Democrats Should Ditch the Anti-Gun Rhetoric

SmarterthanYou said:
you missed putting the center mass circle on huber, laying in the street, where he took a single round center mass that macerated his heart and lungs.............
Click to expand...

He's dead. You can waste your time shooting dead men. I prefer to focus on live active shooters, terrorists and other scumbags.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Abortion isn't murder and neither is self-defense.

All Americans have a right of self-defense.

5uigxb.jpg
Click to expand...

Lol, abortion is murder, and if one can flee or use pepper spray, or fire warning shots,why should killing in self defense be the first option!?
 
What anti gun rhetoric? Wanting to regulate AR-15s is not being anti gun.

It has been noted that I am for the 2nd 100 percent.
 
AProudLefty said:
What ani gun rhetoric? Wanting to regulate AR-15s is not being anti gun.

It has been noted that I am for the 2nd 100 percent.
Click to expand...

Banning scary-looking guns is bullshit. The AR-15 is waaaay down the list of guns used to kill people.

The most common gun is a handgun. 2/3s of all gun deaths are suicides and most of them are done with one shot from a pistol.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Define what is and isn't an active shooter.

IMO, he looked like one and Grosskruetz would have been legal to empty the Glock into his back.
Click to expand...

your opinion belies common sense and ignores the law..........if kyle was an active shooter, he's a lazy assed one.......running down the street he had a multitude of targets, yet he didn't shoot anyone until he was attacked. now you have a laymans generic exampe of what isn't an active shooter. Had grosskreutz emptied his glock in to kyles back, he'd be the one on trial for murder......
 
NikodemPoplawski said:
Lol, abortion is murder, and if one can flee or use pepper spray, or fire warning shots,why should killing in self defense be the first option!?
Click to expand...

you need to learn the law a little better before you start trying to spout bullshit. warning shots have always been considered reckless endangerment........police are trained to shoot to end the threat, not fire warning shots. civilian self defense classes with firearms are taught the same
 
NikodemPoplawski said:
Lol, A well regulated militia.

I'm pretty sure regulated fits with background checks.

Now who is it that's a bestial retarded Animal!?
You!
Click to expand...

not a single founding father considered well regulated to be anything other than properly functioning and certainly didn't give any authority or power to the new federal government to regulate firearms
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you need to learn the law a little better before you start trying to spout bullshit. warning shots have always been considered reckless endangerment........police are trained to shoot to end the threat, not fire warning shots. civilian self defense classes with firearms are taught the same
Click to expand...

Well, why shoot someone with a fist like Trayvon had, in the arm!?

Not sure why Southerners love killing so much.

Truly a backwards people.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
your opinion belies common sense and ignores the law..........if kyle was an active shooter, he's a lazy assed one.......running down the street he had a multitude of targets, yet he didn't shoot anyone until he was attacked. now you have a laymans generic exampe of what isn't an active shooter. Had grosskreutz emptied his glock in to kyles back, he'd be the one on trial for murder......
Click to expand...

If Kyle had half a magazine of 9mm in his back, like the other two, he wouldn't be able to be a witness. LOL

He was an active shooter and, besides being on the streets that night which they were guilty of doing, his next mistake was hesitating shooting the active shooter down when he had the drop on him.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
hyperbolic argument..........you've already lost. but i'm curious, since you bring this up, would you charge a 6 year old with illegally using a gun if they used it to kill a home intruder????
Click to expand...

So, you agree that 6 year olds don't deserve equal rights due to maturity reasons!?

Well, gee why so against the Constitution!?
Derp, derp.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
If Kyle had half a magazine of 9mm in his back, like the other two, he wouldn't be able to be a witness. LOL
Click to expand...
but there would be VIDEO!!!!!!!

Dutch Uncle said:
He was an active shooter and, besides being on the streets that night which they were guilty of doing, his next mistake was hesitating shooting the active shooter down when he had the drop on him.
Click to expand...
you don't have facts, you have wishes.........you still don't understand what an active shooter is and isn't.............
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top