American Man
Verified User
I answered it. It's not my fault you are illiterate.
Saying that you have a relative in an interracial marriage does not answer whether or not you oppose interracial marriage.
I answered it. It's not my fault you are illiterate.
Saying that you have a relative in an interracial marriage does not answer whether or not you oppose interracial marriage.
I said he was a good, conservative man. Doesn't that imply I approve? Or do you need it simplified further?
It's funny how you absolutely cannot answer the question.
Again: Do you oppose interracial marriage?
Be a man and answer directly.
Reaganomics: using the federal gov't to enact laws that allow corporations to operate without full regards for the "general welfare" of the citizenry, and to make them immune from public scrutiny and protest.
Simply put; using gov't to get gov't "off the people's backs".
And this bit of schizoid "logic" is STILL defended to this day, despite the documented economic disaster it has brought to this country in the last 40 years ... TWICE.
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Reaganomics: using the federal gov't to enact laws that allow corporations to operate without full regards for the "general welfare" of the citizenry, and to make them immune from public scrutiny and protest.
Simply put; using gov't to get gov't "off the people's backs".
And this bit of schizoid "logic" is STILL defended to this day, despite the documented economic disaster it has brought to this country in the last 40 years ... TWICE.
Reagan, who spent his life in government, said government is the enemy.
He was what he was....a B grade actor who would never had the career he had if it weren't for WW2 ... an opportunistic political shill long on idealism but woefully short on practical application and reality.
Reagan fucked this country but good. The way he died was fitting, IMHO.
As President of the Actors Guild, Reagan ratted out the commies to the HUAC. With pleasure.
And, given history, you think that was a bad thing?
And, given history, you think that was a bad thing?
Yes, because they lost their jobs and source of income as actors or writers.
So, even if some were spies working for the Soviet Union (and some were), or such all that matters to you is they lost their jobs?
They were never accused of being spies.
"Spy" was too strong a word. Sympathizer or advocate would be better.
I said he was a good, conservative man. Doesn't that imply I approve? Or do you need it simplified further?
Republicans. Good for them! They give tax breaks to everyone.
Republicans. Good for them! Oppressive regulations strangle liberty and business.
None. The wealthy and corporations work for themselves.
It is Democrats that have instituted oligarchies and dictatorships.
Get government out of the way of people. Let them choose their own path to success, each according to his own initiative and drive.
Inversion fallacy. It is YOU that has it backward. You cannot lay YOUR problems on someone else.
No, it does not. It is equiv to saying the best negros are your friends which was how selective bigotry was justified a couple of decades ago. It is very specific to one person and you expect us to extrapolate that to all blacks. The connection does not exist in that statement.
American conservatism exists, if I could put it in my own words, to clean up the messes created by the country’s dominant class of liberal elites. The Reagan Revolution wasn’t a proper “revolution” at all but a series of conservative repairs, chief among them reforming a crippling tax code and revivifying the American economy. The great triumph of neoconservatism in the 1970s and ’80s was not the formulation of some original philosophy but the demonstration that liberal policies had ruined our cities.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/grumbl...gvkdqlo5cue&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
So, no.
Not illegal to have free thought. No?