Don't be fooled Folks

[CharacterAssassin]

I thank you for your juvenile sandbox insult. You're momma must be proud, huh?

Impeachments are indictments fore high crimes & misdemeanors, i.e. "crimes" They're simply the system for criminally indicting Presidents, Judges & appointed and confirmed bureaucrats.

Irrelevant, silly whore. What Mueller was addressing were actual criminal indictments, whether or not he could issue them. Impeachment isn't the same thing.

Not that you'd actually know, being an admitted drunk.

 

[Robo]

Irrelevant, silly whore. What Mueller was addressing were actual criminal indictments, whether or not he could issue them. Impeachment isn't the same thing.

Not that you'd actually know, being an admitted drunk.

I thank you again child for your silly immature insult proving you have no civility or high enough intellect to debate without attempting to make folks think you're some tough nasty big shot. We both know you're well below tough or a big shot.

I'd suggest you take a peak at a dictionary friend and then get back to me with the difference between an article of impeachment and and any other criminal indictment aside form the impeachment is reserved for Presidents, Judges & some others in the governing body with the trial to be held in the Senate of the United States conducted by a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, while any other criminal indictment for civilians requires that a trial be held in a court of law. an article to impeach & an indictment are both criminal accusations.

 

[CharacterAssassin]

I thank you again child for your silly immature insult proving you have no civility or high enough intellect to debate without attempting to make folks think you're some tough nasty big shot. We both know you're well below tough or a big shot.

I'd suggest you take a peak at a dictionary friend and then get back to me with the difference between an article of impeachment and and any other criminal indictment aside form the impeachment is reserved for Presidents, Judges & some others in the governing body with the trial to be held in the Senate of the United States conducted by a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, while any other criminal indictment for civilians requires that a trial be held in a court of law. an article to impeach & an indictment are both criminal accusations.

LOL! And there it is. I accept your surrender and your admission that you're a lying whore.

Nice owning you.

 

[Gonzomin]

Trump is into delay tactics. He would love to see Dems take him to court. Then he could delay it with lawyers and changes of venue until his criminal ass runs out the clock. One of his first presidential plans was stacking the courts. McConnell has been complicit in the criminal enterprise. Trump did it because he knew he was going to need friendly judges to help him. He cannot allow judges in who go by the law.

 

[Teflon Don]

Trump is into delay tactics. He would love to see Dems take him to court. Then he could delay it with lawyers and changes of venue until his criminal ass runs out the clock. One of his first presidential plans was stacking the courts. McConnell has been complicit in the criminal enterprise. Trump did it because he knew he was going to need friendly judges to help him. He cannot allow judges in who go by the law.

Cry harder for me

 

[archives]

So you’re a non-believer in due process, right? You’ve convicted Barr without any testimony from Mueller.

I’ll wait for Mueller’s testimony if the Democrats ever call him to testify. What seems to be the hold up with that? Nadler seems “quick draw McGraw” when it comes to subpoenas for everybody but Mueller. Could it possibly be they don’t want to hear what the author of the Mueller Report has to say face to face, under oath, they just want to put on a theater show of contempt of Congress for the Republican bureaucrats that don’t hate Trump?

To my knowledge, Nadler hasn’t called Mueller to testify, do you know differently?

I "convicted" Barr? Of what?

Barr is a political hack, there is no doubt there, Trump didn't appoint him cause he thought Barr was the best for the job, he selected him specifically cause he knew Barr would be his lap dog, don't you recall Trump's complaint with Sessions, that he "didn't have his back?"

Mueller still technically works for the Justice Dept, meaning Trump can bar him from testifying, don't you recall the "executive privilege" defense, and as we have seen with McGhan, even if Mueller leaves the Justice Dept.

 

[archives]

Trump is into delay tactics. He would love to see Dems take him to court. Then he could delay it with lawyers and changes of venue until his criminal ass runs out the clock. One of his first presidential plans was stacking the courts. McConnell has been complicit in the criminal enterprise. Trump did it because he knew he was going to need friendly judges to help him. He cannot allow judges in who go by the law.

And there it is in a nutshell

Trump, as he has done his entire life, will litigate the hell out of anything that comes even close to tainting him. Regardless of the absurdity of his case, he will keep at it knowing eventually his boys on the SCOTUS will hear it, and as directed, decide in his favor. You'd have to be totally naive to think he appointed "I like beer" Brett to the Court cause he thought he was the best candidate

 

[Robo]

Trump is into delay tactics. He would love to see Dems take him to court. Then he could delay it with lawyers and changes of venue until his criminal ass runs out the clock. One of his first presidential plans was stacking the courts. McConnell has been complicit in the criminal enterprise. Trump did it because he knew he was going to need friendly judges to help him. He cannot allow judges in who go by the law.

