Do you still support America's genocide in the Middle East?


Several people have posted the definition of the word "genocide". Our war in Itaq does not qualify as genocide.

We have armed and trained a portion of the population. If we wanted to wipe out all iraqis, we would certainly not be training them and turning their security over to them.

Plus, as I posted earlier, while many iraqis have died, it is actually a small part of the population.

Quite simply, our purpose, goal, or military efforts have never been to wipe out the people of Iraq. Therefore, it is not an attempt at genocide.
 
How is it that someone as ignorant and rude as you could be a moderator?

Are you capable of debate or just insult?

What ever your conclusion is, of my abilities, has nothing to do with the fact that your dumbfuck attempt to show that the US is committing genocide, in Iraq, has failed
 
So your position is that if we have not given a reason for the war, it is genocide by default?

Ok, then we have failed miserably at it. The best estimates put iragi dead at around or under 150,000. As tragis as that may be, the current population is 31,494,287. Which means 0.48% of the population has died in this war.

Where did you get the "millions" figure you used earlier?

First, we are not done yet.

Second, we obviously have to make it look like a normal invasion of a soverign nation, not an outright act of genocide.

Even using your extremely conservative number of 150,000 dead, we have killed almost 1/2 of 1% of the population of an entire country, apparently for no reason! What else could you call it?
 
Several people have posted the definition of the word "genocide". Our war in Itaq does not qualify as genocide.

We have armed and trained a portion of the population. If we wanted to wipe out all iraqis, we would certainly not be training them and turning their security over to them.

Plus, as I posted earlier, while many iraqis have died, it is actually a small part of the population.

Quite simply, our purpose, goal, or military efforts have never been to wipe out the people of Iraq. Therefore, it is not an attempt at genocide.

Maybe the war would have ended sooner if we had used genocide which is a very effective military tactic. We could have killed all the international bankers. The swiss, american, german, russian, (chinese, oops couldn't finance war if we did that), Japanese, kill all the bankers. Win war quickly. Kill the evil conspiraters bent on world domination and global financial collapse. o wait Asshatzombie all ready did.
 
What ever your conclusion is, of my abilities, has nothing to do with the fact that your dumbfuck attempt to show that the US is committing genocide, in Iraq, has failed

And I think you are an asshole. Does just saying it make me right?

WHY THE FUCK ARE WE IN IRAQ! Give me one good reason. I don't think you can or you already would have.
 
First, we are not done yet.

Second, we obviously have to make it look like a normal invasion of a soverign nation, not an outright act of genocide.

Even using your extremely conservative number of 150,000 dead, we have killed almost 1/2 of 1% of the population of an entire country, apparently for no reason! What else could you call it?

What else would I call it? I would call it what it is. It is a war zone and people are dying. There are numerous reasons from Saddam's support of terrorists to WMDs, to Saddam's refusal to comply with the terms of his surrender, to whatever else has been used as a reason.

But you have absolutely no evidence that the US is trying to destroy the population of Iraq.

Your insistence that the war is a genocide ignores the definition of the word. The fact that no one has given you a suitable answer to why we are there does not change the fact that the war does not fit the definition.
 
And I think you are an asshole. Does just saying it make me right?

WHY THE FUCK ARE WE IN IRAQ! Give me one good reason. I don't think you can or you already would have.

I have never admitted that your opinion was in any way correct; but you have admitted that you are a dumbfuck.
Once again, this thread is about your dumbfuck idea that the US is committing genocide in Iraq; which we aren't engaged in.
 
And I think you are an asshole. Does just saying it make me right?

WHY THE FUCK ARE WE IN IRAQ! Give me one good reason. I don't think you can or you already would have.

Saddam was are enemy. We needed to look like we were doing something to win the war on terror. He was researching nukes. He was committing genocide. He was stupid enough to invaid quwait in the past. All the other muslim nations hated him especially the Saudis. We wanted to funnel all the terrorists into Iraq to fight us their instead of else where. We wanted to spread democracy. We knew he wanted revenge against us and was planning to screw america over by supporting the jihadists. He was an evil dude. He was destabalizing the region.
 
Several people have posted the definition of the word "genocide". Our war in Itaq does not qualify as genocide.

We have armed and trained a portion of the population. If we wanted to wipe out all iraqis, we would certainly not be training them and turning their security over to them.

Plus, as I posted earlier, while many iraqis have died, it is actually a small part of the population.

Quite simply, our purpose, goal, or military efforts have never been to wipe out the people of Iraq. Therefore, it is not an attempt at genocide.

