You're starting to go a bit fa5r afield here.
Are you really that desperate?
Desperate about what? The topic is about indoctrination. My example qualifies. Are you desperate to avoid the embarrassing fact that you support indoctrination?
You're starting to go a bit fa5r afield here.
Are you really that desperate?
I'd love to believe everything you just said. But you're a liar. Until you come clean about your twump fetish, you're just going to keep hurting yourself. Tell us more about that, "Simple phone call", twumptard. The reason I'm bringing that up now is that after I called you on it, you tried every piece of twumptard bullshit to run away from your own statement, including claiming, "twump is not a factor anymore". He's a former president running for president and has a huge following. Along with not being able to see though your own hate, you can't see though your own bullshit.
You live alone in a broken-down mobile home you can barely make rent on.
Desperate about what? The topic is about indoctrination. My example qualifies. Are you desperate to avoid the embarrassing fact that you support indoctrination?
Hehehehe... whatever you say, dipshit.
You're still clinging onto that "phone call" comment, despite the fact that I've told you that, since you won't let it go, I'm just going to leave you hanging. You're actually too stupid to understand that I'm not going to explain anything to you. After all, if you've made one thing obvious, it's that you're simply too fucking stupid to understand an explanation, anyway...
I don't support any particular "indoctrination".
I do, however, support a parent's right to raise their child as they see fit, provided it doesn't endanger the child.
Why don't you support a parent's right to raise their child as they see fit? What are you doing to combat what you see as some heinous wrong?
Well your posts don't prove that. But if you are truthful, then I am glad.
Um everyone here in this thread agrees, DUH? No clue why you keep repeating the blatant obvious. Are you trying to convince yourself?
Again a personal attack.
I'm not "clinging" to anything. You made the statement and ran away like the lying pussy twumptard bitch you are. You should "skirt" that mobile home, Cletus. It'll help keep the vermin other than you out.
Where did you ever get the idea that I would support any particular indoctrination?
I support a parent's right to teach their children as they see fit, provided it doesn't endanger the child. I may not agree with what a Muslin teaches his children, but it's absolutely his right to teach them what he wants, wouldn't you agree?
Exactly how fragile is your psyche??
I didn't attack you. I asked you a question which was based on what you've written.
If you see that as an "attack", perhaps the internet's not for you...
Because you mocked me and my OP. It was a serious discussion about child abuse and indoctrination.
Of course I agree, fucktard. Jesus you're dumb.
The personal is not on me but on you. You felt it has gotten too personal for you so you lashed it out on me.
Something is obviously bothering you. If you want to talk about it, it's okay. We will be all ears.
You've asked numerous times about it.
I told you I've reached the point where I'm simply not going to explain it, and I'm not going to for two reasons: One, I already know you wouldn't accept the explanation and, two it's funny to watch you teeter back and forth, drooling from the corner of your mouth, chanting "PHONE CALL! PHONE CALL!" like Rainman...
You never tried to "explain" it. You deflected, attacked, moved goalposts, put up strawmen, but never addressed it. So, just another one of your lies. You are a twumptard, so I guess that's the best you can do.
I truly believe that you may be one of the most ignorant posters on the internet.
I didn't "mock" anything.
After you said you found yourself nodding your head as you considered what was unfolding, I said this:
You say it isn't "their" fault, yet your initial reaction would strongly suggest that you're one of them.
That's not mocking, that's simply me stating that you were just like them, yet you seemed to be trying to put some distance between you and them...
Then why did you ask about raising a child in a radical Muslim country

Because you were insisting on being obtuse and withholding information (such as the nature of your abuse). There was nothing to go on, so characterizing that abuse in any one way would be as accurate as characterizing it in any other way...
Do you know how to change the rear wheel bearings on a 2014 Chevy Malibu? They're fixin' to give up the ghost...
Actually, I did, and as expected you dismissed the explanation.
So, at this point, you can do one of two things: you can either accept that I'm not going to explain it to you a second time and move on, or you can flail around like a blubbering retard screaming "PHONE CALL! PHONE CALL!" like Rainman...
Yes you mocked my child abuse.
Correct. The child abuse, indoctrination and traumas are not their fault. It is on them to act on them or not. If they chose to act on them, that's where we draw the line. But the child abuse is one way to approach their hateful and vile bigotry.
"Just like them" is not the same thing as "I am a hateful bigot just like them". That is you putting words in my mouth.
I notice that you conveniently omitted the part about the radical Islamic countries. Gee I wonder why.![]()
I have already answered your question over and over and over and over and over again. The abuse was emotional in nature. If you cannot grok that, then ask me to clarify before you retardify yourself further.
Yawn.
Doubling down on your lie isn't working either. You never even tried to explain it.
I support a parent's right to teach their children as they see fit, provided it doesn't endanger the child. I may not agree with what a Muslin teaches his children, but it's absolutely his right to teach them what he wants, wouldn't you agree?....
Where? What did I say?
I see, so you're on board with the whole "personal responsibility" thing?
When I reply to you, I can only base the content of my posts based on what you've written...
No, I didn't. In fact, I specifically addressed it.
Such information would've been helpful from the get-go. For you to not provide that info and then get your panties twisted when someone asks about it is pretty stupid...
Yup, I got you pegged. You're a hypocrite...
Agreed on protecting the child. It's not just the parent's right to raise their kids as they see fit, it's their responsibility to do so too.
Parents refusing to let their children learn math; is that a parental right or a violation of parental responsibility?
Is teaching children bigotry a right or is it irresponsible since it limits the child's growth and development in 21st Century America?
I agree parents don't have to teach their 5 year olds that men fucking each other is okay. OTOH, they shouldn't be teaching them that it's wrong, either.
America needs both more tolerance and a stronger will to mind their own fucking business. Not everything has to be a social movement...
So you admit you have severe lack of reading comprehension. Not my problem. If you cannot see that the child emotional abuse and indoctrination in my OP, you might need to go see a doctor and get a MRI scan.
I have clarified my words to you many times and yet you still screech about it. You seem to be dissatisfied.
No you didn't. I said "Radical Islam" and you said "Islam". Or "Radical Islamic parents" and you said "Muslim parents".
I apologize for not make my OP "retard aided" I should have expected retards would respond to my OP but I always have high hopes for people.
And as I as I have stated above I have clarified it to you many times. You still are angry. Why?
I fail to see why this is a problem.