And Obama appointed only non-partisan judges, right? Could you please submit Trumps crimes? I’ll understand if you can’t!!!!!

 

[Truth Detector]

More honesty, reality and facts show us that Democrats don’t want to impeach this President Donald J. Trump, their theater show in the Congress & perpetuated on CNN & MSNBC has a single agenda, TRASH TRUMP & BARR BEFORE THE 2020 ELECTION. Democrats have no solutions for the real issues facing America, so they’re campaigning on Trump & Barr Hate. Democrats are the party of hate & the unwitting dupes & agents of Vladimir Putin who’s agenda is to divide & conquer America.

Spot on!

 

[Truth Detector]

You are deep in your TDS. Mueller stated in his report that he didn't consider indicting Trump because of DOJ policy. There's plenty of credible evidence for impeachment, a lot more than there is for indicting Hillary.

This is a pile of bullshit, par for the course with idiots like you.

Provide me the page and specific language you attribute to Mueller. Mueller is not prevented from recommending indictment for criminal actions. He didn't recommend it due to the FACT there was little in the way of evidence to support the nonsensical claims that a President would obstruct an investigation where wrong doing never occurred.

It's obvious that Trumps election has exposed the liberal left as the mentallly retarded Fascists we have always known them to be. Another good reason to re-elect Trump.

 

[Truth Detector]

Barr is a Trump stooge.

Eric Holder declared he was Obamas wingman. I don't remember seeing any liberal outrage back then. Why?

Eric Holder: “I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done,” I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy.”

 

[Robo]

I "convicted" Barr? Of what?

Being a Trump stooge puppet covering up something, (only god knows what), for Trump. Me thinks you need evidence first. What’s your evidence? I’ll understand if you can’t come up with any!!!!!

Barr is a political hack, there is no doubt there, Trump didn't appoint him cause he thought Barr was the best for the job, he selected him specifically cause he knew Barr would be his lap dog, don't you recall Trump's complaint with Sessions, that he "didn't have his back?"

Again, present your evidence! I’ll understand again if you have none!!!!!

Were you so outraged when Obama’s AG Erik Holder said “I’m Barrack’s wing man, I’m his boy?”

Mueller still technically works for the Justice Dept, meaning Trump can bar him from testifying, don't you recall the "executive privilege" defense, and as we have seen with McGhan, even if Mueller leaves the Justice Dept.

I don’t recall Trump claiming executive privilege concerning Mueller testifying. Either neither House of the Congress hasn’t called Mueller, or Mueller doesn’t want to testify voluntarily, huh?

 

[Truth Detector]

Now there is your first mistake, believing anything Barr said, if we have learned anything over the last two months it is that Barr is a political hack appointed specifically to defend Trump

And it all could be resolved if Mueller testifies, but you know Barr and Trump regardless of what they say will go to any ends to make sure that doesn't happen

This is BULL SHIT; you love to wallow in it.

Eric Holder: “I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done,” I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy.”

 

[Truth Detector]

Trump is into delay tactics. He would love to see Dems take him to court. Then he could delay it with lawyers and changes of venue until his criminal ass runs out the clock. One of his first presidential plans was stacking the courts. McConnell has been complicit in the criminal enterprise. Trump did it because he knew he was going to need friendly judges to help him. He cannot allow judges in who go by the law.

Eric Holder: “I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done,” I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy.”

 

[Gonzomin]

Sitting presidents have been indicted a few times. It's called "impeachment" in the case of sitting Presidents. it's in the "CONSTITUTION." Everything concerning government actions is determined legally by the Constitution.

Mueller was not involved in impeachment. He was involved in Russias corrupting our election processes to help Trump. It was not in his mandate. However, he made it clear that Trump was involved in many obstructions. The Dems are following up. Trump is a criminal and I hope he does not escape like Nixon.

 

[rjhenn]

I thank you again child for your silly immature insult proving you have no civility or high enough intellect to debate without attempting to make folks think you're some tough nasty big shot. We both know you're well below tough or a big shot.

I'd suggest you take a peak at a dictionary friend and then get back to me with the difference between an article of impeachment and and any other criminal indictment aside form the impeachment is reserved for Presidents, Judges & some others in the governing body with the trial to be held in the Senate of the United States conducted by a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, while any other criminal indictment for civilians requires that a trial be held in a court of law. an article to impeach & an indictment are both criminal accusations.

The usual barely coherent post by Robo.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

Trump is into delay tactics. He would love to see Dems take him to court. Then he could delay it with lawyers and changes of venue until his criminal ass runs out the clock. One of his first presidential plans was stacking the courts. McConnell has been complicit in the criminal enterprise. Trump did it because he knew he was going to need friendly judges to help him. He cannot allow judges in who go by the law.