Genocides in history - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:Irish_potato_famine_Bridget_O%27Donnel.jpg" class="image"><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/37/Irish_potato_famine_Bridget_O%27Donnel.jpg/150px-Irish_potato_famine_Bridget_O%27Donnel.jpg"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/thumb/3/37/Irish_potato_famine_Bridget_O%27Donnel.jpg/150px-Irish_potato_famine_Bridget_O%27Donnel.jpg

Here is a little more info on genocide. If you take the time to peruse the article, you may notice that the "definition of genocide is more than a little controversial. In fact, the presently legal definition in international law was insisted on by no less than Joseph Stalin. Gee, I guess he would know.
 
I have never admitted that your opinion was in any way correct; but you have admitted that you are a dumbfuck.
Once again, this thread is about your dumbfuck idea that the US is committing genocide in Iraq; which we aren't engaged in.

You can't answer the question, so you continue to insult me. Bravo!
 
Genocides in history - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here is a little more info on genocide. If you take the time to peruse the article, you may notice that the "definition of genocide is more than a little controversial. In fact, the presently legal definition in international law was insisted on by no less than Joseph Stalin. Gee, I guess he would know.

Stalin killed everyone especially the orginal communists leaders. He killed everyone in the soviet union pretty equally. He had no intention of eleminating any races just capitalists, facists and political dissidents,
Stalin was a genious and was capable of understanding anything. Who better to define genocide then someone who faced it during ww2. Hitler commited genocide against the Jews and slavic people of the soviet union. Hitler had plans to exterminate the russians, Ukranians, belarussians and almost everyone else. Hitler used genocide as a war tactic against the USSR. Stalin protected all of his people from extermination. It is a proven fact that hitler had detailed plans to white out most of the population of eastern europe. Hitler liberated the poles, czechs, and his own people from total elimenation. Because Stalin was able to win in the east many lives were saved from the genocidal germans. Millions of people died in eastern europe during ww2 because of the brutality and genocidal behavior of the germans. They starved people, but them in death camps, rounded people up in large numbers then opened fire. Stalin and the soviet people were experts in genocide after what the germans did to them. Who would know more then the soviets except the germans but everyone was kind of annoyed at the time because of all the genocide they committed.
 
Saddam was are enemy. We needed to look like we were doing something to win the war on terror. He was researching nukes. He was committing genocide. He was stupid enough to invaid quwait in the past. All the other muslim nations hated him especially the Saudis. We wanted to funnel all the terrorists into Iraq to fight us their instead of else where. We wanted to spread democracy. We knew he wanted revenge against us and was planning to screw america over by supporting the jihadists. He was an evil dude. He was destabalizing the region.

We have lots of enemies. Why haven't we invaded all their countries?
We invaded a nation to look like we were doing something?
No he wasn't. That lie has been disproven.
We did care when that happened in Rawanda.
We already took care of that. If it wasn't done we did we leave the first time?
We did it for King Saud?
Are you fucking kidding?
You spread democracy by starting a war?
We were the ones weho wanted revenge, moron.
Yes, he was evil. So is Castro.
He was a ball-less hasbeen by the time we got there.
 
You have proven yourself completely inept. Why are you here?

Do you have anything logical to say or not?

It's been showed to you that your dumbfuck idea that this is genocide was totally in error, so I guess you still hold the ineptness title.
 
Stalin killed everyone especially the orginal communists leaders. He killed everyone in the soviet union pretty equally. He had no intention of eleminating any races just capitalists, facists and political dissidents,
Stalin was a genious and was capable of understanding anything. Who better to define genocide then someone who faced it during ww2. Hitler commited genocide against the Jews and slavic people of the soviet union. Hitler had plans to exterminate the russians, Ukranians, belarussians and almost everyone else. Hitler used genocide as a war tactic against the USSR. Stalin protected all of his people from extermination. It is a proven fact that hitler had detailed plans to white out most of the population of eastern europe. Hitler liberated the poles, czechs, and his own people from total elimenation. Because Stalin was able to win in the east many lives were saved from the genocidal germans. Millions of people died in eastern europe during ww2 because of the brutality and genocidal behavior of the germans. They starved people, but them in death camps, rounded people up in large numbers then opened fire. Stalin and the soviet people were experts in genocide after what the germans did to them. Who would know more then the soviets except the germans but everyone was kind of annoyed at the time because of all the genocide they committed.

Are you fucking totaly insane? Stalin was responsible for more death than any other human in history.
 
It's been showed to you that your dumbfuck idea that this is genocide was totally in error, so I guess you still hold the ineptness title.

Like I said, you have no amunition in this fight, so you keep repeating the same thing, over and over and offer no proof, other than that I am a dumbfuck. You must be pretty embarassed by now.
 
Like I said, you have no amunition in this fight, so you keep repeating the same thing, over and over and offer no proof, other than that I am a dumbfuck. You must be pretty embarassed by now.

I have to admit that you finally were able to come to a logical conclusion and yes, I am embarassed that you are such a dumbfuck.

Please try to prove me incorrect.
 
Back
Top