Debunking Covid stupidity part one: Vaccines DO slow the spread

Teacher: Okay kids, here is today's math problem. Sally has nine apples, and Jane has three apples. Who has more apples? Is it

a) Jane
b) Sally
c) They both have the same number of apples
d) I am too fucking stupid to understand math.

Teacher: Yes, anatta, I see you have your hand up. Again.
anatta: D.
Teacher: In your case, that's correct, but does anyone else want to try?
Sirshrinksalot: Oh, oh, it's c. Because you didn't provide a link showing how many apples. So that's that.
Teacher: That's a good guess, but no. LIfe is Golden, you had your hand up
Life is Golden: Why is the government forcing Sally to have so many apples? Why are they mandating these inhuman apple quotas?

Ah, a day in the life of a teacher at Bullshit Mountain High.
worthless deflection
you forgot the exponential nature of spreading- not static "apples in your hand"

go do something useful instead of pettifogging
 
Here's a pretty graph. :awesome:

sLkTyR9.png

that graph goes a long way to clarify the RO issue, but some people don't do graphs, like stinky
 
The CFR for an emerging disease like COVID-19 is remarkably hard to estimate accurately, simply because all the numbers involved are relatively small. A preliminary calculation from February 8, 2020 estimates CFR of about 1.4 percent—meaning out of 1,000 infected people, around 14 will die—but that’s based only on cases from outside China, since the data from that nation’s government has been unreliable. The numbers will likely shift over the next weeks and months, but the CFR for COVID-19 seems to be lower than for SARS and MERS. However, the high concentration of cases in one region of China is putting a huge stress on the healthcare infrastructure, which is a concern for any major epidemic.

https://www.popsci.com/story/health/how-diseases-spread/
 
The CFR for an emerging disease like COVID-19 is remarkably hard to estimate accurately, simply because all the numbers involved are relatively small. A preliminary calculation from February 8, 2020 estimates CFR of about 1.4 percent—meaning out of 1,000 infected people, around 14 will die—but that’s based only on cases from outside China, since the data from that nation’s government has been unreliable. The numbers will likely shift over the next weeks and months, but the CFR for COVID-19 seems to be lower than for SARS and MERS. However, the high concentration of cases in one region of China is putting a huge stress on the healthcare infrastructure, which is a concern for any major epidemic.

https://www.popsci.com/story/health/how-diseases-spread/

HORSE SHIT. LONG DEBUNKED/IRRELEVANT DATA FROM FEB 2020.

WE HAVE LEARNED MUCH SINCE THEN, SUCH AS THE VACCINES DO NOT STOP THE CONTRACTING OR TRANSMISSION OF COVID.


STOP THE DATED BULLSHIT AND LIES.
 
HORSE SHIT. LONG DEBUNKED/IRRELEVANT DATA FROM FEB 2020.

WE HAVE LEARNED MUCH SINCE THEN, SUCH AS THE VACCINES DO NOT STOP THE CONTRACTING OR TRANSMISSION OF COVID.


STOP THE DATED BULLSHIT AND LIES.

Nobody claimed that the vaccines stop the transmission.
 
THE DESPERATE CORON-A-CRATS KEEP POSTING "STUDIES" FROM LAST SUMMER< OR EVEN OLDER, TO TRY TO SUPPORT THEIR DEBUNKED LIES ABOUT THE EFFICACY OF THE VACCINES , ALMOST ALL OF WHICH IS NO LONGER TRUE, IF IT EVER WAS.




THE VACCINES DO NOT STOP THE CONTRACTING ,OR TRANSMISSION OF COVID. PERIOD.



STOP THE FUCKING LIES.
 
The test is measuring the viral load of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated, any other measuring stick is inferior, any guesses are useless.
 
The test is measuring the viral load of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated, any other measuring stick is inferior, any guesses are useless.

EXACTLY. AND THE VACCINATED CAN CARRY THE SAME VIRAL LOAD AS THE UNVACCINATED.


IOW....THE VACCINES DO NOT STOP THE SPREAD OF COVID.


PERIOD.
 
The test is measuring the viral load of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated, any other measuring stick is inferior, any guesses are useless.
pretty much so since COVID is so widespread- the exception is social distancing which is proven to stop the spread
But it's an impossible task in our society
 
pretty much so since COVID is so widespread- the exception is social distancing which is proven to stop the spread
But it's an impossible task in our society

THeories and lab tests are what you use if you cant go take a look at reality in the real world, which we can easily do to settle this question of whether the jabs reduce transmission, and do they do it enough to matter.
 
THeories and lab tests are what you use if you cant go take a look at reality in the real world, which we can easily do to settle this question of whether the jabs reduce transmission, and do they do it enough to matter.

THEY LESSEN THE SEVERITY OF SYMPTOMS...WHICH IS A GOOD THING, COMPLETELY UNNECESSARY FOR THE YOUNG, ESPECIALLY CHILDREN.

THEY DO NOT STOP THE SPREAD OF COIVD....UNFORTUNATELY.
 
THEY LESSEN THE SEVERITY OF SYMPTOMS...WHICH IS A GOOD THING, COMPLETELY UNNECESSARY FOR THE YOUNG, ESPECIALLY CHILDREN.

THEY DO NOT STOP THE SPREAD OF COIVD....UNFORTUNATELY.

Obviously they do not stop the spread, but do they even reduce it? We dont know, and I think the reason we dont know is because almost no one has looked, because power does not want this questioned answered. Not finding the answers to questions that power does not want asked or answered has been going on for over two decades, and is a huge part of the corruption of science. This part of the corruption is driven by the strangle hold on funding, that which power does not want done does not get funded, so the work never happens.
 
We know now that we were lied to about both the safety and the efficacy of the jabs, the only thing we dont know yet is how badly we fucked ourselves with the always idiotic Mass Vax Program.
 
THeories and lab tests are what you use if you cant go take a look at reality in the real world, which we can easily do to settle this question of whether the jabs reduce transmission, and do they do it enough to matter.

Says the guy that can't add 2+2.
 
We know now that we were lied to about both the safety and the efficacy of the jabs, the only thing we dont know yet is how badly we fucked ourselves with the always idiotic Mass Vax Program.

By 'we' you mean you and the turd in your pocket? Where did you get this information? LOL at you. You are a fucking stooge. You have zero evidence of your claims. None.
 
worthless deflection
you forgot the exponential nature of spreading- not static "apples in your hand"

go do something useful instead of pettifogging

No, I didn't you stupid fucking dipshit. Jesus Christ. Did you know that 3 to third power is less than nine to third power. Wow, you are just a complete fucking dimwit.
 
Back
Top