Trump has been busy stocking the swamp with his own swamp creatures.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[domer76]

Don’t be fooled folks, House Democrats are whining and bitching that a President can’t be indicted for a crime, otherwise Trump would have been indicted by Mueller. All of that horseshit is nothing but theater for their rabid mad junkyard dog democrat base voters.

Now for some real facts, the legal argument of whether a sitting President can be indicted for a crime has never yet been decided in the courts. So, if the Trump hater Mueller thought for a single second there was enough evidence that Trump had committed obstruction, he’d have indicted him and thrown the entire issue into the courts.

The stupid argument that a sitting President can or cannot be indicted for a crime is absurd & irrelevant to begin with. The Constitution provides the impeachment process which is by definition an indictment of a sitting President. Dictionary.com says an impeachment is a “ formal accusation/charge.” Dictionary.com also says that an indictment is a formal accusation/charge. So if the screaming rabid mad junkyard dog democrats truly want to indict this President, all they have to do is pass articles of impeachment through the House Of Representatives where they hold a majority.

More honesty, reality and facts show us that Democrats don’t want to impeach this President Donald J. Trump, their theater show in the Congress & perpetuated on CNN & MSNBC has a single agenda, TRASH TRUMP & BARR BEFORE THE 2020 ELECTION. Democrats have no solutions for the real issues facing America, so they’re campaigning on Trump & Barr Hate. Democrats are the party of hate & the unwitting dupes & agents of Vladimir Putin who’s agenda is to divide & conquer America.

900 former federal prosecutors said he would be prosecuted for obstruction if he was not President.

 

[rjhenn]

Don’t be fooled folks, House Democrats are whining and bitching that a President can’t be indicted for a crime, otherwise Trump would have been indicted by Mueller. All of that horseshit is nothing but theater for their rabid mad junkyard dog democrat base voters.

Now for some real facts, the legal argument of whether a sitting President can be indicted for a crime has never yet been decided in the courts. So, if the Trump hater Mueller thought for a single second there was enough evidence that Trump had committed obstruction, he’d have indicted him and thrown the entire issue into the courts.

The stupid argument that a sitting President can or cannot be indicted for a crime is absurd & irrelevant to begin with. The Constitution provides the impeachment process which is by definition an indictment of a sitting President. Dictionary.com says an impeachment is a “ formal accusation/charge.” Dictionary.com also says that an indictment is a formal accusation/charge. So if the screaming rabid mad junkyard dog democrats truly want to indict this President, all they have to do is pass articles of impeachment through the House Of Representatives where they hold a majority.

More honesty, reality and facts show us that Democrats don’t want to impeach this President Donald J. Trump, their theater show in the Congress & perpetuated on CNN & MSNBC has a single agenda, TRASH TRUMP & BARR BEFORE THE 2020 ELECTION. Democrats have no solutions for the real issues facing America, so they’re campaigning on Trump & Barr Hate. Democrats are the party of hate & the unwitting dupes & agents of Vladimir Putin who’s agenda is to divide & conquer America.

As usual, not a clue. Impeachment is not the same as a criminal indictment. Impeachment is the constitutional mechanism for removing a criminal President. It is DOJ policy that a sitting President cannot be indicted. Impeachment is the only route available. And impeachment is a no go from the start because impeachment is tried in the Senate, which is controlled by Trump cultists. It's clearly Trump and the Republicans who have no solutions for the real problems facing America. If they did, why didn't they do something about them during the 2 years that they had control of the government?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

Actually, if you were paying attention, Barr has testified before the Senate Judiciary committee that he Barr ask Mueller if his ignoring a decision on obstruction in his report was based in a position that a sitting President cannot be indicted, and Mueller said “NO.” House Democrats are making the argument that a sitting president cannot be indicted and that’s why Muller didn’t indict him and thereby he Mueller left any obstruction decision up to the Congress and not Barr.



Of course! The Democrat’s other reasons for not impeaching is Nancy Pelosi is begging them not to issue articles of impeachment because she remembers how Bill Clinton’s favorable numbers went up when he was impeached, and Nancy and the rest of the Democrats know there’s no credible evidence for impeaching Trump. That’s why The Democrats are conducting an impeachment in drag in the House Judiciary committee aimed at simply trashing Trump and Barr for the base and the 2020 election.



Trump has done more to oppose Putin & Russia than any President since Reagan.

It’s the Democrats, and their flunky media propaganda machine CNN & MSNBC that’s Putin’s puppet dividing Americans with trump Hate!!!!!!

Barr is a liar. Mueller said in his report that the reason that he didn't pursue indictments against Trump was because of DOJ policy. And you avoid real news in favor of the fake news that you get from the right-wing propaganda outlets.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk