ZenMode
Well-known member
What majority? Hinduism is not monotheistic.
Combining Christianity and Islam is a majority of the religious world.
What majority? Hinduism is not monotheistic.
I don't care what they pled to. It wasn't an insurrection. It wasn't a coup. Only brain-dead morons can claim it was.
Tell you what, when has a coup or insurrection ever occurred without weapons? Right, NONE. Now run along dipstick.
Why are you lying about it and calling it an insurrection or coup? The only person who died that day was an UNARMED protestor. Why are you defending Fascism from the Democrats? Why are you a dumbass?
No one could have stopped the vote counting. The protestors were unarmed. Trump didn't encourage the violence. The protestors did very little damage. Many of those within the capitol were ALLOWED in by the Capitol police.
The liars on the Democrat side of the aisle who defended violence, looting and killings by BLM rioters only want low IQ idiots like you to see the worst parts. They don't want idiots to see the whole picture because it doesn't support their lie filled narrative.
Comparing this to 9-11? Moronic. Claiming this was a threat to democracy? Moronic. Calling it in insurrection? Lunatic. Now run along. You're dumbing down the thread again.
Combining Christianity and Islam is a majority of the religious world.
Right, monotheism.
Right. The majority of what is done, good or bad, in the world is done by minotheists. Let's be honest Hindus aren't doing much of any significance in the world. Atheists are doing much more of significance, but it seems like a gross over simplification to say that there's a connection between monotheism and violence. There's an argument that there's a connection between Islam, at least radical, fundamentalist Islam, and violence
Right. The majority of what is done, good or bad, in the world is done by minotheists. Let's be honest Hindus aren't doing much of any significance in the world. Atheists are doing much more of significance, but it seems like a gross over simplification to say that there's a connection between monotheism and violence. There's an argument that there's a connection between Islam, at least radical, fundamentalist Islam, and violence
Why do you keep saying Islam is not monotheistic?
Stalin and Mao are atheists. How many did they murder?
A lot, but it seems unlikely that they committed violence in the name of no god.
OMG!! They TRESSPASSED and caused MINOR damage!!! Meanwhile, assholes on the left, their media minions and Democrats all played down the violence, rioting damage and killings in the summer of 2020 as mostly peaceful.
STFU already. We get it, you're an idiot on steroids.
A lot, but it seems unlikely that they committed violence in the name of no god.
it was not an insurrection.
the only serious casualty was a dead trump supporter
It was a violent riot and a seditious conspiracy for the militia members who were convicted for that charge.
Your facts are wrong. There were two dead Trump supporters and 140 injured police officers.
Does the death count determine the seriousness of trying to stop the electoral vote?
“I would like to begin by addressing the heinous attack on the United States Capitol. “Like all Americans, I am outraged by the violence, lawlessness and mayhem... The demonstrators who infiltrated the Capitol have defiled the seat of American democracy. To those who engage in the acts of violence and destruction: You do not represent our country, and to those who broke the law: You will pay,”
--Donald Trump
Are you denying they both tried to stamp out religion?
Stalin and Mao were motivated by commie doctrine, which is atheist, and attempted to stamp out the "Opiate of the people". Each murdered millions in the name of atheist ideology.No, but atheists, unlike Muslims and Christians, aren't motivated by religious doctrine or a desire to win favor with a deity to ensure a happy eternity after death.
It was a violent riot and a seditious conspiracy for the militia members who were convicted for that charge.
Your facts are wrong. There were two dead Trump supporters and 140 injured police officers.
Does the death count determine the seriousness of trying to stop the electoral vote?
“I would like to begin by addressing the heinous attack on the United States Capitol. “Like all Americans, I am outraged by the violence, lawlessness and mayhem... The demonstrators who infiltrated the Capitol have defiled the seat of American democracy. To those who engage in the acts of violence and destruction: You do not represent our country, and to those who broke the law: You will pay,”
--Donald Trump
No, but atheists, unlike Muslims and Christians, aren't motivated by deity-inspired religious doctrine or a desire to win favor with a deity to ensure a happy eternity after death.
I am limiting the survey to the 20th century for an apples to apples comparison. Applying 21st century values to to 15th century tends to be anachronistic.
Worst theocracies:
Islamic Republic of Iran: extrajudicial killings, torture, repression of political opposition, secular intellectuals, and free press.
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Beheadings, political assassinations, repression of women, totalitarianism..
Taliban: beheadings, execution of homosexuals, adulterers, heretics. Intolerance for religious minorities, destruction of historic world heritage archeological sites.
State Atheism - worst atheist regimes:
Soviet Union: murder of hundreds of thousands of priests, deacons, Christian laypersons in the name of State atheism. Widespread oppression and arrests of Orthodox Christians, Muslims, Baptists.
Khmer Rouge: Murder of tens of thousands of Buddhist monks and laypersons.
Communist China: Destruction of Buddhist temples, Christian churches, widespread oppression of religious minorities.
Stalin and Mao were motivated by commie doctrine, which is atheist, and attempted to stamp out the "Opiate of the people". Each murdered millions in the name of atheist ideology.
I don't know if monotheism causes violence. But monotheism causes stupidity.