaps you're relatively new to this game...it's been done before.

But now we all know that you're a guy.....doesn't change the fact that you're still braying like an ass beyond my admitting I was fooled by Grind.

Oh, and please take a refresher course in English composition so you know the definition of a word and how to properly apply it to a discussion....I'm beginning to be embarassed for you.

I'm done with you here.
Click to expand...

HIV = AIDS

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwGP9DAAi4A"]YouTube - Family Guy - The AIDS Song[/ame]
 
Last edited:
T&A said:
NO


You are far to funny for me to act mature while in the same thread
Click to expand...

Translation: This clown can't debate like a rational adult, so he tries to substitute sophomoric humor for logic, facts and real discussion. Given this, it's pointless to respond or engage him further.
 
Newsflash, there's no debate going on in this thread. It was a joke, orchestrated by Grind, that you took seriously. Apparently you got into a "debate" with SM about his gender. Congradulations.

There is no debate going on in this thread.
 
Threedee said:
Newsflash, there's no debate going on in this thread. Then why throw in your 2 cents? Clearly, you've just just got an axe to grind. It was a joke, orchestrated by Grind, that you took seriously. No shit sherlock, and since I copped to that LONG time ago, it seems that Southie (and you) are just pissed off and need to rail about anything. Apparently you got into a "debate" with SM about his gender. Pay attention, the gender thing was just a side bar that wasn't a "debate". Congradulations. t instead of d

There is no debate going on in this thread.
Click to expand...
Not with you or Southie, that is for sure. You did make a reference to a previous thread I started, so I took you up on that. If you don't have the brains or the balls to debate that, then don't bring it up and then wussy out.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Not with you or Southie, that is for sure. You did make a reference to a previous thread I started, so I took you up on that. If you don't have the brains or the balls to debate that, then don't bring it up and then wussy out.
Click to expand...

Yeah, the AIDS debate is not a debate either. The scientific community is quite clear about that.
 
Threedee said:
Yeah, the AIDS debate is not a debate either. The scientific community is quite clear about that.
Click to expand...

Yeah, let me know when the "scientific community" produces that paper that proves in no uncertain terms that HIV=AIDS...because to date, there isn't one. Mullis couldn't find it after 3 years of searching for it. And if you swallow the BS as to why there is a different set of testing standards between Africa and Europe/North America for the same virus to indicate AIDS, then there's a bridge in Brooklyn I can let you have cheap.
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:
Yeah, let me know when the "scientific community" produces that paper that proves in no uncertain terms that HIV=AIDS...because to date, there isn't one. Mullis couldn't find it after 3 years of searching for it. And if you swallow the BS as to why there is a different set of testing standards between Africa and Europe/North America for the same virus to indicate AIDS, then there's a bridge in Brooklyn I can let you have cheap.
Click to expand...

You are giving me the argument that Africa, which is always treated differently/worse than Europe/North America, places a hole in the argument because, as per usual, people of a minority race are treated differenly than white people?
 
this thread is exactly like the classic film "11 minutes", I would explain to you all what that means but you wouldn't understand it anyway
 
Threedee said:
You are giving me the argument that Africa, which is always treated differently/worse than Europe/North America, places a hole in the argument because, as per usual, people of a minority race are treated differenly than white people?
Click to expand...

Thanks for displaying sheer ignorance of the subject. Since I wrote NOTHING that would give you pause for this diatribe, it speaks volumes as to how your mind works. Riddle me this, batman....if you have German measles in Canada and German measles in Sweden, do you think different tests are used to determine this? Here, for your education as to what's going on in Africa and why the HIV-AIDS doesn't quite work:

http://www.duesberg.com/subject/africa2.html
 
Taichiliberal said:
Thanks for displaying sheer ignorance of the subject. Since I wrote NOTHING that would give you pause for this diatribe, it speaks volumes as to how your mind works. Riddle me this, batman....if you have German measles in Canada and German measles in Sweden, do you think different tests are used to determine this? Here, for your education as to what's going on in Africa and why the HIV-AIDS doesn't quite work:

http://www.duesberg.com/subject/africa2.html
Click to expand...

For your information, HIV=AIDS.
 
Originally Posted by Threedee
You are giving me the argument that Africa, which is always treated differently/worse than Europe/North America, places a hole in the argument because, as per usual, people of a minority race are treated differenly than white people?
Click to expand...

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Thanks for displaying sheer ignorance of the subject. Since I wrote NOTHING that would give you pause for this diatribe, it speaks volumes as to how your mind works. Riddle me this, batman....if you have German measles in Canada and German measles in Sweden, do you think different tests are used to determine this? Here, for your education as to what's going on in Africa and why the HIV-AIDS doesn't quite work:

http://www.duesberg.com/subject/africa2.html
Click to expand...

Threedee said:
For your information, HIV=AIDS.
Click to expand...

Just as I thought, you've got nothing. 'Nite gracie!
 
Taichiliberal said:
Just as I thought, you've got nothing. 'Nite gracie!
Click to expand...

"We typically think of a new epidemic in a "virgin" population as something that arises suddenly, sweeps through the population in a few months, and then wanes and disappears."

Typically, HIV doesn't crop up among virgin populations.

But seriously, this guy is pissed because HIV is different from other plagues where people can develop immunities over time, such as with smallpox, where all survivors are left forever immune to the disease.

This is retarded, there's no rule that states people's bodies need to develop immunities over time? Is there even evidence that Europeans developed immunities to beubonic plague? He should also be pissed that HIV is not airborne (like smallpox) or waterborne (like cholera), or winterborn (like our very our Socrtease).

Oh, and I forgot to mention that in this case we are dealing with the Human IMMUNODEFICIENCY Virus, and Aquired IMMUNE DEFICIENCY Syndrome!

Conspiracy FAIL.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top