Defend This

Poor whore. No one cares. Did you ever get your stuff out of the dryer in time to make it to the KKKonclave last night? Sorry about your eyebrows. Stand back from the burning cross next time, eh? :laugh:

WT3XnYF.jpg
 
Sirthinksalot said:
That wasn't a catch, the point was asking if Christiefan would be willing to give up protections from other amendments if it would save lives. And apparently it sailed over bowel woman's head too.
Click to expand...

If I'm reading you correctly, you're saying we would not have certain rights if it weren't for the Bill of Rights. I disagree. The BOR doesn't automatically guarantee protections; if it did there would be no lawsuits regarding free speech, for example, or freedom of religion.
 
christiefan915 said:
If I'm reading you correctly, you're saying we would not have certain rights if it weren't for the Bill of Rights. I disagree. The BOR doesn't automatically guarantee protections; if it did there would be no lawsuits regarding free speech, for example, or freedom of religion.
Click to expand...

Right. The whole purpose of the U.S. Sct. is to further define those rights and the amendments as regards whatever current case is before them. I don't think StinksALot gets that.
 
rjhenn said:
Your side uses dead children to hide your complete lack of rational arguments.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

My side doesn't say things like "i don't mind kids being shot" or "i don't care how many kids get shot as long as our 2nd amendment rights are preserved."
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
It changes nothing, Sailor. This private moment between survivors and POTUS/FLOTUS was used by them as a publicity stunt. See my other post about how someone with class could have handled it.
Click to expand...

It changes everything. What is was presented as, and what it actually is are two completely different things.
 
Sailor said:
It changes everything. What is was presented as, and what it actually is are two completely different things.
Click to expand...

How is that? What went down: Trump's aides contacted the uncle about a face-to-face. Uncle agreed, brought child, says that he and his deceased brother are Trump followers. So they meet "privately," yet photos are taken. Not of a President and FLOTUS consoling the bereaved, but grinning and thumbs-upping. Instead of keeping this meeting private, maybe giving the uncle the photos for the child to have later on, Melania posts it on her official Twitter account. Two unsympathetic media whores, posing and grinning with the survivors of a massacre. And you don't think that looks terribly, terribly bad?
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
How is that? What went down: Trump's aides contacted the uncle about a face-to-face. Uncle agreed, brought child, says that he and his deceased brother are Trump followers. So they meet "privately," yet photos are taken. Not of a President and FLOTUS consoling the bereaved, but grinning and thumbs-upping. Instead of keeping this meeting private, maybe giving the uncle the photos for the child to have later on, Melania posts it on her official Twitter account. Two unsympathetic media whores, posing and grinning with the survivors of a massacre. And you don't think that looks terribly, terribly bad?
Click to expand...

That is untrue. Completely untrue. What I have come to expect from liberals.

Tito Anchondo, whose brother and sister-in-law were killed in the attack, chose to take his orphaned nephew to meet the president and first lady. The 2-month-old boy suffered two broken fingers, but he survived the shooting after his parents shielded him.

Anchondo told The Washington Post he wanted to take the boy to meet the president and tell him about his family.

“He was just there as a human being, consoling us and giving his condolences,” Anchondo said of Trump.

Anchondo said Trump “wasn’t there to be pushing any kind of political agenda,” calling the meeting “a private conversation between human beings.”
 
Sailor said:
That is untrue. Completely untrue. What I have come to expect from liberals.

Tito Anchondo, whose brother and sister-in-law were killed in the attack, chose to take his orphaned nephew to meet the president and first lady. The 2-month-old boy suffered two broken fingers, but he survived the shooting after his parents shielded him.

Anchondo told The Washington Post he wanted to take the boy to meet the president and tell him about his family.

“He was just there as a human being, consoling us and giving his condolences,” Anchondo said of Trump.

Anchondo said Trump “wasn’t there to be pushing any kind of political agenda,” calling the meeting “a private conversation between human beings.”
Click to expand...

We know all this. It's been repeated ad nauseum. What you don't want to address is that the TrumpPublicityWhores(tm) later used the meeting for political reasons. MELANIA posted the offensive photo on her Twitter. The media didn't post it first -- they merely repeated her Tweet. You will defend those whores to the death, apparently. There is something missing in you (group you) if you don't think that that photo should have been kept private, because it shows the very, very ugly side of the Worst Family.
 
Sailor said:
That is untrue. Completely untrue. What I have come to expect from liberals.

Tito Anchondo, whose brother and sister-in-law were killed in the attack, chose to take his orphaned nephew to meet the president and first lady. The 2-month-old boy suffered two broken fingers, but he survived the shooting after his parents shielded him.

Anchondo told The Washington Post he wanted to take the boy to meet the president and tell him about his family.

“He was just there as a human being, consoling us and giving his condolences,” Anchondo said of Trump.

Anchondo said Trump “wasn’t there to be pushing any kind of political agenda,” calling the meeting “a private conversation between human beings.”
Click to expand...
Facts do not matter to the Trump Deranged. They say "get bad orange man" and no matter how many times, how many outlets publish the fact the uncle pursued the meeting -- they will say the opposite.

They are nuts, without question.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top