Into the Night
Verified User
Ken Paxton is a crook and I hope he goes to prison to serve the maximum penalty.
Filing a lawsuit is not a criminal offense.
Ken Paxton is a crook and I hope he goes to prison to serve the maximum penalty.
Big Tech should cancel any accounts the Florida Idiot uses, based on a conflict of interests.
No it isn't, but go ahead and hold your breath until you wish comes true.
Of course they can. Good luck defining 'interfering in a Florida election' as a private business making decisions about who they do business with. You are such a fucking twit.
You should also follow the rules here.
JPP is actually excellent in this regard. It an exception in this regard. Divisional error fallacy. The exception does not prove the rule.
I am not on your property, dumbass.
Usually. The fact you, once again, don't know what you are talking about regarding Paxton's legal issues, is more proof your grasp on reality is tenuous.Filing a lawsuit is not a criminal offense.
Republicans didn't force anyone to bake 'gaycakes', moron.Which is exactly the hazard we face when Republicans act like authoritarian Democrats.
There are levels of corruption and cronyism along with incompetence**. Yes, they're all crooks but Paxton and Cruz are Trump authoritarians seeking to overthrow the US government.
Trump is Dr. Frankenstein. Although problems have been growing for 25 years, Trump called all the nutjobs together and enabled them. Mainline Republicans opposed him but were either kicked out in the 2018 midterm or bent the knee for Trump. In Cruz's case, he slapped his wife and sucked Trump's mushroom dick in public. The rest of the Republican party similarly knelt down to Trump. Now Trump is out but the Monster still exists.
It'll take a little time to kill the Monster....which will happen over the rest of the year.
**Hanlon's Razor applies to many politicians.
Like your other fucked up and misdirected posts, sir, you are responding to the wrong person.Republicans didn't force anyone to bake 'gaycakes', moron.
People who believe in Alternative Facts and live in an Alternative Universe want to make whatever rules suit them best regardless of logic, reason or fairness.
The Republican Party has a rough 4-6 years facing it.
It is sublime. Basically, the proposal goes like this: Private social media companies may enforce their terms of service.... except in the case of a politician. No TOS for them, they can say whatever the fuck they want. Because they are a 'protected class'. The stupidity needed to advance that argument leaves me speechless. I agree, I think more on the high side of that time frame.
Protected from what? That's the point. Those campaigns are being removed because they violate the terms of service, not because they are politicians. Is this really that difficult for you to figure out?
OMFG are you fucking serious? That's not what protective class means. Jesus you are just beyond stupid. Being in a protected class means you are protected from actions taken SOLELY BECAUSE YOU ARE A PART OF THAT CLASS. You are not immune and cannot be made immune from a private companies terms of service. I tried, but you are just too fucking stupid. Off you go.
Conservatives would not favor more government regulation just because they don't like something. "Big Tech" seems to be the new villain replacing the Koch Brothers, Soros, MSM, etc. We need an enemy to blame for the latest evils.
Hallucinations. Psychoquackery.
ROFLMAO. Duuuude! Don't you see the irony? Your phrase "Buzzword fallacies" is a Buzzword fallacy.Buzzword fallacies. There are no such things as 'alternative facts'. Learn what 'fact' means. There is no such thing as an 'alternative Universe'. Fanciful tales of an 'alternative Universe' are describing something that is IN The Universe.
I suspect the Founding Fathers would have supported the 1st amendment over Corporation rights.
Very much like what they have in China, with websites and publishers being required to put out the parties position.
LMAO!
So Conservatives apparently hate the free market now.
It is not opinions. It is censorship. It is violation of their own terms of service. It is slander.We need someone to stand up to publishers "capriciously" having opinions?
No such proposal. You are hallucinating again.They need to have government approval to disagree with the Republicans?
Censorship is not freedom of expression.And you think that is freedom of expression?
No one is forbidding opinions except the Democrats and Democrat owned Big Tech.Freedom of expression is having the right to have opinions without the permission of the government.
Yes it does. Contract law still eludes you. Common carrier laws still elude you.It does not matter if someone in government finds them "capricious".